Silva Mauricio, Avoian Tigran, Warnock Robert Sean, Sadlik Gal, Ebramzadeh Edward
aOrthopaedic Institute for Children bThe J. Vernon Luck Orthopaedic Research Center, Orthopaedic Institute for Children cUCLA/Orthopaedic Hospital Department of Orthopaedics, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA.
J Pediatr Orthop B. 2017 Sep;26(5):417-423. doi: 10.1097/BPB.0000000000000372.
Waterproof casting has been reported to increase patient comfort and satisfaction, and decrease skin irritation. There are no available data on the influence of waterproof casting materials on physical function in pediatric patients. Our aim was to determine whether the use of waterproof casting would result in faster recovery of physical function while maintaining similar clinical outcomes as those obtained with nonwaterproof materials. Twenty-six children with nonangulated or minimally angulated distal radius fractures were assigned randomly to initially receive a short-arm cast made of one of two optional materials: a hybrid mesh material with a waterproof lining or fiberglass with a nonwaterproof skin protector. Two weeks later, the initial cast was removed and replaced with a short-arm cast made of the alternative option. We compared the rate of fracture displacement, physical function, pain, skin changes, itchiness, and patient satisfaction. No evidence of displacement was found in either group. The mean Activities Scale for Kids - Performance (ASK-P) (physical function) score was 10% higher during the period of time when a waterproof cast was used (P=0.04). When a waterproof cast was used during the first 2 weeks of treatment, the mean total ASK-P scores were 23% higher than that when a nonwaterproof one was used during the same period of time (P=0.003). Patients who received a waterproof cast as the initial treatment reported lower functional scores overall and in almost every domain of the ASK-P once they were in a nonwaterproof one; similarly, those who received a nonwaterproof cast as the initial treatment reported higher functional scores overall and in every domain of the ASK-P once they were in a waterproof cast. Compared with a nonwaterproof cast, the use of waterproof casting resulted in comparable levels of pain, itchiness, skin irritability, and overall patient satisfaction. The results of this randomized, cross-over trial suggest that the use of waterproof casting material for the treatment of nondisplaced or minimally displaced distal radius fractures in children can result in a faster recovery of physical function, while providing comparable stability, pain, itchiness, skin irritability, and overall patient satisfaction.
II.
据报道,防水石膏可提高患者舒适度和满意度,并减少皮肤刺激。目前尚无关于防水石膏材料对儿科患者身体功能影响的可用数据。我们的目的是确定使用防水石膏是否能在保持与非防水材料相似临床结果的同时,使身体功能恢复得更快。26例无成角或轻度成角的桡骨远端骨折儿童被随机分配,最初接受由两种可选材料之一制成的短臂石膏:一种带有防水衬里的混合网状材料或带有非防水皮肤保护剂的玻璃纤维。两周后,拆除初始石膏,并用另一种材料制成的短臂石膏替换。我们比较了骨折移位率、身体功能、疼痛、皮肤变化、瘙痒和患者满意度。两组均未发现移位迹象。在使用防水石膏期间,儿童活动量表-表现(ASK-P)(身体功能)平均得分高10%(P=0.04)。在治疗的前2周使用防水石膏时,ASK-P总平均得分比同期使用非防水石膏时高23%(P=0.003)。最初接受防水石膏治疗的患者,一旦换成非防水石膏,总体功能得分及ASK-P几乎每个领域的得分都较低;同样,最初接受非防水石膏治疗的患者,一旦换成防水石膏,总体功能得分及ASK-P每个领域的得分都较高。与非防水石膏相比,使用防水石膏在疼痛、瘙痒、皮肤刺激性和患者总体满意度方面相当。这项随机交叉试验的结果表明,使用防水石膏材料治疗儿童无移位或轻度移位的桡骨远端骨折,可使身体功能恢复得更快,同时提供相当的稳定性、疼痛、瘙痒、皮肤刺激性和患者总体满意度。
II级。