Suppr超能文献

英夫利昔单抗和阿达木单抗药物监测的系统评价:水平、临床结果及检测方法

A Systematic Review on Infliximab and Adalimumab Drug Monitoring: Levels, Clinical Outcomes and Assays.

作者信息

Silva-Ferreira Filipa, Afonso Joana, Pinto-Lopes Pedro, Magro Fernando

机构信息

*Department of Pharmacology and Therapeutics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal; †MedInUP, Center for Drug Discovery and Innovative Medicines, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal;and ‡Departments of Internal Medicine, and §Gastroenterology, Faculty of Medicine, Centro Hospitalar S. João, Porto, Portugal.

出版信息

Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2016 Sep;22(9):2289-301. doi: 10.1097/MIB.0000000000000855.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Immunogenicity to therapeutic proteins has been linked to loss of response by a large percentage of patients taking anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha agents. Drug monitoring can be extremely useful, allowing physicians to adjust the therapeutic scheme individually. This article aims to systematically review the published data with respect to cutoff levels of infliximab (IFX) and adalimumab (ADA) and relate them to the methodology adopted for quantification of IFX and ADA levels and clinical outcomes.

METHODS

The PubMed database was searched to identify studies focusing on the association between IFX or ADA cutoff levels and clinical outcomes in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

RESULTS

Of the 1654 articles initially selected by queries, 20 were included. A receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was performed to identify cutoff levels of IFX or ADA that correlated with a clinical outcome, but only 6 studies performed the same analysis for antidrug antibody levels. Cutoff levels were different between studies. The methodology chosen for level quantifications, clinical outcomes, and sample size and characteristics were also different. Nevertheless, measurement of drug levels should be performed during maintenance, and with loss of response, with persistent high levels of C-reactive protein, and when mucosal lesions are still present. In these scenarios, drug and antidrug levels were correlated with clinical outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Concerning drug levels monitoring any methodology is adequate. With respect to antidrug antibody levels, it will be necessary to define a gold standard method or to establish different cutoff levels for different methodologies.

摘要

背景

治疗性蛋白质的免疫原性与很大一部分使用抗肿瘤坏死因子-α药物的患者反应丧失有关。药物监测可能非常有用,可使医生能够个性化调整治疗方案。本文旨在系统回顾已发表的关于英夫利昔单抗(IFX)和阿达木单抗(ADA)临界值水平的数据,并将其与用于量化IFX和ADA水平的方法以及临床结果相关联。

方法

检索PubMed数据库,以识别关注IFX或ADA临界值水平与炎症性肠病患者临床结果之间关联的研究。

结果

通过查询最初筛选出的1654篇文章中,纳入了20篇。进行了受试者工作特征曲线分析,以确定与临床结果相关的IFX或ADA临界值水平,但只有6项研究对抗药物抗体水平进行了相同分析。各研究之间的临界值水平不同。用于水平定量、临床结果以及样本量和特征的方法也不同。然而,应在维持治疗期间、出现反应丧失、C反应蛋白持续高水平以及仍存在黏膜病变时进行药物水平测量。在这些情况下,药物和抗药物水平与临床结果相关。

结论

关于药物水平监测,任何方法都足够。关于抗药物抗体水平,有必要定义一种金标准方法或为不同方法建立不同的临界值水平。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验