Reyes Monica E, Ye Yuanqing, Zhou Yeling, Liang Alexander, Kopetz Scott, Rodriquez M Alma, Wu Xifeng, Hildebrandt Michelle A T
Department of Epidemiology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Department of Gastrointestinal Medical Oncology, University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
Qual Life Res. 2017 Feb;26(2):319-330. doi: 10.1007/s11136-016-1381-8. Epub 2016 Aug 4.
To investigate the mediators of health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) in colorectal cancer (CRC) patients and effect on overall survival.
We analyzed baseline (within 1 year of diagnosis) SF-12v1 questionnaire data from 3734 CRC patients and assessed the differences in mental composite scores (MCS) and physical composite scores (PCS) by socio-demographics and risks of poor HR-QoL by these factors. Hazard ratios were generated using univariate Cox regression for MCS and PCS dichotomized using the normalized scoring-based mean of 50 and survival estimates generated using the Kaplan-Meier method.
Differences in MCS and PCS were identified by sex, age, education level, alcohol use, tobacco use, and stage. Race, marital status, and cancer site differed only by PCS. Being female, never married, former alcohol user, or with stage IV disease significantly increased risk of a poor HR-QoL, with magnitudes of risk from 1.25- to 1.97-fold. Higher education level had a protective effect (MCS: P = 2.32 × 10; PCS: P = 5.62 × 10). Hispanics and African-Americans had a 1.35- and 1.57-fold risk of poor PCS, and increase in age had a protective effect for risk of poor MCS (P = 1.84 × 10). Poor MCS or PCS were associated with poor prognosis and decreased survival at 5 years (HR 1.57, 95 % CI 1.41-1.76 and HR 2.38, 95 % CI 2.08-2.72), and both remained significant when adjusting for age, gender, race, education level, tumor stage, and tumor site.
Our findings identify potential mediators for HR-QoL and suggest that baseline HR-QoL assessment may be prognostic for CRC.
研究结直肠癌(CRC)患者健康相关生活质量(HR-QoL)的介导因素及其对总生存期的影响。
我们分析了3734例CRC患者的基线(诊断后1年内)SF-12v1问卷数据,并根据社会人口统计学特征评估了心理综合评分(MCS)和身体综合评分(PCS)的差异,以及这些因素导致HR-QoL较差的风险。使用单因素Cox回归生成风险比,将MCS和PCS按基于标准化评分的均值50进行二分法划分,并使用Kaplan-Meier方法生成生存估计值。
MCS和PCS的差异通过性别、年龄、教育水平、饮酒、吸烟和分期来确定。种族、婚姻状况和癌症部位仅在PCS方面存在差异。女性、从未结婚、既往饮酒者或患有IV期疾病会显著增加HR-QoL较差的风险,风险幅度为1.25至1.97倍。较高的教育水平具有保护作用(MCS:P = 2.32×10;PCS:P = 5.62×10)。西班牙裔和非裔美国人的PCS较差风险分别为1.35倍和1.57倍,年龄增加对MCS较差风险具有保护作用(P = 1.84×10)。MCS或PCS较差与预后不良和5年生存率降低相关(风险比1.57,95%置信区间1.41 - 1.76;风险比2.38,95%置信区间2.08 - 2.72),在调整年龄、性别、种族、教育水平、肿瘤分期和肿瘤部位后,两者仍具有显著性。
我们的研究结果确定了HR-QoL的潜在介导因素,并表明基线HR-QoL评估可能对CRC具有预后价值。