Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Clinical Sciences, Lund University, Lund, Sweden.
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Mar;33(3):295-300. doi: 10.1002/uog.6281.
To compare two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) ultrasound techniques, including volumetry of fetal thigh, for fetal weight (FW) estimation in prolonged pregnancy, and to develop a new FW estimation formula.
This prospective comparative study initially included 176 pregnant women. FW estimation was performed at >or= 287 days of gestation within <or= 4 days of delivery. Fetal head, abdomen and femur were measured using 2D ultrasound techniques, and fetal thigh volume was estimated using 3D techniques. The formula of Persson and Weldner (2D) was compared with two 3D formulae published by Lee and colleagues. In a subgroup of 63 fetuses, volumetry of the abdomen was performed and a new formula was developed; this formula was tested prospectively, along with the previously published formulae, on a further 50 women (Test Group).
In the initial group of 176 pregnancies, the SD of the mean percentage error (MPE) was 6.3% for both the 2D Persson and Weldner formula and for the better performing 3D formula of Lee et al., but the MPE of this Lee formula differed significantly from zero. Significantly more FW estimations were within +/- 10% of the birth weight when the 2D formula was used than when the 3D formulae were applied. The new formula gave a SD of MPE of 5.6% when applied to the data from which it was derived. In the Test Group, the SD of MPE was similar for the 2D formula, the second formula of Lee et al. and the new formula, with values of 7.0, 7.0 and 7.1, respectively, but only the Persson and Weldner formula showed a MPE that did not differ significantly from zero.
FW in prolonged pregnancies can be estimated using 2D sonography with the same accuracy as with 3D sonography. 3D ultrasound techniques require technically advanced and expensive equipment, special operator training and skills, and are time consuming. It does not seem reasonable to abandon the 2D ultrasound methods in favor of 3D ultrasound imaging for FW estimation.
比较二维(2D)和三维(3D)超声技术,包括胎儿大腿体积测量,以评估延长妊娠的胎儿体重(FW),并开发新的 FW 估计公式。
本前瞻性对照研究最初纳入了 176 名孕妇。在分娩前 <or= 4 天内,在 >or= 287 天的妊娠时进行 FW 估计。使用 2D 超声技术测量胎儿头部、腹部和股骨,使用 3D 技术估计胎儿大腿体积。比较了 Persson 和 Weldner(2D)公式与 Lee 等人发表的两个 3D 公式。在 63 例胎儿的亚组中,进行了腹部体积测量并开发了新公式;该公式在另外 50 名女性(测试组)中进行了前瞻性测试,同时测试了以前发表的公式。
在最初的 176 例妊娠中,2D Persson 和 Weldner 公式和表现较好的 Lee 等 3D 公式的平均百分比误差(MPE)的标准差均为 6.3%,但 Lee 公式的 MPE 与零有显著差异。当使用 2D 公式时,FW 估计值在 +/- 10%的出生体重范围内的比例显著高于使用 3D 公式时的比例。当将新公式应用于其原始数据时,MPE 的标准差为 5.6%。在测试组中,2D 公式、Lee 等的第二个公式和新公式的 MPE 的标准差相似,分别为 7.0、7.0 和 7.1,但只有 Persson 和 Weldner 公式的 MPE 与零无显著差异。
在延长妊娠中,可以使用 2D 超声以与 3D 超声相同的准确性来估计 FW。3D 超声技术需要技术先进且昂贵的设备、特殊的操作员培训和技能,并且耗时。似乎没有理由为了 FW 估计而放弃 2D 超声方法而采用 3D 超声成像。