Kuijer Anne, Schreuder Kay, Elias Sjoerd G, Smorenburg Carolien H, Rutgers Emiel J T, Siesling Sabine, van Dalen Thijs
Department of Surgery, Diakonessenhuis Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Public Health Genomics. 2016;19(5):276-81. doi: 10.1159/000448278. Epub 2016 Aug 11.
Breast cancer guidelines suggest the use of gene expression profiles (GEPs) in estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer patients in whom controversy exists regarding adjuvant chemotherapy benefit based on traditional prognostic factors alone. We evaluated the current use of GEPs in these patients in the Netherlands.
Primary breast cancer patients treated between January 1, 2011 and December 31, 2014 and eligible for GEP use according to the Dutch national breast cancer guideline were identified in the Netherlands Cancer Registry: ER+ patients <70 years with grade 1 tumors >2 cm or grade 2 tumors 1-2 cm without overt lymph node metastases (pN0-Nmi). Mixed-effect logistic regression analysis was performed to associate characteristics of patients, tumors and hospitals with GEP use.
GEPs were increasingly deployed: 12% of eligible patients received a GEP in 2011 versus 46% in 2014. Lobular versus ductal morphology (OR 0.58, 95% CI 0.47-0.72), pN1mi status (versus pN0, OR 0.52, 95% CI 0.40-0.68), and tumor size (>3 cm vs. >2 cm, OR 0.33, 95% CI 0.14-0.88) were inversely associated with GEP use. High socioeconomic status (SES) (OR 1.32, 95% CI 1.06-1.64) and younger age (OR 0.96/year increasing age, 95% CI 0.95-0.96) were positively associated with GEP use. GEP use per hospital did vary, but no predefined institutional factors remained independently associated with GEP use.
GEP use increased over time and was influenced by patient- and tumor-associated factors as well as by SES.
乳腺癌指南建议,对于雌激素受体阳性(ER+)的乳腺癌患者,若仅基于传统预后因素判断辅助化疗的获益存在争议,则可使用基因表达谱(GEP)。我们评估了荷兰这些患者中GEP的当前使用情况。
在荷兰癌症登记处识别出2011年1月1日至2014年12月31日期间接受治疗且符合荷兰国家乳腺癌指南中GEP使用标准的原发性乳腺癌患者:年龄小于70岁的ER+患者,肿瘤为1级且大于2厘米,或2级且1 - 2厘米且无明显淋巴结转移(pN0 - Nmi)。进行混合效应逻辑回归分析,以将患者、肿瘤和医院的特征与GEP使用情况相关联。
GEP的使用越来越多:2011年12%的符合条件患者接受了GEP检测,而2014年这一比例为46%。小叶形态与导管形态(比值比[OR] 0.58,95%置信区间[CI] 0.47 - 0.72)、pN1mi状态(相对于pN0,OR 0.52,95% CI 0.40 - 0.68)以及肿瘤大小(>3厘米与>2厘米,OR 0.33,95% CI 0.14 - 0.88)与GEP使用呈负相关。高社会经济地位(SES)(OR 1.32,95% CI 1.06 - 1.64)和较年轻的年龄(年龄每增加一岁OR 0.96,95% CI 0.95 - 0.96)与GEP使用呈正相关。每家医院的GEP使用情况确实存在差异,但没有预定义的机构因素与GEP使用独立相关。
随着时间的推移,GEP的使用有所增加,并且受到患者和肿瘤相关因素以及社会经济地位的影响。