Hirai M, Muramatsu Y, Mizuno S, Kurahashi N, Kurahashi H, Nakamura M
Institute for Developmental Research, Aichi Human Service Center, Kasugai, Aichi, Japan.
Center for Development of Advanced Medical Technology, Jichi Medical University, Shimotsuke, Tochigi, Japan.
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2016 Oct;60(10):969-81. doi: 10.1111/jir.12318. Epub 2016 Aug 1.
Individuals with Williams syndrome (WS) exhibit atypical attentional characteristics when viewing faces. Although atypical configural processing of faces has been reported in WS, the relative strengths of configural and local feature information to capture visual attention in WS remains unclear. We previously demonstrated that attentional capture by target-unrelated upright faces differs depending on what response is measured. Whereas eye movements reflected subtle atypical attentional properties at the late stage of visual search, manual responses could not capture the atypical attentional profiles towards target-unrelated upright faces in individuals with WS. Here we used the same experimental paradigm to assess whether sensitivity to configural facial information is necessary for capturing attention in WS.
We measured both eye movements and manual responses from 17 individuals with WS and 34 typically developing children and adults while they were actively involved in a visual search task with an inverted face distractor. Task measures (reaction time and performance accuracy) and gaze behaviour (initial direction of attention and fixation duration) were analysed for each stimulus.
When the target and the inverted face were displayed in the same search array, reaction times and accuracies in individuals with WS showed similar tendencies as typical controls. Analysis of task and gaze measures revealed that attentional orienting towards inverted faces was not atypical.
Although individuals with WS exhibited atypical gaze behaviour towards upright faces in our previous study, this unusual behaviour disappears if the faces are upside down. These findings suggest that local feature information alone (e.g. eyes) does not contribute to the heightened attention to faces, but configural information appears necessary for drawing attention to faces in individuals with WS, at least in the current experimental paradigm.
威廉姆斯综合征(WS)患者在观看面部时表现出非典型的注意力特征。尽管已有报道称WS患者对面部的构型加工存在非典型性,但在WS中,构型和局部特征信息捕捉视觉注意力的相对强度仍不清楚。我们之前证明,与目标无关的直立面孔引起的注意力捕捉因所测量的反应不同而有所差异。在视觉搜索后期,眼动反映了细微的非典型注意力特性,而手动反应无法捕捉WS患者对与目标无关的直立面孔的非典型注意力特征。在此,我们使用相同的实验范式来评估对构型面部信息的敏感性是否是WS患者捕捉注意力所必需的。
我们测量了17名WS患者以及34名发育正常的儿童和成年人在积极参与带有倒置面孔干扰物的视觉搜索任务时的眼动和手动反应。分析了每个刺激的任务指标(反应时间和表现准确性)和注视行为(注意力的初始方向和注视持续时间)。
当目标和倒置面孔显示在同一搜索阵列中时,WS患者的反应时间和准确性与典型对照组表现出相似的趋势。对任务和注视指标的分析表明,对倒置面孔的注意力定向并无异常。
尽管在我们之前的研究中,WS患者对直立面孔表现出非典型的注视行为,但如果面孔倒置,这种异常行为就会消失。这些发现表明,仅局部特征信息(如眼睛)并不会导致对面部的注意力增强,但构型信息似乎是吸引WS患者对面部注意力所必需的,至少在当前的实验范式中如此。