Suppr超能文献

颈动脉僵硬度与 2 型糖尿病患者和非糖尿病患者认知功能障碍有关。马斯特里赫特研究。

Carotid stiffness is associated with impairment of cognitive performance in individuals with and without type 2 diabetes. The Maastricht Study.

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre +, Maastricht, The Netherlands; CARIM School for Cardiovascular Diseases, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands; Department of Neurology, Brain Centre Rudolf Magnus, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Department of Internal Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre +, Maastricht, The Netherlands; CARIM School for Cardiovascular Diseases, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Atherosclerosis. 2016 Oct;253:186-193. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2016.07.912. Epub 2016 Jul 22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

There is increasing evidence linking arterial (mainly aortic) stiffness and type 2 diabetes, a risk factor for arterial stiffness, to cognitive impairment and dementia. However, data on carotid stiffness, which may be especially relevant for cognitive performance, are scarce, and few studies have addressed the interplay between arterial stiffness, type 2 diabetes, and cognitive performance.

METHODS

We studied individuals with (n = 197) and without (n = 528) type 2 diabetes, who completed a neuropsychological test battery and underwent applanation tonometry and vascular ultrasound to evaluate aortic (i.e. carotid-to-femoral pulse wave velocity) and carotid stiffness (i.e. distensibility, compliance and Young's elastic modulus). Linear regression analyses were performed and adjusted for demographics, vascular risk factors, and depression.

RESULTS

Overall, our results showed that carotid, but not aortic, stiffness was associated with worse cognitive performance, primarily in the domains of processing speed (standardized regression coefficient for distensibility -0.083, p = 0.040; compliance -0.077, p = 0.032) and executive function and attention (distensibility -0.133, p = 0.001; compliance -0.090, p = 0.015; Young's elastic modulus -0.081, p = 0.027). These associations did not differ by diabetes status. The differences in cognitive performance between individuals with and without type 2 diabetes (mean difference in domain scores relative to those without diabetes for free recall memory -0.23, processing speed -0.19, executive function and attention -0.23; all p ≤ 0.009 and adjusted for demographics, traditional vascular risk factors, and depression) were not substantially altered after additional adjustment for carotid stiffness.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings suggest that carotid stiffness is associated with cognitive performance in both individuals with and without diabetes, but does not mediate the relationship between type 2 diabetes and cognitive dysfunction.

摘要

背景与目的

越来越多的证据表明,动脉(主要是主动脉)僵硬与 2 型糖尿病(动脉僵硬的一个危险因素)与认知障碍和痴呆有关。然而,关于颈动脉僵硬的数据(颈动脉僵硬可能与认知表现尤其相关)却很少,而且很少有研究探讨动脉僵硬、2 型糖尿病和认知表现之间的相互作用。

方法

我们研究了患有(n=197)和不患有(n=528)2 型糖尿病的个体,他们完成了神经心理学测试组合,并接受了平板张力测量法和血管超声检查,以评估主动脉(即颈动脉-股动脉脉搏波速度)和颈动脉僵硬(即顺应性、弹性和杨氏弹性模量)。进行了线性回归分析,并根据人口统计学、血管危险因素和抑郁情况进行了调整。

结果

总的来说,我们的结果表明,颈动脉僵硬与认知表现较差有关,而主动脉僵硬则不然,主要表现在处理速度(顺应性的标准化回归系数-0.083,p=0.040;顺应性-0.077,p=0.032)和执行功能和注意力(顺应性-0.133,p=0.001;顺应性-0.090,p=0.015;杨氏弹性模量-0.081,p=0.027)领域。这些关联在糖尿病状态之间没有差异。有和没有 2 型糖尿病的个体之间的认知表现差异(相对于没有糖尿病的个体,自由回忆记忆的领域得分差异-0.23,处理速度-0.19,执行功能和注意力-0.23;所有 p≤0.009,并且根据人口统计学、传统血管危险因素和抑郁情况进行了调整)在进一步调整颈动脉僵硬后并未发生实质性改变。

结论

我们的发现表明,颈动脉僵硬与患有和不患有糖尿病的个体的认知表现有关,但不能介导 2 型糖尿病与认知功能障碍之间的关系。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验