Kim Eileen, Voaklander Rebecca, Kasmin Franklin E, Brown William H, Mannan Rifat, Siegel Jerome H
All of the authors are affiliated with Mount Sinai Beth Israel in New York, New York. Dr Kim and Dr Voaklander are residents in the Department of Internal Medicine. Dr Mannan is a resident in the Department of Pathology. Dr Kasmin, Dr Brown, and Dr Siegel are attending physicians in the Department of Internal Medicine and codirectors of the Advanced Fellowship in Therapeutic Endoscopy. Dr Siegel is also a clinical professor of medicine at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai in New York, New York.
Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2015 Sep;11(9):606-11.
Autoimmune pancreatitis (AIP), a clinical entity originally described in East Asia and more recently recognized in the United States and Europe, poses a diagnostic conundrum for clinicians in the West due to immunoglobulin G4 seronegativity. Although expert panels classify this disease into 2 types, it remains difficult to stratify the disease given that both types share most clinical, biochemical, and imaging characteristics. The classic presentation of AIP can mimic that of pancreatic carcinoma, which increases the urgency of evaluation, diagnosis, and treatment. In this article, we elucidate the differences between the 2 types of AIP, highlight the shortcomings of the current classification system, and propose a more inclusive view of the disorder.
自身免疫性胰腺炎(AIP)最初在东亚被描述,最近在美国和欧洲也得到了认可,由于免疫球蛋白G4血清阴性,给西方临床医生带来了诊断难题。尽管专家小组将这种疾病分为2型,但鉴于这两种类型具有大多数临床、生化和影像学特征,因此仍然难以对该疾病进行分层。AIP的典型表现可能与胰腺癌相似,这增加了评估、诊断和治疗的紧迫性。在本文中,我们阐明了两种类型AIP之间的差异,强调了当前分类系统的缺点,并提出了对该疾病更具包容性的观点。