Huijing P A, van Lookeren Campagne A A, Koper J F
Faculteit Bewegingswetenschappen, Vrije Universiteit, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Acta Anat (Basel). 1989;135(1):46-52. doi: 10.1159/000146721.
Rat gastrocnemius medialis (GM) and semimembranosus (SM) muscles have a very different morphology. GM is a very pennate muscle, combining relatively short muscle fibre length with sizable fibre angles and long muscle and aponeurosis lengths. SM is a more parallel-fibred muscle, combining a relatively long fibre length with a small fibre angle and short aponeurosis length. The mechanisms of fibre shortening as well as angle increase are operational in GM as well as SM. However, as a consequence of isometric contraction, changes of fibre length and angle are greater for GM than for SM at any relative muscle length. These differences are particularly notable at short muscle lengths: at 80% of optimum muscle length, fibre length changes of approximately 30% are coupled to fibre angle changes of 15 degrees in GM, while for SM these changes are 4% and 0.6 degrees, respectively. A considerable difference was found for normalized active slack muscle length (GM approximately 80 and SM approximately 45%). This is explained by differences of degree of pennation as well as factors related to differences found for estimated fibre length-force characteristics. Estimated normalized active fibre slack length was considerably smaller for SM than for GM (approximately 40 and 60%, respectively). The most likely explanation of these findings are differences of distribution of optimum fibre lengths, possibly in combination with differences of myofilament lengths and/or fibre length distributions.
大鼠的腓肠肌内侧头(GM)和半膜肌(SM)具有非常不同的形态。GM是一块非常羽状的肌肉,其肌纤维长度相对较短,纤维角度较大,肌肉和腱膜长度较长。SM是一块肌纤维更平行的肌肉,其纤维长度相对较长,纤维角度较小,腱膜长度较短。纤维缩短以及角度增加的机制在GM和SM中都起作用。然而,作为等长收缩的结果,在任何相对肌肉长度下,GM的纤维长度和角度变化都比SM大。这些差异在短肌肉长度时尤为明显:在最佳肌肉长度的80%时,GM中纤维长度变化约30%与纤维角度变化15度相关联,而对于SM,这些变化分别为4%和0.6度。在归一化的主动松弛肌肉长度方面发现了相当大的差异(GM约为80%,SM约为45%)。这可以通过羽状程度的差异以及与估计的纤维长度 - 力特性中发现的差异相关的因素来解释。估计的归一化主动纤维松弛长度SM比GM小得多(分别约为40%和60%)。这些发现最可能的解释是最佳纤维长度分布的差异,可能与肌丝长度和/或纤维长度分布的差异相结合。