Hyžný Matúš, Klompmaker Adiël A
Geological-Paleontological Department, Natural History Museum Vienna, Burgring 7, 1010 Vienna, Austria; Matúš Hyžný [
Florida Museum of Natural History, University of Florida, 1659 Museum Road, PO Box 117800, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA; Adiël A. Klompmaker [
Arthropod Syst Phylogeny. 2015 Dec;73(3):401-437.
Ghost shrimps of Callianassidae and Ctenochelidae are soft-bodied, usually heterochelous decapods representing major bioturbators of muddy and sandy (sub)marine substrates. Ghost shrimps have a robust fossil record spanning from the Early Cretaceous (~ 133 Ma) to the Holocene and their remains are present in most assemblages of Cenozoic decapod crustaceans. Their taxonomic interpretation is in flux, mainly because the generic assignment is hindered by their insufficient preservation and disagreement in the biological classification. Furthermore, numerous taxa are incorrectly classified within the catch-all taxon . To show the historical patterns in describing fossil ghost shrimps and to evaluate taphonomic aspects influencing the attribution of ghost shrimp remains to higher level taxa, a database of all fossil species treated at some time as belonging to the group has been compiled: 250 / 274 species are considered valid ghost shrimp taxa herein. More than half of these taxa (160 species, 58.4%) are known only from distal cheliped elements, i.e., dactylus and / or propodus, due to the more calcified cuticle locally. Rarely, ghost shrimps are preserved in burrows or in direct association with them, and several previously unpublished occurrences are reported herein. For generic assignment, fossil material should be compared to living species because many of them have modern relatives. Heterochely, intraspecific variation, ontogenetic changes and sexual dimorphism are all factors that have to be taken into account when working with fossil ghost shrimps. Distal elements are usually more variable than proximal ones. Preliminary results suggest that the ghost shrimp clade emerged not before the Hauterivian (~ 133 Ma). The divergence of Ctenochelidae and Paracalliacinae is estimated to occur within the interval of Hauterivian to Albian (133-100 Ma). Callichirinae and Eucalliacinae likely diverged later during the Late Cretaceous (100-66 Ma), whereas Callianassinae did not appear before the Eocene (56 Ma).
美人虾科和栉螯虾科的幽灵虾是身体柔软的十足目动物,通常具有异型螯,是泥质和沙质(亚)海底基质的主要生物扰动者。幽灵虾拥有丰富的化石记录,从早白垩世(约1.33亿年前)到全新世,其化石遗迹存在于大多数新生代十足目甲壳动物组合中。它们的分类解释尚在变动之中,主要原因是其保存不充分以及生物分类存在分歧,这阻碍了属的归类。此外,众多分类单元被错误地归类到一个笼统的分类群中。为了展现描述化石幽灵虾的历史模式,并评估影响幽灵虾遗迹归为更高分类单元的埋藏学因素,已编制了一个数据库,收录了所有曾在某个时候被视为属于该类群的化石物种:本文认为其中250/274个物种是有效的幽灵虾分类单元。这些分类单元中超过一半(160种,占58.4%)仅通过螯肢远端部分,即指节和/或掌节被知晓,因为这些部位的角质层钙化程度更高。幽灵虾很少保存在洞穴中或与洞穴直接相关联,本文报道了一些此前未发表的此类发现。对于属的归类,化石材料应与现存物种进行比较,因为它们中的许多都有现代亲缘物种。异型螯、种内变异、个体发育变化和两性异形都是研究化石幽灵虾时必须考虑的因素。远端部分通常比近端部分更具变异性。初步结果表明,幽灵虾类群在豪特里维阶(约1.33亿年前)之前并未出现。栉螯虾科和副美人虾亚科的分化估计发生在豪特里维阶到阿尔比阶(1.33 - 1亿年前)的区间内。美人虾亚科和真美人虾亚科可能在晚白垩世后期(1 - 0.66亿年前)分化,而美人虾科直到始新世(5600万年前)才出现。