Air Products and Chemicals, Inc., Allentown, Pennsylvania, USA.
J Am Soc Mass Spectrom. 1998 Apr;9(4):282-91. doi: 10.1016/S1044-0305(97)00291-2.
The results of fast atom bombardment (FAB), time-of-flight secondary ion mass spectrometry (ToF-SIMS), matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization (MALD/I), electrospray ionization (ESI), and field desorption (FD) analyses of ethoxylated oligomers of 2,4,7,9-tetramethyl-5-decyne-4,7-diol (Surfynol(®) 104) were compared.Each of these desorption mass spectrometry (MS) techniques can produce spectra of unfragmented cationized oligomers. From the observed ion series we calculate average molecular weight information. We have compared the results of mass spectrometric analyses of a series of ethoxylated Surfynol surfactants. Our data indicate that FAB, ToF-SIMS, MALDI/I, and ESI produce similar results for the lower molecular weight species, but that as the average molecular weight increases FAB and SIMS produce slightly lower results than MALD/I and FD. This could be due to increased fragmentation. ESI produced a result similar to FAB and SIMS for the highest average molecular weight material. Further experiments compare the mass spectral results with gas chromatographic quantitative data. Although gas chromatography is not expected to accurately analyze the higher mass oligomers, we observe significant differences in intensities of the short-chain oligomers (especially the 0- and 1-mers) when compared to the desorption mass spectrometer results. These differences may reflect poor cationization efficiency for very short oligomer chains in the mass spectrometric analyses.
对 2,4,7,9-四甲基-5-癸炔-4,7-二醇(Surfynol(®) 104)乙氧基化低聚物进行了快原子轰击(FAB)、飞行时间二次离子质谱(ToF-SIMS)、基质辅助激光解吸/电离(MALD/I)、电喷雾电离(ESI)和场解吸(FD)分析的结果进行了比较。这些解吸质谱(MS)技术中的每一种都可以产生未碎片化的阳离子化低聚物的光谱。从观察到的离子系列中,我们计算出平均分子量信息。我们比较了一系列乙氧基化 Surfynol 表面活性剂的质谱分析结果。我们的数据表明,FAB、ToF-SIMS、MALDI/I 和 ESI 对低分子量物质产生相似的结果,但随着平均分子量的增加,FAB 和 SIMS 产生的结果略低于 MALD/I 和 FD。这可能是由于碎片增加。ESI 对最高平均分子量的材料产生的结果与 FAB 和 SIMS 相似。进一步的实验将质谱结果与气相色谱定量数据进行了比较。尽管气相色谱法预计无法准确分析较高分子量的低聚物,但当与解吸质谱结果相比时,我们观察到短链低聚物(特别是 0-和 1-mer)的强度存在显著差异。这些差异可能反映了质谱分析中非常短的低聚物链的阳离子化效率较差。