Suppr超能文献

健康相关生活质量的预测因素及其与生存的关联可能有助于识别预后不良风险较高的结直肠癌患者。

Predictors of health-related quality of life and association with survival may identify colorectal cancer patients at high risk of poor prognosis.

作者信息

Reyes Monica E, Ye Yuanqing, Zhou Yeling, Liang Alexander, Kopetz Scott, Rodriquez M Alma, Wu Xifeng, Hildebrandt Michelle A T

机构信息

Department of Epidemiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.

Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.

出版信息

Qual Life Res. 2017 Feb;26(2):319-330. doi: 10.1007/s11136-016-1381-8. Epub 2016 Aug 4.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To investigate the mediators of health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients and effect on overall survival.

METHODS

We analyzed baseline (within 1 year of diagnosis) SF-12v1 questionnaire data from 3734 CRC patients and assessed the differences in mental composite scores (MCS) and physical composite scores (PCS) by socio-demographics and risks of poor HR-QoL by these factors. Hazard ratios were generated using univariate Cox regression for MCS and PCS dichotomized using the normalized scoring-based mean of 50 and survival estimates generated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Differences in MCS and PCS were identified by sex, age, education level, alcohol use, tobacco use, and stage. Race, marital status, and cancer site differed only by PCS. Being female, never married, former alcohol user, or with stage IV disease significantly increased risk of a poor HR-QoL, with magnitudes of risk from 1.25- to 1.97-fold. Higher education level had a protective effect (MCS: P  = 2.32 × 10; PCS: P  = 5.62 × 10). Hispanics and African-Americans had a 1.35- and 1.57-fold risk of poor PCS, and increase in age had a protective effect for risk of poor MCS (P  = 1.84 × 10). Poor MCS or PCS were associated with poor prognosis and decreased survival at 5 years (HR 1.57, 95 % CI 1.41-1.76 and HR 2.38, 95 % CI 2.08-2.72), and both remained significant when adjusting for age, gender, race, education level, tumor stage, and tumor site.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings identify potential mediators for HR-QoL and suggest that baseline HR-QoL assessment may be prognostic for CRC.

摘要

目的

研究结直肠癌(CRC)患者健康相关生活质量(HR-QoL)的介导因素及其对总生存期的影响。

方法

我们分析了3734例CRC患者的基线(诊断后1年内)SF-12v1问卷数据,并根据社会人口统计学特征评估了心理综合评分(MCS)和身体综合评分(PCS)的差异,以及这些因素导致HR-QoL较差的风险。使用单因素Cox回归生成风险比,将MCS和PCS按基于标准化评分的均值50进行二分法划分,并使用Kaplan-Meier方法生成生存估计值。

结果

MCS和PCS的差异通过性别、年龄、教育水平、饮酒、吸烟和分期来确定。种族、婚姻状况和癌症部位仅在PCS方面存在差异。女性、从未结婚、既往饮酒者或患有IV期疾病会显著增加HR-QoL较差的风险,风险幅度为1.25至1.97倍。较高的教育水平具有保护作用(MCS:P = 2.32×10;PCS:P = 5.62×10)。西班牙裔和非裔美国人的PCS较差风险分别为1.35倍和1.57倍,年龄增加对MCS较差风险具有保护作用(P = 1.84×10)。MCS或PCS较差与预后不良和5年生存率降低相关(风险比1.57,95%置信区间1.41 - 1.76;风险比2.38,95%置信区间2.08 - 2.72),在调整年龄、性别、种族、教育水平、肿瘤分期和肿瘤部位后,两者仍具有显著性。

结论

我们的研究结果确定了HR-QoL的潜在介导因素,并表明基线HR-QoL评估可能对CRC具有预后价值。

相似文献

3
Preoperative quality of life predicts survival following pulmonary resection in stage I non-small-cell lung cancer.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2013 May;43(5):905-10. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezs532. Epub 2012 Oct 22.
4
Socio-demographic, Clinical, and Genetic Determinants of Quality of Life in Lung Cancer Patients.
Sci Rep. 2018 Jul 13;8(1):10640. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-25712-1.
5
Determinants and prognostic value of quality of life in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
Eur J Cancer. 2018 Mar;92:20-32. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2017.12.023. Epub 2018 Feb 3.
6
Association between changes in quality of life and mortality in hemodialysis patients: results from the DOPPS.
Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2017 Mar 1;32(3):521-527. doi: 10.1093/ndt/gfw233.
7
Acute coronary syndrome and predictors of quality of life.
Rev Port Cardiol. 2005 Jun;24(6):819-31.
8
Analysis of longitudinal quality-of-life data in high-risk operable patients with lung cancer: results from the ACOSOG Z4032 (Alliance) multicenter randomized trial.
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2015 Mar;149(3):718-25; discussion 725-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2014.11.003. Epub 2014 Nov 13.

引用本文的文献

3
Patient-Reported Quality of Life at Diagnosis in Adolescent and Young Adults With Cancer.
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2024 Jul 12;22(6):e247012. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2024.7012.
5
Health-Related Quality of Life Scores and Values as Predictors of Mortality: A Scoping Review.
J Gen Intern Med. 2023 Nov;38(15):3389-3405. doi: 10.1007/s11606-023-08380-4. Epub 2023 Aug 31.
7
Determinants of quality of life of cancer patients at a tertiary care medical city in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.
Front Psychiatry. 2023 Feb 8;14:1098176. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1098176. eCollection 2023.
8
Anxiety, depression, health-related quality of life, and mortality among colorectal patients: 5-year follow-up.
Support Care Cancer. 2022 Oct;30(10):7943-7954. doi: 10.1007/s00520-022-07177-1. Epub 2022 Jun 23.
10
Testing of a health-related quality of life model in patients with heart failure: A cross-sectional, correlational study.
Geriatr Nurs. 2022 Mar-Apr;44:105-111. doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2022.01.008. Epub 2022 Jan 29.

本文引用的文献

1
Cancer statistics, 2016.
CA Cancer J Clin. 2016 Jan-Feb;66(1):7-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21332. Epub 2016 Jan 7.
2
Differences in Colorectal Cancer Outcomes by Race and Insurance.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015 Dec 22;13(1):ijerph13010048. doi: 10.3390/ijerph13010048.
3
Patterns of Chronic Conditions and Their Associations With Behaviors and Quality of Life, 2010.
Prev Chronic Dis. 2015 Dec 17;12:E222. doi: 10.5888/pcd12.150179.
6
Type D personality is associated with delaying patients to medical assessment and poor quality of life among rectal cancer survivors.
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2016 Jan;31(1):75-85. doi: 10.1007/s00384-015-2333-4. Epub 2015 Aug 5.
7
Alcohol Consumption, Depression, Insomnia and Colorectal Cancer Screening: Racial Differences.
Int J High Risk Behav Addict. 2015 Jun 20;4(2):e23424. doi: 10.5812/ijhrba.4(2)2015.23424. eCollection 2015 Jun.
9
Psychosocial predictors of health outcomes in colorectal cancer: a comprehensive review.
Cancer Treat Rev. 2014 Jul;40(6):800-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2014.03.001. Epub 2014 Mar 12.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验