Becker N, Delorme S
Abteilung Krebsepidemiologie, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, Im Neuenheimer Feld 581, 69120, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
Abteilung Radiologie, Deutsches Krebsforschungszentrum, Im Neuenheimer Feld 280, 69120, Heidelberg, Deutschland.
Radiologe. 2016 Sep;56(9):786-92. doi: 10.1007/s00117-016-0149-z.
The American national lung cancer screening trial (NLST) has provided the first confirmation of a reduction in lung cancer mortality by using low-dose multislice computed tomography (MSCT). Preliminary evaluations of smaller European trials could not confirm such a reduction. The final evaluation of the larger Dutch-Belgian NELSON trial and five other European trials are expected within the next 1-2 years. The results of the completed rounds of screening in all these studies indicate that the margin between a positive and a negative benefit-to-harm balance will be narrow. In such a scenario it will be crucial to optimize the definition of the target population for screening as a high-risk group for lung cancer, the quality of screening in terms of high sensitivity and specificity as well as high quality treatment and an effective ongoing control of program quality. Not all healthcare systems are suitable to fulfill these prerequisites.
美国国家肺癌筛查试验(NLST)首次证实,使用低剂量多层螺旋计算机断层扫描(MSCT)可降低肺癌死亡率。欧洲一些规模较小的试验的初步评估未能证实有这样的降低效果。预计在未来1至2年内会得出规模更大的荷兰-比利时NELSON试验及其他五项欧洲试验的最终评估结果。所有这些研究中已完成轮次的筛查结果表明,利弊平衡的正向与负向之间的差距将很窄。在这种情况下,至关重要的是优化将目标人群定义为肺癌高危组的筛查标准,提高筛查的敏感性和特异性以及治疗质量,并持续有效地控制项目质量。并非所有医疗保健系统都适合满足这些先决条件。