Institute of Environmental Assessment and Water Research, IDAEA-CSIC, C/ Jordi Girona 18-26, 08034 Barcelona, Spain.
Institute of Environmental Assessment and Water Research, IDAEA-CSIC, C/ Jordi Girona 18-26, 08034 Barcelona, Spain.
Sci Total Environ. 2016 Dec 1;572:379-389. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2016.07.193. Epub 2016 Aug 8.
The 2000-2015 occurrences of the highest ozone (O) pollution episodes in Spain were evaluated to investigate their origin. To this end, data series available for urban and regional background (UB and RB), traffic (TR) and industrial (IN) sites were analysed separately and intercompared. Results evidenced that during these 16years mean O levels in the RB sites did not change significantly, and remained constantly high. However, there is a clear increase at the TR and UB sites. Although sensitivity analysis is needed to interpret the cause of this increasing trend, this might be caused probably by the lower O titration intensity due to the preferential abatement of NO vs NO, as supported from the neutral trend of O (NO+O) at these sites. We found that the exceedances of the hourly information threshold for O (>180μg/m) are recorded mostly at UB and IN sites located in seven areas of Spain (specific hotspots or at the tail end of large urban plumes), and that these increased during summer heatwaves (i.e. 2003 and 2015). Although the external contribution of regional-to-subcontinental transported O might be relevant during the highest O episodes in the Western Mediterranean, our results evidenced that in the above specific areas, regional-local O production decisively contributes to the exceedances of the information threshold. Also that the human protection threshold and the AOT40 are more frequently exceeded in the Central, Southern and Mediterranean sides of the Iberian Peninsula. The design of effective episode abatement measures is quite complex in those conditions, due to both the nonlinearity of the chemical processes of O formation and destruction, and to the interplay with the complex meteorological setting, causing frequent recirculation and in situ aging of air masses. However, the combination of meteorological forecasting of the main recirculation processes and sensitivity analysis of NO/VOC emission abatement measures might be powerful tools to evaluate the effectiveness of potential O mitigation strategies. Finally we would like to highlight that the current UB, RB, IN and TR classification (somewhat subjective) is not adequate to interpret the origin of O exceedances in complex areas of Southern Europe. Thus, a UB station recording exceedances, and located in a small city in the tail end of an urban plume of a large city, receives not only the contribution from its own UB, but mainly from the specific high O RB caused by the urban plume transport.
评估了 2000-2015 年期间西班牙臭氧 (O) 污染最高事件的发生情况,以研究其来源。为此,分别分析和比较了城市和区域背景 (UB 和 RB)、交通 (TR) 和工业 (IN) 站点的可用数据系列。结果表明,在这 16 年中,RB 站点的平均 O 水平没有显著变化,并且一直保持高位。然而,TR 和 UB 站点的 O 水平明显增加。尽管需要进行敏感性分析来解释这种增加趋势的原因,但这可能是由于 O 滴定强度降低所致,这是由于 NO 与 NO 的优先减排所致,这从这些站点 O (NO+O) 的中性趋势中得到支持。我们发现,O (>180μg/m) 小时信息阈值的超标主要发生在西班牙七个地区的 UB 和 IN 站点(特定热点地区或大型城市羽流的末端),并且这些超标在夏季热浪期间有所增加(即 2003 年和 2015 年)。尽管区域到次大陆输送的 O 的外部贡献在西地中海的最高 O 事件期间可能很重要,但我们的结果表明,在上述特定地区,区域-本地 O 的产生对信息阈值的超标有决定性的贡献。此外,在伊比利亚半岛的中部、南部和地中海地区,人类保护阈值和 AOT40 更频繁地超标。在这些条件下,由于 O 形成和破坏的化学过程的非线性,以及与复杂的气象环境相互作用,导致空气团频繁再循环和原地老化,因此设计有效的事件减排措施非常复杂。然而,结合主要再循环过程的气象预报和对 NO/VOC 排放减排措施的敏感性分析,可能是评估潜在 O 缓解策略有效性的有力工具。最后,我们想强调的是,当前的 UB、RB、IN 和 TR 分类(有些主观)不足以解释复杂的南欧地区 O 超标现象的来源。因此,记录超标的 UB 站位于大城市城市羽流末端的小城市,不仅接收来自自身 UB 的贡献,还主要接收由城市羽流输送引起的特定高 O RB 的贡献。