Suppr超能文献

21 基因复发评分与淋巴结阴性、雌激素受体阳性乳腺癌的局部区域复发。

21-Gene recurrence score and locoregional recurrence in lymph node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer.

机构信息

Department of Pathology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 1275 York Avenue, New York, NY, 10065, USA.

Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, 485 Lexington Avenue, New York, NY, 10017, USA.

出版信息

Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017 Nov;166(1):69-76. doi: 10.1007/s10549-017-4381-7. Epub 2017 Jul 12.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: The 21-gene recurrence score (RS) assay evaluates the likelihood of distant recurrence and benefit of chemotherapy in lymph node-negative, estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, HER2-negative breast cancer patients. The RS categories are associated with the risk of locoregional recurrence (LRR) in some, but not all studies.

METHODS

We reviewed the institutional database to identify consecutive female patients with node-negative, ER+/HER2- breast carcinoma tested for the 21-gene RS assay and treated at our center from 2008 to 2013. We collected data on clinicopathologic features, treatment, and outcome. Statistical analysis was performed using SAS version 9.4 or R version 3.3.2.

RESULTS

Of 2326 patients, 60% (1394) were in the low RS group, 33.4% (777) in the intermediate RS group, and 6.6% (155) in the high RS group. Median follow-up was 53 months. A total of 44 LRRs were observed, with a cumulative incidence of 0.17% at 12 months and 1.6% at 48 months. The cumulative incidence of LRR at 48 months was 0.84%, 2.72% and 2.80% for low, intermediate, and high RS groups, respectively (p < 0.01). Univariate analysis showed that the risk of LRR was associated with the RS categories (p < 0.01), T stage (p < 0.01) and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) (p = 0.009). There was no difference in LRR rates by initial local treatment (total mastectomy vs. breast-conserving surgery plus radiation therapy). The RS remained significantly associated with LRR after adjusting for LVI and T stage. Compared to patients with low RS, the risk of LRR was increased more than 4-fold (hazard ratio: 4.61, 95% CI 1.90-11.19, p < 0.01), and 3-fold (hazard ratio: 2.81, 95% CI 1.41-5.56, p < 0.01) for high and intermediate risk categories, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study confirms that RS is significantly associated with the risk of LRR in node-negative, ER+/HER2- breast cancer patients. Our findings suggest that in addition to its value for prognostic stage grouping and decision-making regarding adjuvant systemic therapy, the role of the RS in identifying patients not requiring radiotherapy should be studied.

摘要

背景/目的:21 基因复发评分(RS)检测可评估淋巴结阴性、雌激素受体(ER)阳性、HER2 阴性乳腺癌患者远处复发的可能性和化疗获益。RS 类别与一些,但不是所有研究中的局部区域复发(LRR)风险相关。

方法

我们回顾了机构数据库,以确定 2008 年至 2013 年在我们中心接受检测 21 基因 RS 检测且淋巴结阴性、ER+/HER2-乳腺癌的连续女性患者。我们收集了临床病理特征、治疗和结局的数据。使用 SAS 版本 9.4 或 R 版本 3.3.2 进行统计分析。

结果

在 2326 名患者中,60%(1394 名)处于低 RS 组,33.4%(777 名)处于中 RS 组,6.6%(155 名)处于高 RS 组。中位随访时间为 53 个月。共观察到 44 例 LRR,12 个月累积发生率为 0.17%,48 个月累积发生率为 1.6%。低、中、高 RS 组 48 个月 LRR 的累积发生率分别为 0.84%、2.72%和 2.80%(p<0.01)。单因素分析显示,LRR 风险与 RS 类别(p<0.01)、T 分期(p<0.01)和脉管侵犯(LVI)(p=0.009)相关。初始局部治疗(全乳房切除术与保乳手术加放疗)之间的 LRR 发生率无差异。调整 LVI 和 T 分期后,RS 与 LRR 仍显著相关。与低 RS 患者相比,高风险(危险比:4.61,95%置信区间 1.90-11.19,p<0.01)和中风险(危险比:2.81,95%置信区间 1.41-5.56,p<0.01)患者的 LRR 风险增加了 4 倍以上。

结论

本研究证实,RS 与淋巴结阴性、ER+/HER2-乳腺癌患者的 LRR 风险显著相关。我们的研究结果表明,除了其在预后分期分组和辅助全身治疗决策方面的价值外,还应研究 RS 在确定不需要放疗的患者方面的作用。

相似文献

1
21-Gene recurrence score and locoregional recurrence in lymph node-negative, estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer.
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017 Nov;166(1):69-76. doi: 10.1007/s10549-017-4381-7. Epub 2017 Jul 12.
10
The 21-gene recurrence score in special histologic subtypes of breast cancer with favorable prognosis.
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2017 Aug;165(1):65-76. doi: 10.1007/s10549-017-4326-1. Epub 2017 Jun 3.

引用本文的文献

4
The oncological safety of autologous fat grafting: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
BMC Cancer. 2022 Apr 11;22(1):391. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-09485-5.
6
Personalization in Modern Radiation Oncology: Methods, Results and Pitfalls. Personalized Interventions and Breast Cancer.
Front Oncol. 2021 Mar 18;11:616042. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.616042. eCollection 2021.
10
Commercially Available Gene Expression Assays as Predictive Tools for Adjuvant Radiotherapy? A Critical Review.
Breast Care (Basel). 2020 Apr;15(2):118-126. doi: 10.1159/000505656. Epub 2020 Jan 24.

本文引用的文献

2
Prospective Evaluation of the 21-Gene Recurrence Score Assay for Breast Cancer Decision-Making in Ontario.
J Clin Oncol. 2016 Apr 1;34(10):1065-71. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.62.8503. Epub 2015 Nov 23.
3
Prospective Validation of a 21-Gene Expression Assay in Breast Cancer.
N Engl J Med. 2015 Nov 19;373(21):2005-14. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1510764. Epub 2015 Sep 27.
5
Multigene prognostic tests in breast cancer: past, present, future.
Breast Cancer Res. 2015 Jan 27;17(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s13058-015-0514-2.
7
The 21-gene recurrence score and locoregional recurrence in breast cancer patients.
Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Apr;22(4):1088-94. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-4252-y. Epub 2014 Dec 4.
8
The impact of the Oncotype Dx breast cancer assay in clinical practice: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2013 Aug;141(1):13-22. doi: 10.1007/s10549-013-2666-z. Epub 2013 Aug 24.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验