Martel Clothilde, Vignaud Guillaume, Liozon Eric, Magy Laurent, Gallouedec Gael, Ly Kim, Bezanahary Holly, Cypierre Anne, Lapébie François-Xavier, Palat Sylvain, Gondran Guillaume, Jauberteau Marie-Odile, Fauchais Anne-Laure
Department of Internal Medicine, and Department of Immunology, Limoges University Hospital, France.
Department of Internal Medicine, Limoges University Hospital, France.
Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2016 Sep-Oct;34(5):918-924. Epub 2016 Aug 2.
Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIM) are heterogeneous autoimmune diseases with wide clinical spectrum that may lead to delayed diagnosis. The aim of this study was to examine the impact of IIM-specific dot-blot assay on diagnostic process of patients presenting with muscular or systemic symptoms evocating of IIM.
We collected all the prescriptions of an IIM specific dot-blot assay (8 autoantigens including Jo-1, PL-7, PL-12, SRP, Mi-2, Ku, PM/Scl and Scl-70) over a 38-month period.
316 myositis dot-blot assays (MSD) were performed in 274 patients (156 women, mean age 53±10.6 years) referring for muscular and/or systemic symptoms suggesting IIM. The timing of dot prescription through the diagnostic process was highly variable: without (35%), concomitantly (16%) or after electromyographic studies (35%). Fifty-nine patients (22%) had IIM according to Bohan and Peter's criteria. Among them, 29 (49%) had positive dot (8 Jo-1, 6 PM-Scl, 5 PL-12, 5 SRP, 2 Mi-2, 2 PL-7 and 1 Ku). Various other diagnoses were performed including 35 autoimmune disease or granulomatosis (12%), 19 inflammatory rheumatic disease (7%), 16 non inflammatory muscular disorders (6%), 10 drug-induced myalgia (4%), 11 infectious myositis (4%). Except 11 borderline SRP results and one transient PM-Scl, MSD was positive only in one case of IIM. Dot allowed clinicians to correct diagnosis in 4 cases and improved the diagnosis of IIM subtypes in 4 cases.
This study reflects the interest of myositis dot in the rapid diagnosis process of patients with non-specific muscular symptoms leading to various diagnoses including IIM.
特发性炎性肌病(IIM)是一类具有广泛临床谱的异质性自身免疫性疾病,可能导致诊断延迟。本研究的目的是探讨IIM特异性斑点印迹法对出现提示IIM的肌肉或全身症状患者诊断过程的影响。
我们收集了38个月期间IIM特异性斑点印迹法(包括Jo-1、PL-7、PL-12、SRP、Mi-2、Ku、PM/Scl和Scl-70在内的8种自身抗原)的所有检测记录。
对274例(156例女性,平均年龄53±10.6岁)因肌肉和/或全身症状提示IIM前来就诊的患者进行了316次肌炎斑点印迹检测(MSD)。在诊断过程中进行斑点检测的时间差异很大:未进行(35%)、同时进行(16%)或在肌电图检查之后进行(35%)。根据博汉和彼得标准,59例患者(22%)患有IIM。其中,29例(49%)斑点检测呈阳性(8例Jo-1阳性、6例PM-Scl阳性、5例PL-12阳性、5例SRP阳性、2例Mi-2阳性、2例PL-7阳性和1例Ku阳性)。还做出了各种其他诊断,包括35例自身免疫性疾病或肉芽肿病(12%)、19例炎性风湿性疾病(7%)、16例非炎性肌肉疾病(6%)、10例药物性肌痛(4%)、11例感染性肌炎(4%)。除了11例临界SRP结果和1例短暂性PM-Scl阳性外,MSD仅在1例IIM中呈阳性。斑点印迹法使临床医生在4例中纠正了诊断,并在4例中改善了IIM亚型的诊断。
本研究反映了肌炎斑点印迹法在对具有非特异性肌肉症状、导致包括IIM在内的各种诊断的患者进行快速诊断过程中的作用。