Suppr超能文献

盐与小剂量呋塞米和卡培立肽治疗急性失代偿性心力衰竭的比较:一项单中心回顾性队列研究。

Comparison of salt with low-dose furosemide and carperitide for treating acute decompensated heart failure: a single-center retrospective cohort study.

作者信息

Okuhara Yoshitaka, Hirotani Shinichi, Ando Tomotaka, Nishimura Koichi, Orihara Yoshiyuki, Komamura Kazuo, Naito Yoshiro, Mano Toshiaki, Masuyama Tohru

机构信息

Cardiovascular Division, Department of Internal Medicine, Hyogo College of Medicine, 1-1 Mukogawa-cho, Nishinomiya, Hyogo, 663-8501, Japan.

出版信息

Heart Vessels. 2017 Apr;32(4):419-427. doi: 10.1007/s00380-016-0883-1. Epub 2016 Jul 28.

Abstract

Hypertonic saline with furosemide has been proposed for a long time as an effective therapeutic option for the treatment of acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF). We previously reported the efficacy of continuous infusion of 1.7 % hypertonic saline plus low-dose furosemide in treatment for ADHF. Although this therapeutic strategy can be a useful option for effective decongestion in treatment for ADHF, there is no study that assesses the effect and safety of saline supplementation compared with standard therapy in Japan. The aim of this study was to investigate the efficacy, safety, and cost-effectiveness of 1.7 % hypertonic saline plus low-dose furosemide infusion compared with carperitide. We compared clinical outcomes, adverse events, and cost for patients receiving carperitide (carperitide group) with those for patients receiving 1.7 % hypertonic saline plus low-dose furosemide (salt group) during the initial hospitalization for ADHF. The cost analysis was performed on the basis of the previous report about cost-effectiveness of acute heart failure. A total of 175 ADHF patients received either carperitide (n = 111) or 1.7 % hypertonic saline plus low-dose furosemide infusion (n = 64) as initial treatment. There were no differences in length of hospital stay (27 ± 19 vs. 25 ± 16 day, p = 0.170) and infusion period (7.2 ± 6.1 vs. 8.4 ± 7.5 day, p = 0.474) between the two groups. The incidence of rehospitalization did not differ at 1 month (7.6 vs. 6.6 %, p = 1.000) and 1 year (36.8 vs. 37.7 %, p = 0.907) between the two groups. The Kaplan-Meier curves revealed no significant difference for 1 year all-cause mortality between the two groups (log-rank, p = 0.724). The single hospitalization cost was 95,314 yen lower and the yearly hospitalization cost 125,628 yen lower in the salt group compared with the carperitide group. Thus, intravenous 1.7 % hypertonic saline plus low-dose furosemide infusion is as effective as carperitide in terms of clinical outcome and is a cost-effective therapeutic strategy for the treatment of ADHF.

摘要

高渗盐水联合呋塞米长期以来一直被认为是治疗急性失代偿性心力衰竭(ADHF)的有效治疗选择。我们之前报道了持续输注1.7%高渗盐水加小剂量呋塞米治疗ADHF的疗效。尽管这种治疗策略可能是ADHF有效消肿治疗的一个有用选择,但在日本尚无研究评估与标准治疗相比补充盐水的效果和安全性。本研究的目的是调查1.7%高渗盐水加小剂量呋塞米输注与卡培立肽相比的疗效、安全性和成本效益。我们比较了ADHF初次住院期间接受卡培立肽治疗的患者(卡培立肽组)和接受1.7%高渗盐水加小剂量呋塞米治疗的患者(盐水组)的临床结局、不良事件和成本。成本分析是基于之前关于急性心力衰竭成本效益的报告进行的。共有175例ADHF患者接受了卡培立肽(n = 111)或1.7%高渗盐水加小剂量呋塞米输注(n = 64)作为初始治疗。两组之间的住院时间(27±19天对25±16天,p = 0.170)和输注时间(7.2±6.1天对8.4±7.5天,p = 0.474)没有差异。两组在1个月(7.6%对6.6%,p = 1.000)和1年(36.8%对37.7%,p = 0.907)时的再住院发生率没有差异。Kaplan-Meier曲线显示两组之间1年全因死亡率没有显著差异(对数秩检验,p = 0.724)。与卡培立肽组相比,盐水组的单次住院成本低95,314日元,年度住院成本低125,628日元。因此,静脉输注1.7%高渗盐水加小剂量呋塞米在临床结局方面与卡培立肽一样有效,是治疗ADHF的一种具有成本效益的治疗策略。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验