Department of Gynaecology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands; Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Department of Pathology, Leiden University Medical Centre, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Eur J Cancer. 2016 Sep;65:139-49. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.07.006. Epub 2016 Aug 3.
There is no consensus on the width of tumour-free margins after surgery for vulvar squamous cell carcinoma (VSCC). Most current guidelines recommend tumour-free margins of ≥8 mm. The aim of this study was to investigate whether a margin of <8 mm is associated with an increased risk of local recurrence in VSCC.
A meta-analysis of the available literature and a cohort study of 148 VSCC patients seen at a referral centre from 2000 to 2012 was performed. The primary end-point of the cohort study was a histologically confirmed ipsilateral local recurrence within 2 years after primary treatment in relation to the margin distance.
Based on 10 studies, the meta-analysis showed that a tumour-free margin of <8 mm is associated with a higher risk of local recurrence compared to a tumour-free margin of ≥8 mm (pooled risk ratio, 1.99 [95% confidence interval {CI}: 1.13-3.51], p = 0.02). In the cohort study, we found no clear difference in the risk of local recurrence in the <8 versus ≥8 mm group; however, 40% of the patients in the <8 mm group received additional treatment. Tumour-positive margin was the only independent risk factor for local recurrence in the multivariable analysis (hazard ratio, 0.21 [95% CI: 0.08-0.55]).
This work provides important data to question the commonly used 8-mm margin as a prognosticator for local recurrence. More research is needed to address the question of whether additional treatment improves the prognosis in patients with a tumour-free margin of <8 mm.
外阴鳞状细胞癌(VSCC)手术后无肿瘤边缘的宽度尚无共识。目前大多数指南建议无肿瘤边缘≥8mm。本研究旨在探讨<8mm 的边缘是否与 VSCC 局部复发风险增加相关。
对现有文献进行荟萃分析,并对 2000 年至 2012 年在一个转诊中心就诊的 148 例 VSCC 患者进行队列研究。队列研究的主要终点是原发性治疗后 2 年内同侧局部复发的组织学证实与边缘距离的关系。
基于 10 项研究,荟萃分析显示,与>8mm 的无肿瘤边缘相比,<8mm 的无肿瘤边缘与局部复发风险较高相关(汇总风险比,1.99[95%置信区间{CI}:1.13-3.51],p=0.02)。在队列研究中,我们未发现<8mm 组与≥8mm 组局部复发风险之间存在明显差异;然而,<8mm 组的 40%患者接受了额外治疗。肿瘤阳性边缘是多变量分析中局部复发的唯一独立危险因素(风险比,0.21[95%CI:0.08-0.55])。
这项工作提供了重要数据,质疑了常用的 8mm 边缘作为局部复发的预后指标。需要进一步研究来解决在无肿瘤边缘<8mm 的患者中,额外治疗是否改善预后的问题。