• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估夫妻冲突互动中的情境特定归因。

Assessing Context-Specific Attributions During Couples' Conflict Interactions.

机构信息

1 Baylor University, Waco, TX, USA.

出版信息

Assessment. 2018 Sep;25(6):801-812. doi: 10.1177/1073191116662909. Epub 2016 Aug 9.

DOI:10.1177/1073191116662909
PMID:27507789
Abstract

Two studies were conducted to develop and validate a six-item scale for measuring context-specific attributions regarding the extent to which people either blame or exonerate partners during couples' conflicts. Context-specific attributions pertain to appraisals made during a single episode of relationship conflict, and the scale was expected to be distinct from existing attribution scales measuring people's schemas regarding the types of attributions they typically make. Study 1 included 2,452 people in marriage or cohabitating relationships; Study 2 included 172 people in dating relationships, and participants in both studies completed Internet questionnaires. Item response theory was used to create an attribution scale using the fewest number of items to discriminate reliably across the full range of attribution levels. The resulting scale produced an expected pattern of convergent and divergent correlations with other context-specific measures, including two types of underlying concerns and three types of emotion. The context-specific attribution scale explained variance in these criterion variables that could not be explained by other existing scales that assess attributions at the schematic level.

摘要

两项研究旨在开发和验证一个六分量表,用于衡量在伴侣冲突中,人们对伴侣的责备或宽恕程度的情境归因。情境归因是指在单一的关系冲突事件中做出的评价,并且该量表预计与现有的归因量表不同,后者衡量的是人们对其通常做出的归因类型的模式。研究 1 包括 2452 名处于婚姻或同居关系中的人;研究 2 包括 172 名处于约会关系中的人,两项研究的参与者都完成了在线问卷。项目反应理论被用来创建一个归因量表,使用最少的项目来可靠地区分整个归因水平范围。所得量表与其他情境特定的测量方法产生了预期的聚合和发散相关性,包括两种潜在的关注点和三种情绪类型。情境归因量表解释了这些标准变量的方差,而这些方差无法用其他评估模式水平归因的现有量表来解释。

相似文献

1
Assessing Context-Specific Attributions During Couples' Conflict Interactions.评估夫妻冲突互动中的情境特定归因。
Assessment. 2018 Sep;25(6):801-812. doi: 10.1177/1073191116662909. Epub 2016 Aug 9.
2
The validity of retrospectively reported conflict interactions in couples.夫妻关系中回顾性报告的冲突互动的有效性。
J Fam Psychol. 2015 Apr;29(2):253-62. doi: 10.1037/fam0000057. Epub 2015 Feb 16.
3
Attributions and anger in early marriage: wives are event-dependent and husbands are schematic.初婚中的归因与愤怒:妻子依赖具体事件,而丈夫则基于图式。
J Fam Psychol. 2005 Jun;19(2):180-8. doi: 10.1037/0893-3200.19.2.180.
4
Perceptions of partners' attributions for depression in relation to perceptions of support and conflict in romantic relationships.伴侣对抑郁症的归因认知与浪漫关系中支持和冲突认知的相关性
J Marital Fam Ther. 2014 Oct;40(4):498-508. doi: 10.1111/jmft.12055. Epub 2013 Dec 14.
5
Measuring offence-specific forgiveness in marriage: the Marital Offence-Specific Forgiveness Scale (MOFS).测量婚姻中针对特定冒犯行为的宽恕:婚姻特定冒犯行为宽恕量表(MOFS)。
Psychol Assess. 2009 Jun;21(2):194-209. doi: 10.1037/a0016068.
6
An interpersonal perspective on depression: the role of marital adjustment, conflict communication, attributions, and attachment within a clinical sample.抑郁症的人际视角:婚姻调适、冲突沟通、归因及依恋在临床样本中的作用
Fam Process. 2007 Dec;46(4):499-514. doi: 10.1111/j.1545-5300.2007.00228.x.
7
Development of the Couples' Sleep Conflict Scale: A new tool to assess conflict around sleep in romantic relationships.夫妻睡眠冲突量表的编制:评估浪漫关系中睡眠冲突的新工具。
Sleep Health. 2024 Jun;10(3):308-315. doi: 10.1016/j.sleh.2024.01.009. Epub 2024 Apr 10.
8
Early Effects of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Relationship Satisfaction and Attributions.新冠大流行对婚姻满意度和归因的早期影响。
Psychol Sci. 2020 Dec;31(12):1479-1487. doi: 10.1177/0956797620972688. Epub 2020 Nov 5.
9
Couples' attributions about behaviours modulated by hearing impairment: links with relationship satisfaction.夫妻对由听力障碍所调节行为的归因:与关系满意度的关联。
Int J Audiol. 2005 Apr;44(4):197-205. doi: 10.1080/14992020500057699.
10
Two types of disengagement during couples' conflicts: withdrawal and passive immobility.
Psychol Assess. 2015 Mar;27(1):203-14. doi: 10.1037/pas0000045. Epub 2014 Nov 17.

引用本文的文献

1
Relational needs frustration: an observational study on the role of negative (dis)engaging emotions.关系需求受挫:关于消极(脱离)参与情绪作用的一项观察性研究
Front Psychol. 2023 Nov 23;14:1232125. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1232125. eCollection 2023.
2
The Trust Game for Couples (TGC): A new standardized paradigm to assess trust in romantic relationships.夫妻信任游戏(TGC):一种新的评估浪漫关系中信任的标准化范式。
PLoS One. 2020 Mar 26;15(3):e0230776. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0230776. eCollection 2020.