Fend F, Mikuz G, Ott G, Rothmund J
Department of Pathology, University of Innsbruck, Tirol, Austria.
Pathol Res Pract. 1989 Mar;184(3):312-7. doi: 10.1016/S0344-0338(89)80092-5.
The aim of our study was to assess the diagnostic value of combined transbronchial lung biopsy (TBB) and bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) in non-immunosuppressed patients, who underwent routine bronchoscopy for evaluation of interstitial lung disease. We examined routinely sampled and processed material from 87 patients from two peripheral pulmological centers and compared the lavage and biopsy results to the final clinical outcome. 22 of these patients showed no evidence of interstitial lung disease during the course of follow-up. Sufficient lung parenchyma was present in 81 of 91 biopsy specimens (including four repeat biopsies), and 79 of 91 BAL samples were considered adequate. The combination of BAL and TBB was more efficient (efficiency 80.3% vs. 67.9% in TBB and 64.6% in BAL) than either method alone. Sensitivity showed a similar increase from 58.8% in TBB and 73.9% in BAL to 79.5% for both combined. Specificity for BAL was a low 60.7% due to contamination by inflammatory cells from upper airways, whereas specificity for TBB was 100%. We conclude that the combination of bronchoalveolar lavage and transbronchial lung biopsy is a valuable tool in the evaluation of interstitial lung disease and should be employed whenever possible.
我们研究的目的是评估经支气管肺活检(TBB)和支气管肺泡灌洗(BAL)联合应用于非免疫抑制患者的诊断价值,这些患者因间质性肺疾病接受常规支气管镜检查以进行评估。我们检查了来自两个外周肺病中心的87例患者的常规采样和处理的材料,并将灌洗和活检结果与最终临床结果进行比较。其中22例患者在随访过程中未显示间质性肺疾病的证据。91例活检标本中有81例(包括4例重复活检)存在足够的肺实质,91例BAL样本中有79例被认为足够。BAL和TBB联合应用比单独使用任何一种方法更有效(有效率分别为80.3%,TBB为67.9%,BAL为64.6%)。敏感性也有类似提高,TBB为58.8%,BAL为73.9%,联合应用时两者均为79.5%。由于上呼吸道炎症细胞污染,BAL的特异性较低,为60.7%,而TBB的特异性为100%。我们得出结论,支气管肺泡灌洗和经支气管肺活检联合应用是评估间质性肺疾病的一种有价值的工具,应尽可能采用。