Vasu Divi, Michelle M. Chen, Kim F. Rhoads, Davud B. Sirjani, F. Christopher Holsinger, Jennifer L. Shah, and Wendy Hara, Stanford University Medical Center, Stanford; Vasu Divi and Davud B. Sirjani, Palo Alto VA, Palo Alto, CA; and Brian Nussenbaum, Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO.
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Nov 10;34(32):3892-3897. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2016.67.3863.
Purpose Multiple smaller studies have demonstrated an association between overall survival and lymph node (LN) count from neck dissection in patients with head and neck cancer. This is a large cohort study to examine these associations by using a national cancer database. Patients and Methods The National Cancer Database was used to identify patients who underwent upfront nodal dissection for mucosal head and neck squamous cell carcinoma between 2004 and 2013. Patients were stratified by LN count into those with < 18 nodes and those with ≥ 18 nodes on the basis of prior work. A multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression model was constructed to predict hazard of mortality. Stratified models predicted hazard of mortality both for patients who were both node negative and node positive. Results There were 45,113 patients with ≥ 18 LNs and 18,865 patients with < 18 LNs examined. The < 18 LN group, compared with the ≥ 18 LN group, had more favorable tumor characteristics, with a lower proportion of T3 and T4 lesions (27.9% v 39.8%), fewer patients with positive nodes (46.6% v 60.5%), and lower rates of extracapsular extension (9.3% v 15.1%). Risk-adjusted Cox models predicting hazard of mortality by LN count showed an 18% increased hazard of death for patients with < 18 nodes examined (hazard ratio [HR] 1.18; 95% CI, 1.13 to 1.22). When stratified by clinical nodal stage, there was an increased hazard of death in both groups (node negative: HR, 1.24; 95% CI, 1.17 to 1.32; node positive: HR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.05 to 1.19). Conclusion The results of our study demonstrate a significant overall survival advantage in both patients who are clinically node negative and node positive when ≥ 18 LNs are examined after neck dissection, which suggests that LN count is a potential quality metric for neck dissection.
多项小型研究表明,头颈部癌症患者颈部清扫术后的淋巴结(LN)计数与总生存率之间存在关联。本研究使用国家癌症数据库进行了一项大型队列研究,以检查这些关联。
使用国家癌症数据库,确定 2004 年至 2013 年间接受黏膜头颈部鳞状细胞癌初始淋巴结清扫术的患者。根据先前的研究,根据 LN 计数将患者分为 LN 计数<18 个的患者和 LN 计数≥18 个的患者。构建多变量 Cox 比例风险回归模型来预测死亡率的风险。分层模型预测了淋巴结阴性和淋巴结阳性患者的死亡率风险。
共检查了 45113 例 LN 计数≥18 个的患者和 18865 例 LN 计数<18 个的患者。与 LN 计数≥18 个的患者相比,LN 计数<18 个的患者具有更有利的肿瘤特征,T3 和 T4 病变的比例较低(27.9%对 39.8%),阳性淋巴结患者的比例较低(46.6%对 60.5%),且包膜外扩展的发生率较低(9.3%对 15.1%)。通过 LN 计数预测死亡率风险的风险调整 Cox 模型显示,LN 计数<18 个的患者死亡风险增加 18%(风险比 [HR] 1.18;95%CI,1.13 至 1.22)。按临床淋巴结分期分层时,两组的死亡风险均增加(淋巴结阴性:HR,1.24;95%CI,1.17 至 1.32;淋巴结阳性:HR,1.12;95%CI,1.05 至 1.19)。
本研究结果表明,在颈清扫术后检查 LN 计数≥18 个时,临床淋巴结阴性和阳性的患者均具有显著的总生存优势,这表明 LN 计数是颈清扫术的潜在质量指标。