Suppr超能文献

经胫骨与前内侧入路技术(TRANSIG)后前交叉韧带移植物的MRI信号强度:一项随机对照临床试验的设计

MRI signal intensity of anterior cruciate ligament graft after transtibial versus anteromedial portal technique (TRANSIG): design of a randomized controlled clinical trial.

作者信息

Ruiter Simeon J S, Brouwer Reinoud W, Meys Tim W G M, Slump Cornelis H, van Raay Jos J A M

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Martini Hospital Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.

Department of Technical Medicine, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016 Aug 10;17(1):334. doi: 10.1186/s12891-016-1183-8.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

There are two primary surgical techniques to reconstruct the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL), transtibial (TT) technique and anteromedial portal (AMP) technique. Currently, there is no consensus which surgical technique elicits the best clinical and functional outcomes. MRI-derived measures of the signal intensity (SI) of the ACL graft have been described as an independent predictor of graft properties. The purpose of this study is to compare the MRI derived SI measurements of the ACL graft one year after ACL reconstruction, in order to compare the outcomes of both the AMP and TT ACL reconstruction technique.

METHODS/DESIGN: Thirty-six patients will be included in a randomized controlled trial. Patients who are admitted for primary unilateral ACL reconstruction will be included in the study. Exclusion criteria are a history of previous surgery on the ipsilateral knee, re-rupture of the ipsilateral ACL graft, associated ligamentous injuries or meniscal tear of the ipsilateral knee, unhealthy contralateral knee, contra-indications for MRI and a preference for one of the two surgical techniques and/or orthopaedic surgeon. Primary outcome is MRI Signal intensity ratio (SIR) of the ACL graft. Secondary outcome measures are the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Knee Examination Form,the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Scores (KOOS) and the Anterior Cruciate Ligament OsteoArthritis Score (ACLOAS). Differences between MRI SIR assessment with the current MRI protocol (proton density weighted imaging protocol) and the additional T2*-weighted gradient-echo protocol will be assessed.

DISCUSSION

There is no consensus regarding the TT or AMP ACL reconstruction technique. SI measurements with MRI have been used in other clinical studies for evaluation of the ACL graft and maturation after ACL reconstruction compared to clinical and functional outcomes. This randomized controlled trial has been designed to compare the TT technique with the AMP technique with the use of MRI SI of the graft after ACL reconstruction.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Netherlands Trial Registry NTR5410 (registered on August 24, 2015).

摘要

背景

重建前交叉韧带(ACL)主要有两种外科技术,即经胫骨(TT)技术和前内侧入路(AMP)技术。目前,对于哪种外科技术能带来最佳的临床和功能结果尚无共识。MRI得出的ACL移植物信号强度(SI)测量值已被描述为移植物特性的独立预测指标。本研究的目的是比较ACL重建术后一年通过MRI得出的ACL移植物SI测量值,以比较AMP和TT两种ACL重建技术的结果。

方法/设计:36名患者将被纳入一项随机对照试验。纳入研究的患者为因原发性单侧ACL重建而入院者。排除标准包括同侧膝关节既往手术史、同侧ACL移植物再次断裂、同侧膝关节相关韧带损伤或半月板撕裂、对侧膝关节不健康、MRI禁忌证以及对两种外科技术之一和/或骨科医生有偏好。主要结局是ACL移植物的MRI信号强度比(SIR)。次要结局指标包括国际膝关节文献委员会(IKDC)膝关节检查表、膝关节损伤与骨关节炎结局评分(KOOS)以及前交叉韧带骨关节炎评分(ACLOAS)。将评估当前MRI方案(质子密度加权成像方案)与额外的T2 *加权梯度回波方案在MRI SIR评估方面的差异。

讨论

关于TT或AMP ACL重建技术尚无共识。与临床和功能结局相比,MRI的SI测量已在其他临床研究中用于评估ACL移植物及ACL重建后的成熟情况。本随机对照试验旨在通过使用ACL重建后移植物的MRI SI来比较TT技术和AMP技术。

试验注册

荷兰试验注册库NTR5410(于2015年8月24日注册)。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9193/4980785/7553f2cb2363/12891_2016_1183_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验