• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

巴西里约热内卢瓜纳巴拉湾痕量金属的生态风险:指数分析方法。

Ecological risks of trace metals in Guanabara Bay, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: An index analysis approach.

机构信息

Universidade Federal Fluminense, Instituto de Geociências, Departamento de Geologia e Geofísica Marinha, Avenida General Milton Tavares de Souza, s/n, Niterói, 24210-346 RJ, Brazil.

Universidade Federal Fluminense, Instituto de Geociências, Departamento de Geologia e Geofísica Marinha, Avenida General Milton Tavares de Souza, s/n, Niterói, 24210-346 RJ, Brazil.

出版信息

Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2016 Nov;133:306-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2016.07.012. Epub 2016 Jul 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.ecoenv.2016.07.012
PMID:27479775
Abstract

Total concentrations of Ni, Cr, Cu, Pb and Zn were determined in surface sediments from 30 stations in Guanabara Bay in 1999 and 2008. An approach using various environmental indices was used to assess contamination status of metals. This approach allowed the comparison with different coastal areas. Background Enrichment Index, Contamination index and Ecological Risk index (Pollution Load Index; Sediment Quality Guideline Quotient and Ecological Risk Index) were calculated for the metals. Results revealed a great load of organic matter and significant increases in Cu and Pb levels between 1999 and 2008. The concentrations of Cr and Zn were of great concern, surpassing the values of Probable Effect Level reference values. In spite of the differences of each index, results effectively revealed the striking contamination in Guanabara Bay concerning trace metals, and also suggested potential risk to local biota. The contamination of the northwest area was notably higher than the rest of the bay. In comparison with some other coastal bays around the world, Guanabara Bay stood out as a remarkably contaminated environment.

摘要

1999 年和 2008 年,在瓜纳巴拉湾的 30 个站点采集了表层沉积物,测定了镍、铬、铜、铅和锌的总量。采用多种环境指数的方法评估了金属的污染状况。这种方法可以与不同的沿海地区进行比较。为这些金属计算了背景富集指数、污染指数和生态风险指数(污染负荷指数、沉积物质量指导值比值和生态风险指数)。结果表明,1999 年至 2008 年间,有机物负荷量很大,铜和铅的含量显著增加。铬和锌的浓度令人担忧,超过了可能效应水平参考值。尽管每个指数的差异,结果有效地揭示了瓜纳巴拉湾关于痕量金属的显著污染,并暗示了对当地生物群的潜在风险。西北区域的污染明显高于湾内其他区域。与世界上其他一些沿海海湾相比,瓜纳巴拉湾是一个污染严重的环境。

相似文献

1
Ecological risks of trace metals in Guanabara Bay, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil: An index analysis approach.巴西里约热内卢瓜纳巴拉湾痕量金属的生态风险:指数分析方法。
Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2016 Nov;133:306-15. doi: 10.1016/j.ecoenv.2016.07.012. Epub 2016 Jul 30.
2
Environmental assessment concerning trace metals and ecological risks at Guanabara Bay, RJ, Brazil.巴西里约热内卢瓜纳巴拉湾痕量金属与生态风险的环境评估
Environ Monit Assess. 2018 Jul 4;190(8):448. doi: 10.1007/s10661-018-6833-x.
3
Ecological risk evaluation of sediment metals in a tropical Euthrophic Bay, Guanabara Bay, Southeast Atlantic.东南大西洋热带富营养化海湾——瓜纳巴拉湾沉积物金属的生态风险评估
Mar Pollut Bull. 2016 Aug 15;109(1):435-445. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.05.030. Epub 2016 Jun 11.
4
Source identification and assessment of sediment contamination of trace metals in Kogarah Bay, NSW, Australia.澳大利亚新南威尔士州科加拉湾沉积物中痕量金属污染的来源识别与评估。
Environ Monit Assess. 2015 Feb;187(2):20. doi: 10.1007/s10661-014-4238-z. Epub 2015 Jan 28.
5
Use of GIS for the evaluation of heavy metal contamination in the Cunha Canal watershed and west of the Guanabara Bay, Rio de Janeiro, RJ.利用 GIS 对里约热内卢州瓜纳巴拉湾西部和库尼亚运河流域的重金属污染进行评估。
Mar Pollut Bull. 2014 Dec 15;89(1-2):75-84. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2014.10.033. Epub 2014 Nov 7.
6
Trace metals in the surface sediments of the intertidal Jiaozhou Bay, China: Sources and contamination assessment.中国胶州湾潮间带表层沉积物中的微量元素:来源与污染评价。
Mar Pollut Bull. 2016 Mar 15;104(1-2):371-8. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.01.019. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
7
Assessment of trace inorganic contaminates in water and sediment to address its impact on common fish varieties along Kuwait Bay.评估水中和沉积物中的痕量无机污染物,以了解其对科威特湾常见鱼类品种的影响。
Environ Geochem Health. 2021 Feb;43(2):855-883. doi: 10.1007/s10653-020-00559-6. Epub 2020 Apr 25.
8
The contribution of heavy metal pollution derived from highway runoff to Guanabara Bay sediments--Rio de Janeiro/Brazil.公路径流产生的重金属污染对瓜纳巴拉湾沉积物的影响——巴西里约热内卢
An Acad Bras Cienc. 2007 Dec;79(4):739-50. doi: 10.1590/s0001-37652007000400013.
9
Using lead isotopes and potentially toxic elements to trace pollutant sources in the northern region of Guanabara Bay, southeastern Brazil.利用铅同位素和潜在有毒元素追踪巴西东南部瓜纳巴拉湾北部地区的污染物来源。
Mar Pollut Bull. 2019 Jul;144:216-223. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2019.04.057. Epub 2019 May 16.
10
Integrating multiple lines of evidence of sediment quality in a tropical bay (Guanabara Bay, Brazil).整合热带海湾(巴西瓜纳巴拉湾)沉积物质量的多种证据。
Mar Pollut Bull. 2019 Sep;146:925-934. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2019.07.051. Epub 2019 Jul 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Urban Mangroves Under Threat: Metagenomic Analysis Reveals a Surge in Human and Plant Pathogenic Fungi.城市红树林面临威胁:宏基因组分析揭示人类和植物致病真菌激增。
Pathogens. 2025 Aug 1;14(8):759. doi: 10.3390/pathogens14080759.
2
Seaweed functional strategies, functional groups, and taxon dynamics through a 213-year historical series of Rio De Janeiro Bay.通过里约热内卢湾长达 213 年的历史系列,研究海藻的功能策略、功能群和分类群动态。
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 29;14(1):25932. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-77284-y.
3
Species in an Urban Tropical Estuary: Antimicrobial Susceptibility, Interaction with Environmental Parameters, and Possible Public Health Outcomes.
城市热带河口的物种:抗菌药敏性、与环境参数的相互作用及可能的公共卫生结果
Microorganisms. 2021 May 7;9(5):1007. doi: 10.3390/microorganisms9051007.
4
Microbial community activity in response to multiple contaminant exposure: a feasible tool for sediment quality assessment.微生物群落对多种污染物暴露的响应:评估沉积物质量的一种可行工具。
Environ Monit Assess. 2019 May 23;191(6):392. doi: 10.1007/s10661-019-7532-y.
5
Environmental assessment concerning trace metals and ecological risks at Guanabara Bay, RJ, Brazil.巴西里约热内卢瓜纳巴拉湾痕量金属与生态风险的环境评估
Environ Monit Assess. 2018 Jul 4;190(8):448. doi: 10.1007/s10661-018-6833-x.