• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

The report of the U.S. Task Force on Organ Transplantation: criticisms and alternatives.

作者信息

Kamm F M

出版信息

Mt Sinai J Med. 1989 May;56(3):207-20.

PMID:2747685
Abstract

This article discusses the recommendations for the acquisition and distribution of organs in the Report of the U.S. Task Force on Organ Transplantation. It first considers several possible means of acquiring organs and offers a conception of the relations which a person, his or her family, and the state have to the bodily remains. The article then examines the idea of need for organs and considers certain principles for weighing outcome and need in distribution decisions. It also criticizes the report's recommendations for the distribution of blood type O material, offers a proposal for line-jumping, and criticizes the report's arguments for federal subsidy of organ transplantation.

摘要

相似文献

1
The report of the U.S. Task Force on Organ Transplantation: criticisms and alternatives.
Mt Sinai J Med. 1989 May;56(3):207-20.
2
Procurement and allocation policies: should receiving depend on willingness to give?采购与分配政策:接受是否应取决于给予的意愿?
Mt Sinai J Med. 1989 May;56(3):202-6.
3
National Organ Transplant Act: Public Law 98-507.《国家器官移植法》:第98 - 507号公法。
US Statut Large. 1984 Oct 19;98:2339-48.
4
Organ transplantation: who decides?器官移植:谁来做决定?
Soc Work. 1990 Jul;35(4):322-7.
5
Report of the Massachusetts Task Force on Organ Transplantation.马萨诸塞州器官移植特别工作组报告。
Law Med Health Care. 1985 Feb;13(1):8-26.
6
Organ allocation.器官分配
Transplant Proc. 1988 Feb;20(1 Suppl. 1):1011-32.
7
Procurement and allocation of solid organs for transplantation.用于移植的实体器官的采购与分配。
N Engl J Med. 1997 Feb 6;336(6):422-31. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199702063360607.
8
Are transplanted organs being allocated unfairly and illegally?移植器官的分配是否存在不公平和非法的情况?
Healthspan. 1993 Jun;10(6):14-7.
9
Whose tissues are they anyway? A proposal for state ownership of the human body and its parts.它们到底是谁的组织?关于人体及其各部分归国家所有的提议。
J Cardiovasc Diagn Proced. 1994;12(3):145-9.
10
A test of ethical principles.一项道德原则测试。
Bus Health. 1986 Apr;3(5):11, 14-6.

引用本文的文献

1
Ethics Consultation for Adult Solid Organ Transplantation Candidates and Recipients: A Single Centre Experience.成人实体器官移植候选人和受者的伦理咨询:单中心经验。
J Bioeth Inq. 2021 Jul;18(2):291-303. doi: 10.1007/s11673-021-10092-5. Epub 2021 Feb 26.
2
Does a patient's health potential affect the social valuation of health services?患者的健康潜力会影响对卫生服务的社会评价吗?
PLoS One. 2018 Apr 24;13(4):e0192585. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0192585. eCollection 2018.