Müller-Lutz Anja, Cronenberg Tom, Schleich Christoph, Wickrath Frithjof, Zaiss Moritz, Boos Johannes, Wittsack Hans-Jörg
University Dusseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Dusseldorf, Germany.
Department of Medical Physics in Radiology, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
Magn Reson Med. 2017 Jul;78(1):280-284. doi: 10.1002/mrm.26362. Epub 2016 Aug 3.
To investigate, if a train of spin-lock pulses (chemical exchange saturation transfer with spin-lock pulses = CESL) improves biochemical glycosaminoglycan imaging compared with conventional chemical exchange saturation transfer with Gaussian-shaped pulses (CEST) in lumbar intervertebral discs.
T , CEST, and CESL imaging was performed in lumbar intervertebral discs of 15 healthy volunteers at 3 Tesla. Mean and standard deviation of the asymmetric magnetization transfer ratio (MTR ), the asymmetric spin-lock ratio (SLR ) and T values were calculated for nucleus pulposus (NP) and annulus fibrosus (AF). Wilcoxon test was used to analyze differences between MTR and SLR . Pearson correlation was used to determine the relationship between MTR , SLR and T .
Data showed no significant difference between MTR and SLR (NP: P = 0.35; AF: P = 0.34). MTR and SLR values differed significantly between NP and AF (MTR : P = 0.014, SLR : P = 0.005). T values correlated significantly with MTR (NP: ρ = 0.76, P < 0.001; AF: ρ = 0.60, P < 0.001) and SLR (NP: ρ = 0.73, P < 0.001; AF: ρ = 0.47, P < 0.001).
CESL does not improve the chemical exchange asymmetry effect compared with conventional CEST, but leads to comparable results. Magn Reson Med 78:280-284, 2017. © 2016 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.
研究与传统的采用高斯形脉冲的化学交换饱和转移(CEST)相比,一串自旋锁定脉冲(采用自旋锁定脉冲的化学交换饱和转移=CESL)是否能改善腰椎间盘的生物化学糖胺聚糖成像。
对15名健康志愿者的腰椎间盘在3特斯拉场强下进行T2、CEST和CESL成像。计算髓核(NP)和纤维环(AF)的不对称磁化转移率(MTRasym)、不对称自旋锁定率(SLRasym)和T2值的平均值及标准差。采用Wilcoxon检验分析MTRasym和SLRasym之间的差异。采用Pearson相关性分析确定MTRasym、SLRasym和T2之间的关系。
数据显示MTRasym和SLRasym之间无显著差异(NP:P = 0.35;AF:P = 0.34)。NP和AF之间的MTRasym和SLRasym值存在显著差异(MTRasym:P = 0.014,SLRasym:P = 0.005)。T2值与MTRasym(NP:ρ = 0.76,P < 0.001;AF:ρ = 0.60,P < 0.001)和SLRasym(NP:ρ = 0.73,P < 0.001;AF:ρ = 0.47,P < 0.001)显著相关。
与传统CEST相比,CESL并未改善化学交换不对称效应,但能得到类似的结果。《磁共振医学》78:280 - 284, 2017。© 2016国际磁共振医学学会。