Denault André Y, Bussières Jean S, Arellano Ramiro, Finegan Barry, Gavra Paul, Haddad François, Nguyen Anne Q N, Varin France, Fortier Annik, Levesque Sylvie, Shi Yanfen, Elmi-Sarabi Mahsa, Tardif Jean-Claude, Perrault Louis P, Lambert Jean
Department of Anesthesia, Montreal Heart Institute, Université de Montréal, 5000 Bélanger Street, Montreal, QC, H1T 1C8, Canada.
Department of Anesthesiology, Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Québec, Quebec, QC, Canada.
Can J Anaesth. 2016 Oct;63(10):1140-1153. doi: 10.1007/s12630-016-0709-8. Epub 2016 Jul 28.
Inhaled milrinone (iMil) has been used for the treatment of pulmonary hypertension (PH) but its efficacy, safety, and prophylactic effects in facilitating separation from cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and preventing right ventricular (RV) dysfunction have not yet been evaluated in a clinical trial. The purpose of this study was to investigate if iMil administered before CPB would be superior to placebo in facilitating separation from CPB.
High-risk cardiac surgical patients with PH were randomized to receive iMil or placebo after the induction of anesthesia and before CPB. Hemodynamic parameters and RV function were evaluated by means of pulmonary artery catheterization and transesophageal echocardiography. The groups were compared for the primary outcome of the level of difficulty in weaning from CPB. Among the secondary outcomes examined were the reduction in the severity of PH, the incidence of RV failure, and mortality.
Of the 124 patients randomized, the mean (standard deviation [SD]) EuroSCORE II was 8.0 (2.6), and the baseline mean (SD) systolic pulmonary artery pressure (SPAP) was 53 (9) mmHg. The use of iMil was associated with increases in cardiac output (P = 0.03) and a reduction in SPAP (P = 0.04) with no systemic hypotension. Nevertheless, there was no difference in the combined incidence of difficult or complex separation from CPB between the iMil and control groups (30% vs 28%, respectively; absolute difference, 2%; 95% confidence interval [CI], -14 to 18; P = 0.78). There was also no difference in RV failure between the iMil and control groups (15% vs 14%, respectively; difference, 1%; 95% CI, -13 to 12; P = 0.94). Mortality was increased in patients with RV failure vs those without (22% vs 2%, respectively; P < 0.001).
In high-risk cardiac surgery patients with PH, the prophylactic use of iMil was associated with favourable hemodynamic effects that did not translate into improvement of clinically relevant endpoints. This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov; identifier: NCT00819377.
吸入米力农(iMil)已用于治疗肺动脉高压(PH),但其在促进体外循环(CPB)脱离及预防右心室(RV)功能障碍方面的疗效、安全性和预防作用尚未在临床试验中得到评估。本研究的目的是调查在CPB前给予iMil在促进CPB脱离方面是否优于安慰剂。
将患有PH的高危心脏手术患者在麻醉诱导后且CPB前随机分为接受iMil或安慰剂组。通过肺动脉导管插入术和经食管超声心动图评估血流动力学参数和RV功能。比较两组CPB脱离难度这一主要结局。所检查的次要结局包括PH严重程度的降低、RV衰竭的发生率和死亡率。
在124例随机分组的患者中,平均(标准差[SD])欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统(EuroSCORE)II为8.0(2.6),基线平均(SD)收缩期肺动脉压(SPAP)为53(9)mmHg。使用iMil与心输出量增加(P = 0.03)和SPAP降低(P = 0.04)相关,且无全身性低血压。然而,iMil组和对照组CPB困难或复杂脱离的合并发生率无差异(分别为30%和28%;绝对差异为2%;95%置信区间[CI],-14至18;P = 0.78)。iMil组和对照组之间RV衰竭也无差异(分别为15%和14%;差异为1%;95%CI,-13至12;P = 0.94)。与无RV衰竭的患者相比,RV衰竭患者的死亡率增加(分别为22%和2%;P < 0.001)。
在患有PH的高危心脏手术患者中,预防性使用iMil具有良好的血流动力学效应,但未转化为临床相关终点的改善。本试验已在ClinicalTrials.gov注册;标识符:NCT00819377。