Department of Infectious Diseases, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China.
Department of Pulmonary Diseases, Wuxi No. 5 People's Hospital, Wuxi 214005, Jiangsu Province, China.
Emerg Microbes Infect. 2016 Aug 3;5(8):e83. doi: 10.1038/emi.2016.80.
The differential diagnosis of tuberculous pleural effusion (TPE) and malignant pleural effusion (MPE) remains difficult despite the availability of numerous diagnostic tools. The current study aimed to evaluate the performance of the whole blood QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube (QFT-GIT) assay and conventional laboratory biomarkers in differential diagnosis of TPE and MPE in high tuberculosis prevalence areas. A total of 117 patients with pleural effusions were recruited, including 91 with TPE and 26 with MPE. All of the patients were tested with QFT-GIT, and the conventional biomarkers in both blood and pleural effusion were detected. The level of antigen-stimulated QFT-GIT in the whole blood of TPE patients was significantly higher than that of MPE (2.89 vs 0.33 IU/mL, P<0.0001). The sensitivity and specificity of QFT-GIT for the diagnosis of TPE were 93.0% and 60.0%, respectively. Among the biomarkers in blood and pleural effusion, pleural adenosine deaminase (ADA) was the most prominent biomarker, with a cutoff value of 15.35 IU/L. The sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of TPE were 93.4% and 96.2%, respectively. The diagnostic classification tree from the combination of these two biomarkers was 97.8% sensitive and 92.3% specific. Ultimately, the combination of whole blood QFT-GIT with pleural ADA improved both the specificity and positive predictive value to 100%. Thus, QFT-GIT is not superior to pleural ADA in the differential diagnosis of TPE and MPE. Combined whole blood QFT-GIT and pleural ADA detection can improve the diagnosis of TPE.
结核性胸腔积液(TPE)和恶性胸腔积液(MPE)的鉴别诊断仍然具有挑战性,尽管有许多诊断工具。本研究旨在评估全血 QuantiFERON-TB Gold In-Tube(QFT-GIT)检测和常规实验室生物标志物在高结核流行地区 TPE 和 MPE 鉴别诊断中的性能。共招募了 117 例胸腔积液患者,其中 91 例为 TPE,26 例为 MPE。所有患者均接受 QFT-GIT 检测,并检测血液和胸腔积液中的常规生物标志物。TPE 患者全血中抗原刺激的 QFT-GIT 水平明显高于 MPE(2.89 比 0.33IU/ml,P<0.0001)。QFT-GIT 诊断 TPE 的敏感性和特异性分别为 93.0%和 60.0%。在血液和胸腔积液中的生物标志物中,胸腔腺苷脱氨酶(ADA)是最显著的标志物,截断值为 15.35IU/L。诊断 TPE 的敏感性和特异性分别为 93.4%和 96.2%。来自这两个标志物的组合的诊断分类树的敏感性为 97.8%,特异性为 92.3%。最终,全血 QFT-GIT 与胸腔 ADA 的联合使用将特异性和阳性预测值提高到 100%。因此,QFT-GIT 在 TPE 和 MPE 的鉴别诊断中并不优于胸腔 ADA。联合全血 QFT-GIT 和胸腔 ADA 检测可提高 TPE 的诊断。