Singer Sara J, Molina George, Li Zhonghe, Jiang Wei, Nurudeen Suliat, Kite Julia G, Edmondson Lizabeth, Foster Richard, Haynes Alex B, Berry William R
Harvard TH Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA; Harvard Medical School, Mongan Institute for Health Policy, Boston, MA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.
Ariadne Labs, Boston, MA; Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.
J Am Coll Surg. 2016 Oct;223(4):568-580.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.07.006. Epub 2016 Jul 26.
Studies show that using surgical safety checklists (SSCs) reduces complications. Many believe SSCs accomplish this by enhancing teamwork, but evidence is limited. Our study sought to relate teamwork to checklist performance, understand how they relate, and determine conditions that affect this relationship.
Using 2 validated tools for observing and coaching operating room teams, we evaluated the association between checklist performance with surgeon buy-in and 4 domains of surgical teamwork: clinical leadership, communication, coordination, and respect. Hospital staff in 10 South Carolina hospitals observed 207 procedures between April 2011 and January 2013. We calculated levels of checklist performance, buy-in, and measures of teamwork, and evaluated their relationship, controlling for patient and case characteristics.
Few teams completed most or all SSC items. Teams more often completed items considered procedural "checks" than conversation "prompts." Surgeon buy-in, clinical leadership, communication, a summary measure of teamwork overall, and observers' teamwork ratings positively related to overall checklist completion (multivariable model estimates from 0.04, p < 0.05 for communication to 0.17, p < 0.01 for surgeon buy-in). All measures of teamwork and surgeon buy-in related positively to completing more conversation prompts; none related significantly to procedural checks (estimates from 0.10, p < 0.01 for communication to 0.27, p < 0.001 for surgeon buy-in). Patient age was significantly associated with completing the checklist and prompts (p < 0.05); only case duration was positively associated with performing more checks (p < 0.10).
Surgeon buy-in and surgical teamwork characterized by shared clinical leadership, open communication, active coordination, and mutual respect were critical in prompting case-related conversations, but not in completing procedural checks. Findings highlight the importance of surgeon engagement and high-quality, consistent teamwork for promoting checklist use and ensuring a safe surgical environment.
研究表明,使用手术安全核对表(SSC)可减少并发症。许多人认为SSC通过加强团队协作来实现这一目标,但相关证据有限。我们的研究旨在将团队协作与核对表执行情况相关联,了解它们之间的关系,并确定影响这种关系的条件。
我们使用2种经过验证的工具来观察和指导手术室团队,评估核对表执行情况与外科医生支持度以及手术团队协作的4个领域(临床领导力、沟通、协调和尊重)之间的关联。2011年4月至2013年1月期间,南卡罗来纳州10家医院的工作人员观察了207台手术。我们计算了核对表执行水平、支持度以及团队协作指标,并评估了它们之间的关系,同时控制了患者和病例特征。
很少有团队完成了大部分或所有的SSC项目。团队完成被视为程序性“检查”的项目比对话“提示”项目更为频繁。外科医生的支持度、临床领导力、沟通、整体团队协作的综合指标以及观察者的团队协作评分与核对表的总体完成情况呈正相关(多变量模型估计值从沟通方面的0.04,p<0.05到外科医生支持度方面的0.17,p<0.01)。所有团队协作指标和外科医生支持度与完成更多对话提示呈正相关;与程序性检查均无显著关联(估计值从沟通方面的0.10,p<0.01到外科医生支持度方面的0.27,p<0.001)。患者年龄与核对表及提示的完成情况显著相关(p<0.05);只有病例持续时间与进行更多检查呈正相关(p<0.10)。
外科医生的支持度以及以共享临床领导力、开放沟通、积极协调和相互尊重为特征的手术团队协作对于推动与病例相关的对话至关重要,但对于完成程序性检查并非如此。研究结果凸显了外科医生的参与以及高质量、一致的团队协作对于促进核对表的使用和确保安全手术环境的重要性。