O'Hara Blythe J, Gale Joanne, McGill Bronwyn, Bauman Adrian, Hebden Lana, Allman-Farinelli Margaret, Maxwell Michelle, Phongsavan Philayrath
1 Prevention Research Collaboration, Sydney School of Public Health and Charles Perkins Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
2 Discipline of Nutrition and Dietetics, School of Life and Environmental Sciences, Charles Perkins Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.
Am J Health Promot. 2017 Nov;31(6):491-501. doi: 10.1177/0890117116660776. Epub 2016 Aug 2.
This study investigated whether participants in a 6-month telephone-based coaching program, who set physical activity, nutrition, and weight loss goals had better outcomes in these domains.
Quasi-experimental design.
The Australian Get Healthy Information and Coaching Service (GHS), a free population-wide telephone health-coaching service that includes goal setting as a key component of its coaching program.
Consenting GHS coaching participants who had completed coaching between February 2009 and December 2012 (n = 4108).
At baseline, participants select a goal for the coaching program, and sociodemographic variables are collected. Self-reported weight, height, waist circumference, physical activity, and nutrition-related behaviors are assessed at baseline and 6 months.
Descriptive analysis was performed on key sociodemographic variables, and the relationship between goal type and change in health outcomes was assessed using a series of linear mixed models that modeled change from baseline to 6 months.
Participants who set goals in relation to weight management and physical activity achieved better results in these areas than those who set alternate goals, losing more than those who set alternate goals (1.5 kg and 0.9 cm in waist circumference) and increasing walking per week (40 minutes), respectively. There was no difference in food-related outcomes for those that set nutrition-related goals.
Goal setting for weight management and increasing physical activity in the overweight and obese population, undertaken in a telephone-based coaching program, can be effective.
本研究调查了参加为期6个月电话辅导计划的参与者,他们设定了身体活动、营养和减肥目标,在这些方面是否能取得更好的成果。
准实验设计。
澳大利亚健康信息与辅导服务(GHS),一项面向全体人群的免费电话健康辅导服务,该服务将目标设定作为其辅导计划的关键组成部分。
2009年2月至2012年12月期间完成辅导的GHS辅导计划的同意参与者(n = 4108)。
在基线时,参与者为辅导计划选择一个目标,并收集社会人口统计学变量。在基线和6个月时评估自我报告的体重、身高、腰围、身体活动和营养相关行为。
对关键社会人口统计学变量进行描述性分析,并使用一系列线性混合模型评估目标类型与健康结果变化之间的关系,这些模型模拟了从基线到6个月的变化。
设定体重管理和身体活动目标的参与者在这些方面取得的结果比设定其他目标的参与者更好,分别比设定其他目标的参与者多减重(1.5千克)、腰围减少更多(0.9厘米)以及每周步行增加(40分钟)。设定营养相关目标的参与者在与食物相关的结果方面没有差异。
在基于电话的辅导计划中,为超重和肥胖人群设定体重管理和增加身体活动的目标可能是有效的。