Mietchen Jonathan J, Bennett David P, Huff Trevor, Hedges Dawson W, Gale Shawn D
1Department of Psychology,Brigham Young University,Provo,Utah.
2Neuroscience Center,Brigham Young University,Provo,Utah.
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2016 Sep;22(8):839-50. doi: 10.1017/S1355617716000643. Epub 2016 Aug 2.
Evaluate the association between pediatric sleep-disordered breathing (SDB) and executive functioning.
We searched multiple electronic databases for peer-reviewed journal articles related to pediatric SDB and executive functioning. We included studies that assessed SDB via polysomnography, included objective or questionnaire measures of executive function, and had an age-matched control group. Fourteen articles met inclusion criteria with a total sample of 1697 children ages 5 to 17 years (M=9.81 years; SD=0.34). We calculated an overall effect size for each of the five executive domains (vigilance, inhibition, working memory, shifting, and generativity) as well as effect sizes according to SDB severity: mild, moderate, severe. We also calculated effect sizes separately for objective and subjective questionnaires of executive functioning.
We found a medium effect size (-0.427) for just one of five executive function domains on objective neuropsychological measures (generativity). In contrast, effect sizes on all three executive domains measured via questionnaire data were significant, with effect sizes ranging from medium (-0.64) to large (-1.06). We found no difference between executive domains by severity of SDB.
This meta-analysis of executive function separated into five domains in pediatric SDB suggested lower performance in generativity on objective neuropsychological measures. There were no differences associated with SDB severity. Questionnaire data suggested dysfunction across the three executive domains measured (inhibition, working memory, shifting). Overall, limited evidence suggested poorer performance in executive function in children with SDB according to objective testing, and subjective ratings of executive function suggested additional worsened performance. (JINS, 2016, 22, 839-850).
评估儿童睡眠呼吸障碍(SDB)与执行功能之间的关联。
我们在多个电子数据库中搜索了与儿童SDB和执行功能相关的同行评审期刊文章。我们纳入了通过多导睡眠图评估SDB、包括执行功能的客观或问卷调查测量、且有年龄匹配对照组的研究。14篇文章符合纳入标准,总样本为1697名5至17岁的儿童(M = 9.81岁;SD = 0.34)。我们计算了五个执行领域(警觉性、抑制、工作记忆、转换和生成性)中每个领域的总体效应量,以及根据SDB严重程度(轻度、中度、重度)计算的效应量。我们还分别计算了执行功能客观和主观问卷的效应量。
在客观神经心理学测量中,五个执行功能领域中只有一个领域(生成性)的效应量为中等(-0.427)。相比之下,通过问卷数据测量的所有三个执行领域的效应量均显著,效应量范围从中等(-0.64)到较大(-1.06)。我们发现SDB严重程度在各执行领域之间没有差异。
这项对儿童SDB中分为五个领域的执行功能的荟萃分析表明,在客观神经心理学测量中,生成性方面的表现较低。与SDB严重程度无关。问卷数据表明,在测量的三个执行领域(抑制、工作记忆、转换)存在功能障碍。总体而言,有限的证据表明,根据客观测试,SDB儿童的执行功能表现较差,而执行功能的主观评分表明表现进一步恶化。(《神经心理学杂志》,2016年,22卷,839 - 850页)