Guo Qunfeng, Wang Liang, Zhang Bangke, Jiang Jiayao, Guo Xiang, Lu Xuhua, Ni Bin
Department of Orthopedics, Changzheng Hospital, The Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
Department of Orthopedics, Changzheng Hospital, The Second Military Medical University, Shanghai, China.
World Neurosurg. 2016 Nov;95:134-142. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2016.07.099. Epub 2016 Aug 6.
To compare the results of anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) combined with anterior cervical foraminotomy (ACF) and standalone ACDF for the treatment of cervical spondylotic radiculopathy (CSR).
The data of 24 consecutive patients who underwent ACDF combined with ACF for significant bony foraminal stenosis were reviewed. The clinical outcomes, including visual analog scale (VAS) scores for neck pain and arm pain and Neck Disability Index, were evaluated by questionnaires. Radiologic outcomes as manifested by C2-7 angle and surgical segmental angle were recorded. The outcomes were compared with outcomes of standalone ACDF for CSR secondary to posterolateral spurs.
At the final follow-up evaluation, all patients obtained bone fusion. No patient developed adjacent segment disease. Operative time was longer and blood loss was more in the ACDF combined with ACF group than in the ACDF group (all P < 0.05). However, in both groups, the neck VAS score, arm VAS score, and Neck Disability Index were significantly reduced postoperatively (all P < 0.05). The segmental curve and C2-7 lordosis were significantly improved postoperatively (all P < 0.05). There was no significant difference between the 2 groups in clinical and radiologic outcomes (P > 0.05).
For CSR with foraminal stenosis secondary to significant bony pathology that cannot be managed with standalone ACDF, ACDF combined with ACF is an effective and safe treatment strategy.
比较颈椎前路椎间盘切除融合术(ACDF)联合颈椎前路椎间孔切开术(ACF)与单纯ACDF治疗神经根型颈椎病(CSR)的效果。
回顾性分析24例因严重骨性椎间孔狭窄而行ACDF联合ACF手术患者的资料。通过问卷调查评估临床疗效,包括颈部疼痛和手臂疼痛的视觉模拟量表(VAS)评分以及颈部功能障碍指数。记录C2-7角和手术节段角度所显示的影像学结果。将这些结果与因后外侧骨赘导致的CSR行单纯ACDF的结果进行比较。
在末次随访评估时,所有患者均获得了骨融合。无患者发生相邻节段疾病。ACDF联合ACF组的手术时间比ACDF组长,失血量也更多(均P<0.05)。然而,两组患者术后颈部VAS评分、手臂VAS评分和颈部功能障碍指数均显著降低(均P<0.05)。术后节段曲线和C2-7前凸均显著改善(均P<0.05)。两组在临床和影像学结果方面无显著差异(P>0.05)。
对于因严重骨病变继发椎间孔狭窄且无法用单纯ACDF治疗的CSR,ACDF联合ACF是一种有效且安全的治疗策略。