Hu H, Cook-Deegan R, Shukri A
Channing Laboratory, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass.
JAMA. 1989 Aug 4;262(5):640-3.
The use of chemical weapons in conflict represents a breach of international law as well as a grave violation of human rights. Investigating allegations of their use often is difficult. A basic tool is the survey interview. Experience has shown that a rigorous epidemiologic approach should be taken. A primary emphasis should be designing the study so that consistency of responses can be analyzed to judge the validity of the testimony. Only when the testimony can withstand this scrutiny is it possible to surmise the possible identity of agents employed. Securing samples of the putative agent is of obvious importance. Two recent investigations are discussed herein, one conducted by US Army medical researchers on allegations of chemical weapons use against the Hmong in Laos and another mounted by us on allegations of poison-gas attack against the Iraqi Kurds.
在冲突中使用化学武器既违反国际法,也是对人权的严重侵犯。调查有关化学武器使用的指控往往困难重重。一种基本手段是进行调查访谈。经验表明,应采取严谨的流行病学方法。首要重点应是设计研究,以便能够分析回答的一致性,从而判断证词的有效性。只有当证词能够经受住这种审查时,才有可能推测出所使用制剂的可能种类。获取疑似制剂的样本显然至关重要。本文讨论了最近的两项调查,一项是美国陆军医学研究人员针对老挝苗族遭化学武器袭击指控展开的调查,另一项是我们针对伊拉克库尔德人遭毒气袭击指控进行的调查。