He Dandan, Chiou Jiachi, Zeng Zhenling, Chan Edward Wai-Chi, Liu Jian-Hua, Chen Sheng
College of Veterinary Medicine, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Veterinary Pharmaceutics Development and Safety Evaluation, National Reference Laboratory of Veterinary Drug Residues (SCAU), South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, People's Republic of China Shenzhen Key Laboratory for Food Biological Safety Control, Food Safety and Technology Research Center, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Shen Zhen Research Institute, Shenzhen, People's Republic of China.
Shenzhen Key Laboratory for Food Biological Safety Control, Food Safety and Technology Research Center, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Shen Zhen Research Institute, Shenzhen, People's Republic of China State Key Laboratory of Chiroscience, Department of Applied Biology and Chemical Technology, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, Hong Kong SAR.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016 Sep 23;60(10):6084-90. doi: 10.1128/AAC.00917-16. Print 2016 Oct.
Clinical isolates producing hybrid CTX-M β-lactamases, presumably due to recombination between the blaCTX-M-15 and blaCTX-M-14 elements, have emerged in recent years. Among the hybrid enzymes, CTX-M-64 and CTX-M-14 display the most significant difference in catalytic activity. This study aims to investigate the mechanisms underlying such differential enzymatic activities in order to provide insight into the structure/function relationship of this class of enzymes. Sequence alignment analysis showed that the major differences between the amino acid composition of CTX-M-64 and CTX-M-14 lie at both the N and C termini of the enzymes. Single or multiple amino acid substitutions introduced into CTX-M-64 and CTX-M-14 were found to produce only minor effects on hydrolytic functions; such a finding is consistent with the notion that the discrepancy between the functional activities of the two enzymes is not the result of only a few amino acid changes but is attributable to interactions between a unique set of amino acid residues in each enzyme. This theory is supported by the results of the thermal stability assay, which confirmed that CTX-M-64 is significantly more stable than CTX-M-14. Our data confirmed that, in addition to the important residues located in the active site, residues distal to the active site also contribute to the catalytic activity of the enzyme through stabilizing its structural integrity.
近年来出现了产生杂合CTX-Mβ-内酰胺酶的临床分离株,推测这是由于blaCTX-M-15和blaCTX-M-14元件之间发生了重组。在这些杂合酶中,CTX-M-64和CTX-M-14在催化活性上表现出最显著的差异。本研究旨在探究这种酶活性差异背后的机制,以便深入了解这类酶的结构/功能关系。序列比对分析表明,CTX-M-64和CTX-M-14氨基酸组成的主要差异位于酶的N端和C端。在CTX-M-64和CTX-M-14中引入单个或多个氨基酸替换,发现对水解功能仅产生微小影响;这一发现与以下观点一致,即这两种酶功能活性的差异并非仅由少数氨基酸变化导致,而是归因于每种酶中一组独特氨基酸残基之间的相互作用。热稳定性测定结果支持了这一理论,该结果证实CTX-M-64比CTX-M-14稳定得多。我们的数据证实,除了位于活性位点的重要残基外,活性位点远端的残基也通过稳定酶的结构完整性对其催化活性有贡献。