• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

当家作主:家庭法院如何在保护令中执行枪支禁令。

Calling the Shots: How Family Courts Address the Firearms Ban in Protection Orders.

机构信息

1 University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA.

出版信息

Violence Against Women. 2017 Aug;23(9):1140-1151. doi: 10.1177/1077801216656828. Epub 2016 Jul 10.

DOI:10.1177/1077801216656828
PMID:27486128
Abstract

Access to firearms increases the risk of a batterer killing his partner. Moreover, firearms may be more common in homes where intimate partner abuse has occurred. The Violence Against Women Act of 1994 banned possession of firearms by individuals subject to civil protection orders. Yet little research has focused on how this ban is communicated to survivors and batterers. Drawing on systematic observations of protection order hearings, the current study explores factors related to judicial discussion of the ban in court. Implications for improving protection orders and for increasing battered women's safety are discussed.

摘要

获得枪支会增加施虐者杀害伴侣的风险。此外,在发生亲密伴侣虐待的家庭中,枪支可能更为常见。1994 年的《暴力侵害妇女法》禁止受民事保护令限制的个人拥有枪支。然而,很少有研究关注这项禁令是如何传达给幸存者和施虐者的。本研究通过对保护令听证会的系统观察,探讨了与法庭上讨论禁令相关的因素。讨论了改进保护令和提高受虐妇女安全的意义。

相似文献

1
Calling the Shots: How Family Courts Address the Firearms Ban in Protection Orders.当家作主:家庭法院如何在保护令中执行枪支禁令。
Violence Against Women. 2017 Aug;23(9):1140-1151. doi: 10.1177/1077801216656828. Epub 2016 Jul 10.
2
Removing guns from batterers: findings from a pilot survey of domestic violence restraining order recipients in California.从加利福尼亚州的家庭暴力限制令接受者的试点调查中获取的有关收缴施虐者枪支的信息。
Violence Against Women. 2013 May;19(5):602-16. doi: 10.1177/1077801213490561. Epub 2013 Jun 12.
3
Understanding and informing policy implementation: a case study of the domestic violence provisions of the Maryland Gun Violence Act.理解并为政策实施提供信息:以《马里兰州枪支暴力法案》中家庭暴力条款为例的案例研究
Eval Rev. 2006 Jun;30(3):347-60. doi: 10.1177/0193841X06287684.
4
Hate the Players, or the Game? The Role of Court Mediators and Hearing Officers in the Civil Protection Order Process.该恨参与者,还是游戏?法庭调解人和听证官员在民事保护令程序中的作用。
Violence Vict. 2019 Aug 1;34(4):592-612. doi: 10.1891/0886-6708.VV-D-18-00011.
5
The role of firearms in intimate partner violence: policy and research considerations.枪支在亲密伴侣暴力中的作用:政策和研究的考虑因素。
J Public Health Policy. 2020 Jun;41(2):185-195. doi: 10.1057/s41271-019-00198-x.
6
Do laws restricting access to firearms by domestic violence offenders prevent intimate partner homicide?限制家庭暴力罪犯获取枪支的法律能否预防亲密伴侣杀人案?
Eval Rev. 2006 Jun;30(3):313-46. doi: 10.1177/0193841X06287307.
7
Indigenous Partner Violence, Indigenous Sentencing Courts, and Pathways to Desistance.本土伴侣暴力、本土量刑法院与改过自新之路。
Violence Against Women. 2017 Oct;23(12):1513-1535. doi: 10.1177/1077801216662341. Epub 2016 Sep 13.
8
Disarming batterers through restraining orders: the promise and the reality in California.通过限制令制服施暴者:加利福尼亚州的前景与现实
Eval Rev. 2006 Jun;30(3):245-65. doi: 10.1177/0193841X06287675.
9
How the Guardianship System Can Help Address Gun Violence.监护制度如何帮助解决枪支暴力问题。
J Law Med Ethics. 2020 Dec;48(4_suppl):133-136. doi: 10.1177/1073110520979413.
10
Gun Violence Restraining Orders: Alternative or Adjunct to Mental Health-Based Restrictions on Firearms?枪支暴力限制令:基于心理健康的枪支限制的替代措施还是辅助手段?
Behav Sci Law. 2015 Jun;33(2-3):290-307. doi: 10.1002/bsl.2173. Epub 2015 May 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Intimate Partner Violence, Firearm Injuries and Homicides: A Health Justice Approach to Two Intersecting Public Health Crises.亲密伴侣暴力、枪支伤害和凶杀:解决两种公共卫生危机的健康公正方法。
J Law Med Ethics. 2023;51(1):64-76. doi: 10.1017/jme.2023.41. Epub 2023 May 25.