• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Risks and Benefits of Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy and the Effect of Learning Curve on Them.全腹腔镜子宫切除术的风险与益处以及学习曲线对其的影响
J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2016 Oct;66(5):379-84. doi: 10.1007/s13224-015-0706-9. Epub 2015 Jun 11.
2
Laparoscopic hysterectomy: the Kaiser Permanente San Diego experience.腹腔镜子宫切除术:凯撒医疗集团圣地亚哥分院的经验
J Minim Invasive Gynecol. 2005 Jan-Feb;12(1):16-24. doi: 10.1016/j.jmig.2004.12.022.
3
Abdominal, multi-port and single-port total laparoscopic hysterectomy: eleven-year trends comparison of surgical outcomes complications of 936 cases.腹部、多端口与单端口全腹腔镜子宫切除术:936例手术结果及并发症的11年趋势比较
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2015 Jun;291(6):1313-9. doi: 10.1007/s00404-014-3576-y. Epub 2014 Dec 9.
4
Safety of laparoscopy versus laparotomy in early-stage endometrial cancer: a randomised trial.腹腔镜与开腹手术治疗早期子宫内膜癌的安全性比较:一项随机试验。
Lancet Oncol. 2010 Aug;11(8):763-71. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70143-1. Epub 2010 Jul 16.
5
Quality of life after total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy for stage I endometrial cancer (LACE): a randomised trial.腹腔镜子宫切除术与开腹子宫切除术治疗Ⅰ期子宫内膜癌的生活质量比较(LACE):一项随机试验。
Lancet Oncol. 2010 Aug;11(8):772-80. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70145-5. Epub 2010 Jul 16.
6
Improved surgical safety after laparoscopic compared to open surgery for apparent early stage endometrial cancer: results from a randomised controlled trial.腹腔镜手术与开腹手术治疗早期子宫内膜癌的手术安全性比较:一项随机对照试验的结果。
Eur J Cancer. 2012 May;48(8):1147-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2012.02.055.
7
Laparoscopic Supracervical Hysterectomy and Laparoscopic Total Hysterectomy in Patients with Very Large Uteri: a Retrospective Single-Center Experience at a Major University Hospital.大型子宫患者的腹腔镜次全子宫切除术和腹腔镜全子宫切除术:一所大型大学医院的回顾性单中心经验
Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2017 Mar;77(3):251-256. doi: 10.1055/s-0043-102695.
8
Randomized comparison of total laparoscopic, laparoscopically assisted vaginal and vaginal hysterectomies for myomatous uteri.子宫肌瘤患者行全腹腔镜、腹腔镜辅助阴式和阴式子宫切除术的随机对照比较。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2014 Sep;290(3):485-91. doi: 10.1007/s00404-014-3228-2. Epub 2014 Apr 8.
9
A Prospective Randomized Comparative Study of Vaginal, Abdominal, and Laparoscopic Hysterectomies.阴道、腹部及腹腔镜子宫切除术的前瞻性随机对照研究
J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2016 Oct;66(Suppl 1):389-94. doi: 10.1007/s13224-015-0756-z. Epub 2015 Sep 1.
10
A Comparison between Total Abdominal Hysterectomy versus Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy.全腹子宫切除术与全腹腔镜子宫切除术的比较
Gynecol Minim Invasive Ther. 2023 Dec 7;13(1):43-47. doi: 10.4103/gmit.gmit_72_23. eCollection 2024 Jan-Mar.

引用本文的文献

1
Complications of total laparoscopic hysterectomy: A retrospective study of cases performed by a single surgeon.全腹腔镜子宫切除术的并发症:对由单一外科医生实施的病例的回顾性研究。
J Minim Access Surg. 2023 Oct-Dec;19(4):473-477. doi: 10.4103/jmas.jmas_148_22.
2
Learning laparoscopic hysterectomy: analysis of different surgeons' individual learning curves.学习腹腔镜子宫切除术:不同外科医生个体学习曲线分析
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2023 Apr;307(4):1065-1072. doi: 10.1007/s00404-022-06893-7. Epub 2022 Dec 29.
3
The Future in Standards of Care for Gynecologic Laparoscopic Surgery to Improve Training and Education.改善培训与教育的妇科腹腔镜手术护理标准的未来。
J Clin Med. 2022 Apr 14;11(8):2192. doi: 10.3390/jcm11082192.
4
Outcomes of Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy: A Single-Surgeon Experience of Initial 50 Cases.全腹腔镜子宫切除术的手术结果:一位外科医生的前50例手术经验
Cureus. 2021 Jan 12;13(1):e12644. doi: 10.7759/cureus.12644.

本文引用的文献

1
Laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy: a retrospective comparative study.腹腔镜子宫切除术与经腹全子宫切除术:一项回顾性比较研究。
J Med Assoc Thai. 2011 Jan;94(1):8-16.
2
Psychological wellbeing after laparoscopic and abdominal hysterectomy--a randomised controlled multicentre study.腹腔镜与开腹子宫切除术后的心理健康——一项随机对照多中心研究
BJOG. 2006 Sep;113(9):1023-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01025.x.
3
Methods of hysterectomy: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.子宫切除术方法:随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
BMJ. 2005 Jun 25;330(7506):1478. doi: 10.1136/bmj.330.7506.1478.
4
Total laparoscopic hysterectomy versus total abdominal hysterectomy: an assessment of the learning curve in a prospective randomized study.全腹腔镜子宫切除术与经腹全子宫切除术:一项前瞻性随机研究中的学习曲线评估
Hum Reprod. 1999 Dec;14(12):2996-9. doi: 10.1093/humrep/14.12.2996.
5
Surgical complications of diagnostic and operative gynaecological laparoscopy: a series of 29,966 cases.诊断性和手术性妇科腹腔镜检查的手术并发症:29966例病例系列
Hum Reprod. 1998 Apr;13(4):867-72. doi: 10.1093/humrep/13.4.867.
6
Evaluation and the learning curve of the first one hundred laparoscopic hysterectomies.前一百例腹腔镜子宫切除术的评估及学习曲线
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1995 Sep;74(8):638-41. doi: 10.3109/00016349509013478.

全腹腔镜子宫切除术的风险与益处以及学习曲线对其的影响

Risks and Benefits of Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy and the Effect of Learning Curve on Them.

作者信息

Agarwal Poonam, Bindal Neeta, Yadav Reena

机构信息

Obstetrics & Gynecology, DDU Hospital, Hari Nagar, New Delhi, 110064 India.

Obstetrics & Gynecology, ESI Hospital, New Delhi, India.

出版信息

J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2016 Oct;66(5):379-84. doi: 10.1007/s13224-015-0706-9. Epub 2015 Jun 11.

DOI:10.1007/s13224-015-0706-9
PMID:27486285
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4958077/
Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to prospectively analyze the risks and benefits of total laparoscopic hysterectomy (TLH) compared with total abdominal hysterectomy (TAH) and the effects of learning curve on them over 4 years (March 2010-April 2014).

DESIGN

It was a prospective randomized study.

SETTING

The study was conducted in Delhi government hospital which had no staff with previous experience of advanced laparoscopic surgeries.

PATIENTS

Two hundred fifty patients were operated on for benign gynecological conditions (35-65 years). The numbers of cases operated laparoscopically were as follows-22 in 2010, 25 in 2011, 32 in 2012, and 46 in 2013. Equal number. of patients operated by open surgery were taken in the study during the same time period.

RESULTS

Two hundred fifty cases were operated since March 2010, by either laparoscopic or open surgery. Incidence of major complications was-1.6 % for TLH compared to 4 % in TAH. After the first year of surgery, this incidence has fallen to 0 % in subsequent years in TLH group. The incidence of minor complications declined from 14 to 4.5 % in the third year of study. Total rate of conversion to laparotomy was 9.7 %, which again had a significant decline after the first year. TLH also clearly showed superior benefits of less intraoperative blood loss, early postoperative ambulance, and shorter period of hospital stay in comparison with TAH.

CONCLUSION

The study has led us to conclude that TLH is a safe, effective, and reproducible technique after the completion of a period of training necessary to standardize the procedure. This approach must be established in our real, day-to-day clinical practice.

摘要

研究目的

本研究的目的是前瞻性分析全腹腔镜子宫切除术(TLH)与经腹全子宫切除术(TAH)相比的风险和益处,以及学习曲线在4年(2010年3月至2014年4月)内对它们的影响。

设计

这是一项前瞻性随机研究。

地点

该研究在德里政府医院进行,该医院没有工作人员有过先进腹腔镜手术的经验。

患者

250例因良性妇科疾病接受手术的患者(年龄35 - 65岁)。腹腔镜手术的病例数如下:2010年22例,2011年25例,2012年32例,2013年46例。同期接受开放手术的患者数量相同。

结果

自2010年3月以来,250例患者接受了腹腔镜或开放手术。TLH的主要并发症发生率为1.6%,而TAH为4%。手术后第一年之后,TLH组后续年份的这一发生率降至0%。在研究的第三年,轻微并发症的发生率从14%降至4.5%。转为开腹手术的总发生率为9.7%,在第一年之后也有显著下降。与TAH相比,TLH还明显显示出术中失血更少、术后早期出院和住院时间更短的优势。

结论

该研究使我们得出结论,在完成标准化手术所需的一段时间培训后,TLH是一种安全、有效且可重复的技术。这种方法必须在我们实际的日常临床实践中确立。