• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

俄克拉荷马州验光师与眼科医生进行激光小梁成形术的效果比较。

Comparison of Outcomes of Laser Trabeculoplasty Performed by Optometrists vs Ophthalmologists in Oklahoma.

作者信息

Stein Joshua D, Zhao Peter Y, Andrews Chris, Skuta Gregory L

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Michigan, Medical School, WK Kellogg Eye Center, Ann Arbor2Institute for Healthcare Policy and Innovation, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor3Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan, School of Public Health, Ann Arbor.

Department of Internal Medicine, Lankenau Medical Center, Wynnewood, Pennsylvania.

出版信息

JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016 Oct 1;134(10):1095-1101. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2016.2495.

DOI:10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2016.2495
PMID:27467233
Abstract

IMPORTANCE

Oklahoma is one of the few states where optometrists have surgical privileges to perform laser trabeculoplasty (LTP). Optometrists in other states are lobbying to obtain privileges to perform LTP and other laser procedures. Little is known whether outcomes of patients undergoing this procedure by optometrists are similar to those undergoing LTP by ophthalmologists.

OBJECTIVE

To compare outcomes of LTPs performed by ophthalmologists with those performed by optometrists to determine whether differences exist in the need for additional LTPs.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective longitudinal cohort study used a health care claims database containing more than 1000 eyes of Medicare enrollees with glaucoma who underwent LTP in Oklahoma from January 1, 2008, through December 31, 2013. For each procedure, the data specify the type of eye care professional who performed the LTP. The rate of LTPs performed by ophthalmologists that required 1 or more additional LTPs in the same eye was compared with the rate of LTPs performed by optometrists. Regression models determined factors affecting risk of undergoing more than 1 LTP in the same eye.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

Proportion of enrollees requiring additional LTPs, hazard ratio with 95% CIs of undergoing additional LTPs.

RESULTS

A total of 1384 eyes of 891 eligible patients underwent LTP from January 1, 2008, through December 31, 2013. There were 1150 eyes that received LTP (83.1%) by an ophthalmologist and 234 eyes (16.9%) that had the procedure performed by an optometrist. The mean (SD) age at the initial LTP was 77.7 (7.5) years for enrollees with ophthalmologist-performed LTP and 77.6 (8.0) years for those with optometrist-performed LTP (P = .89). Among the 1384 eyes receiving LTP, 258 (18.6%) underwent more than 1 LTP in the same eye. The proportion of eyes undergoing LTP by an optometrist requiring 1 or more subsequent LTP session (35.9%) was more than double the proportion of eyes that received this procedure by an ophthalmologist (15.1%). Medicare beneficiaries undergoing LTP by optometrists had a 189% increased hazard of requiring additional LTPs in the same eye compared with those receiving LTP by ophthalmologists (hazard ratio, 2.89; 95% CI, 2.00-4.17; P < .001) after adjusting for potential confounders.

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Considerable differences exist among the proportions of patients requiring additional LTPs comparing those who were initially treated by ophthalmologists with those initially treated by optometrists. Health policy makers should be cautious about approving laser privileges for optometrists practicing in other states until the reasons for these differences are better understood.

摘要

重要性

俄克拉荷马州是少数几个验光师拥有进行激光小梁成形术(LTP)手术特权的州之一。其他州的验光师正在游说争取进行LTP和其他激光手术的特权。对于由验光师实施该手术的患者与由眼科医生实施LTP的患者的治疗效果是否相似,人们知之甚少。

目的

比较眼科医生与验光师进行LTP的治疗效果,以确定在是否需要再次进行LTP方面是否存在差异。

设计、地点和参与者:这项回顾性纵向队列研究使用了一个医疗保健理赔数据库,该数据库包含2008年1月1日至2013年12月31日期间在俄克拉荷马州接受LTP的1000多只患有青光眼的医疗保险参保者的眼睛。对于每一例手术,数据都明确了实施LTP的眼科护理专业人员的类型。将同一只眼睛需要1次或更多次额外LTP的眼科医生实施LTP的比例与验光师实施LTP的比例进行比较。回归模型确定了影响同一只眼睛接受1次以上LTP风险的因素。

主要结局和指标

需要再次进行LTP的参保者比例,再次进行LTP的风险比及95%置信区间。

结果

从2008年1月1日至2013年12月31日,共有891名符合条件的患者的1384只眼睛接受了LTP。其中1150只眼睛(83.1%)由眼科医生进行了LTP,234只眼睛(16.9%)由验光师进行了该手术。接受眼科医生实施LTP的参保者初次接受LTP时的平均(标准差)年龄为77.7(7.5)岁,接受验光师实施LTP的参保者为77.6(8.0)岁(P = 0.89)。在接受LTP的1384只眼睛中,258只(18.6%)在同一只眼睛接受了1次以上的LTP。由验光师进行LTP且需要1次或更多次后续LTP治疗的眼睛比例(35.9%)是由眼科医生进行该手术的眼睛比例(15.1%)的两倍多。在调整了潜在混杂因素后,与接受眼科医生LTP的医疗保险受益人相比,接受验光师LTP的受益人同一只眼睛需要再次进行LTP的风险增加了189%(风险比,2.89;95%置信区间,2.00 - 4.17;P < 0.001)。

结论与意义

在需要再次进行LTP的患者比例方面,最初由眼科医生治疗的患者与最初由验光师治疗的患者之间存在显著差异。在更好地理解这些差异的原因之前,卫生政策制定者在批准其他州验光师的激光手术特权时应谨慎行事。

相似文献

1
Comparison of Outcomes of Laser Trabeculoplasty Performed by Optometrists vs Ophthalmologists in Oklahoma.俄克拉荷马州验光师与眼科医生进行激光小梁成形术的效果比较。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016 Oct 1;134(10):1095-1101. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2016.2495.
2
Evaluating Access to Laser Eye Surgery by Driving Times Using Medicare Data and Geographical Mapping.利用医疗保险数据和地理绘图评估激光眼科手术的可达性与行车时间的关系。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2023 Aug 1;141(8):776-783. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2023.3061.
3
Comparative outcomes of selective laser trabeculoplasty delivered by optometrists compared with ophthalmologists: a UK-based multicentre observational study.验光师与眼科医生进行选择性激光小梁成形术的比较结果:一项基于英国的多中心观察性研究。
BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 2024 Oct 2;9(1):e001870. doi: 10.1136/bmjophth-2024-001870.
4
Comparing Access to Laser Capsulotomy Performed by Optometrists and Ophthalmologists in Oklahoma by Calculated Driving Distance and Time.比较俄克拉荷马州视光师和眼科医生通过计算驾驶距离和时间进行激光囊切开术的机会。
Ophthalmology. 2017 Sep;124(9):1290-1295. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.03.062. Epub 2017 May 9.
5
Access to Ophthalmologists in States Where Optometrists Have Expanded Scope of Practice.在视光师扩大执业范围的州,获得眼科医生的途径。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2018 Jan 1;136(1):39-45. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2017.5081.
6
Ophthalmologist and Optometrist Glaucoma Prescribing Patterns Based on 2015 Medicare Part D Data.基于2015年医疗保险D部分数据的眼科医生和验光师青光眼处方模式
Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2019 Jan-Feb;2(1):63-66. doi: 10.1016/j.ogla.2018.11.009. Epub 2018 Nov 30.
7
Effectiveness of Angle-Based Minimally Invasive Glaucoma Surgery after Laser Trabeculoplasty: An Analysis of the IRIS® Registry (Intelligent Research in Sight).基于角度的微创青光眼手术后激光小梁成形术的效果:IRIS®注册分析(智能研究在视线中)。
Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2024 Jul-Aug;7(4):335-344. doi: 10.1016/j.ogla.2024.03.003. Epub 2024 Mar 20.
8
Trends over time and regional variations in the rate of laser trabeculoplasty in the Medicare population.医疗保险人群中激光小梁成形术发生率随时间的变化趋势及地区差异。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2014 Jun;132(6):685-90. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2014.369.
9
Laser Trabeculoplasty Use Patterns Among Optometrists and Ophthalmologists in Oklahoma.
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2016 Oct 1;134(10):1101-1102. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2016.2567.
10
Burden of Trabeculectomy and Glaucoma Drainage Implantation after Laser Trabeculoplasty: A Two-Year Follow-up Study.激光小梁成形术后小梁切除术和青光眼引流植入术的负担:一项为期两年的随访研究。
Ophthalmol Glaucoma. 2022 Jan-Feb;5(1):58-66. doi: 10.1016/j.ogla.2021.07.004. Epub 2021 Jul 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Rates of Laser Trabeculoplasty by Ophthalmologists and Optometrists: A Comparative Analysis of the CMS Medicare Public Use File.眼科医生和验光师进行激光小梁成形术的比率:对医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)医疗保险公共使用文件的比较分析
Clin Ophthalmol. 2024 Jan 30;18:269-275. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S438052. eCollection 2024.
2
Association of Private Equity Firm Acquisition of Ophthalmology Practices with Medicare Spending and Use of Ophthalmology Services.私募股权公司收购眼科诊所与医疗保险支出和眼科服务使用的关联。
Ophthalmology. 2024 Mar;131(3):360-369. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2023.09.029. Epub 2023 Sep 29.
3
Selective laser trabeculoplasty (SLT) performed by optometrists for patients with glaucoma and ocular hypertension: a scoping review.
验光师为青光眼和高眼压症患者实施选择性激光小梁成形术:一项范围综述
BMJ Open Ophthalmol. 2021 Mar 11;6(1):e000611. doi: 10.1136/bmjophth-2020-000611. eCollection 2021.
4
Factors Associated With Favorable Laser Trabeculoplasty Response: IRIS Registry Analysis.与激光小梁成形术治疗反应良好相关的因素:IRIS 注册研究分析。
Am J Ophthalmol. 2021 Mar;223:149-158. doi: 10.1016/j.ajo.2020.10.004. Epub 2020 Oct 10.
5
Differences in characteristics of Medicare patients treated by ophthalmologists and optometrists.眼科医生和验光师治疗的 Medicare 患者特征的差异。
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 14;15(9):e0227783. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227783. eCollection 2020.
6
Public Awareness regarding the Differences between Ophthalmologists and Optometrists among Saudi Adults Living in Riyadh: A Quantitative Study.利雅得沙特成年人对眼科医生和验光师差异的公众认知:一项定量研究。
J Ophthalmol. 2018 Sep 30;2018:7418269. doi: 10.1155/2018/7418269. eCollection 2018.
7
Differences in Tertiary Glaucoma Care in the Veterans Affairs Health Care System.退伍军人事务部医疗保健系统中三级青光眼护理的差异。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2018 Nov 1;136(11):1227-1234. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2018.3463.
8
Access to Ophthalmologists in States Where Optometrists Have Expanded Scope of Practice.在视光师扩大执业范围的州,获得眼科医生的途径。
JAMA Ophthalmol. 2018 Jan 1;136(1):39-45. doi: 10.1001/jamaophthalmol.2017.5081.