Kadoya Noriyuki, Nakajima Yujiro, Saito Masahide, Miyabe Yuki, Kurooka Masahiko, Kito Satoshi, Fujita Yukio, Sasaki Motoharu, Arai Kazuhiro, Tani Kensuke, Yagi Masashi, Wakita Akihisa, Tohyama Naoki, Jingu Keiichi
Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Department of Radiation Oncology, Tohoku University Graduate School of Medicine, Sendai, Japan.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2016 Oct 1;96(2):422-431. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.05.012. Epub 2016 May 19.
To assess the accuracy of the commercially available deformable image registration (DIR) software for thoracic images at multiple institutions.
Thoracic 4-dimensional (4D) CT images of 10 patients with esophageal or lung cancer were used. Datasets for these patients were provided by DIR-lab (dir-lab.com) and included a coordinate list of anatomic landmarks (300 bronchial bifurcations) that had been manually identified. Deformable image registration was performed between the peak-inhale and -exhale images. Deformable image registration error was determined by calculating the difference at each landmark point between the displacement calculated by DIR software and that calculated by the landmark.
Eleven institutions participated in this study: 4 used RayStation (RaySearch Laboratories, Stockholm, Sweden), 5 used MIM Software (Cleveland, OH), and 3 used Velocity (Varian Medical Systems, Palo Alto, CA). The ranges of the average absolute registration errors over all cases were as follows: 0.48 to 1.51 mm (right-left), 0.53 to 2.86 mm (anterior-posterior), 0.85 to 4.46 mm (superior-inferior), and 1.26 to 6.20 mm (3-dimensional). For each DIR software package, the average 3-dimensional registration error (range) was as follows: RayStation, 3.28 mm (1.26-3.91 mm); MIM Software, 3.29 mm (2.17-3.61 mm); and Velocity, 5.01 mm (4.02-6.20 mm). These results demonstrate that there was moderate variation among institutions, although the DIR software was the same.
We evaluated the commercially available DIR software using thoracic 4D-CT images from multiple centers. Our results demonstrated that DIR accuracy differed among institutions because it was dependent on both the DIR software and procedure. Our results could be helpful for establishing prospective clinical trials and for the widespread use of DIR software. In addition, for clinical care, we should try to find the optimal DIR procedure using thoracic 4D-CT data.
评估多个机构中商用可变形图像配准(DIR)软件对胸部图像的准确性。
使用了10例食管癌或肺癌患者的胸部四维(4D)CT图像。这些患者的数据集由DIR-lab(dir-lab.com)提供,包括已手动识别的解剖标志(300个支气管分叉)的坐标列表。在吸气峰值和呼气峰值图像之间进行可变形图像配准。通过计算DIR软件计算的位移与标志点计算的位移在每个标志点处的差异来确定可变形图像配准误差。
11个机构参与了本研究:4个使用RayStation(瑞典斯德哥尔摩RaySearch Laboratories公司),5个使用MIM Software(俄亥俄州克利夫兰),3个使用Velocity(加利福尼亚州帕洛阿尔托Varian Medical Systems公司)。所有病例的平均绝对配准误差范围如下:左右方向为0.48至1.51毫米,前后方向为0.53至2.86毫米,上下方向为0.85至4.46毫米,三维方向为1.26至6.20毫米。对于每个DIR软件包,平均三维配准误差(范围)如下:RayStation为3.28毫米(1.26 - 3.91毫米);MIM Software为3.29毫米(2.17 - 3.61毫米);Velocity为5.01毫米(4.02 - 6.20毫米)。这些结果表明,尽管DIR软件相同,但各机构之间存在适度差异。
我们使用来自多个中心的胸部4D-CT图像评估了商用DIR软件。我们的结果表明,DIR准确性因机构而异,因为它既取决于DIR软件,也取决于操作程序。我们的结果可能有助于建立前瞻性临床试验以及DIR软件的广泛应用。此外,对于临床护理,我们应尝试使用胸部4D-CT数据找到最佳的DIR操作程序。