Suppr超能文献

三维与二维超声生物测量预测糖尿病妊娠的出生体重及巨大儿

Three-Versus Two-Dimensional Sonographic Biometry for Predicting Birth Weight and Macrosomia in Diabetic Pregnancies.

作者信息

Tuuli Methodius G, Kapalka Kristen, Macones George A, Cahill Alison G

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri USA

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University, St Louis, Missouri USA.

出版信息

J Ultrasound Med. 2016 Sep;35(9):1925-30. doi: 10.7863/ultra.15.08032. Epub 2016 Jul 27.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that a formula incorporating 3-dimensional (3D) fractional thigh volume would be superior to the conventional 2-dimensional (2D) formula of Hadlock et al (Am J Obstet Gynecol 1985; 151:333-337) for predicting birth weight and macrosomia.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective cohort study of pregnancies complicated by pregestational or gestational diabetes and delivered after 38 weeks. Two-dimensional and 3D sonographic examinations were performed for fetal biometry and factional thigh volumes at 34 to 37 weeks. Fetal weight was estimated by Hadlock's 2D formula IV, which uses only 2D biometry, and formula 6 from Lee et al (Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 2009; 34:556-565), which incorporates 3D fractional thigh volume and 2D biometry. The gestation-adjusted projection method was used to estimate predicted birth weights from 2D and 3D estimates. The primary outcome was fetal macrosomia, which was defined as birth weight of 4000 g or higher.

RESULTS

A total of 115 women with diabetes met inclusion criteria, and 17 (14.8%) delivered macrosomic neonates. The mean percentage error was significantly lower for the 2D than the 3D projected estimate (1.0% versus 12.0%; P < .01). The standard deviation of the mean percentage error was also significantly lower for the 2D projected estimate (10.2% versus 17.2%; P< .01). Two-dimensional biometry was overall superior to 3D biometry for predicting macrosomia (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, 0.88 versus 0.75; P = .03). Specificity was significantly higher for 2D biometry (85% versus 66%; P < .01), whereas the difference in sensitivity was not statistically significant (59% versus 71%; P = .22).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, the Hadlock 2D formula was superior to the 3D method for predicting birth weight and macrosomia in diabetic women when used approximately 2 weeks before delivery, based on the gestation-adjusted projection method.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在验证一个假设,即包含三维(3D)大腿部体积分数的公式在预测出生体重及巨大儿时,优于Hadlock等人(《美国妇产科杂志》1985年;151:333 - 337)的传统二维(2D)公式。

方法

我们对患有孕前或孕期糖尿病且孕38周后分娩的孕妇进行了一项前瞻性队列研究。在孕34至37周时进行二维和三维超声检查,测量胎儿生物指标及大腿部体积分数。胎儿体重通过仅使用二维生物指标的Hadlock二维公式IV以及Lee等人(《超声妇产科杂志》2009年;34:556 - 565)的公式6进行估算,公式6纳入了三维大腿部体积分数和二维生物指标。采用妊娠调整投影法根据二维和三维估算值来估计预测出生体重。主要结局为胎儿巨大儿,定义为出生体重4000g及以上。

结果

共有115例糖尿病女性符合纳入标准,其中17例(14.8%)分娩出巨大儿新生儿。二维预测估计值的平均百分比误差显著低于三维预测估计值(1.0%对12.0%;P < 0.01)。二维预测估计值的平均百分比误差标准差也显著更低(10.2%对17.2%;P < 0.01)。二维生物测量在预测巨大儿方面总体优于三维生物测量(受试者操作特征曲线下面积,0.88对0.75;P = 0.03)。二维生物测量的特异性显著更高(85%对66%;P < 0.01),而敏感性差异无统计学意义(59%对71%;P = 0.22)。

结论

在本研究中,基于妊娠调整投影法,在分娩前约2周使用时,Hadlock二维公式在预测糖尿病女性的出生体重和巨大儿方面优于三维方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验