• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在阿尔茨海默病的临床试验中,老年患者的比例仍然偏低。

Older patients are still under-represented in clinical trials of Alzheimer's disease.

作者信息

Banzi Rita, Camaioni Paolo, Tettamanti Mauro, Bertele' Vittorio, Lucca Ugo

机构信息

Laboratorio Politiche Regolatorie del Farmaco, IRCCS Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri, Via La Masa 19, Milan, 20156, Italy.

Laboratorio di Neuropsichiatria Geriatrica, IRCCS Istituto di Ricerche Farmacologiche Mario Negri, Via La Masa 19, Milan, 20156, Italy.

出版信息

Alzheimers Res Ther. 2016 Aug 12;8:32. doi: 10.1186/s13195-016-0201-2.

DOI:10.1186/s13195-016-0201-2
PMID:27520290
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4982205/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The age gap between participants in trials and patients who could benefit from the drugs studied has been widely documented across different clinical areas. Patients with dementia included in clinical research are systematically younger than those in the general population. We examined the age gap between participants in recent clinical trials testing interventions for Alzheimer's disease and epidemiological data.

METHODS

We systematically searched literature databases (MedLine, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library) and ClinicalTrials.gov from 2000 to July 2015 to retrieve clinical trials testing pharmacologic treatments for Alzheimer's disease, other than cholinesterase inhibitors and memantine. We included ongoing and completed phase II/III randomized clinical trials, irrespective of their publication status. From each study reporting the participants' ages, we extracted size of sample, mean age, and standard deviation, and estimated the proportions of participants in different age classes. The number of patients with Alzheimer's disease by age class in the USA population was used for comparison.

RESULTS

We included 165 clinical trials testing almost 100 different compounds, which enrolled or planned to enroll about 74,300 participants. Seventy-nine of these trials, accounting for about 26,800 participants, reported the age of the participants. The weighted mean age was 73.6 years (standard deviation, 8.2). People younger than 80 years were highly represented in clinical trials (78 %), despite the fact that those aged 80 and older form the majority (72 %) of patients with Alzheimer's disease. Only 8 % of clinical trial participants were 85 years or older.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients enrolled in clinical trials on Alzheimer's disease are far from being representative of actual distribution of the patients in the general population. Clinical research should not be designed and conducted overlooking the fact that the majority of individuals with Alzheimer's disease are likely to be 80 or older.

摘要

背景

在不同临床领域,试验参与者与能从所研究药物中获益的患者之间的年龄差距已有广泛记录。纳入临床研究的痴呆症患者在系统上比一般人群中的患者年轻。我们研究了近期针对阿尔茨海默病进行干预测试的临床试验参与者与流行病学数据之间的年龄差距。

方法

我们系统检索了2000年至2015年7月的文献数据库(MedLine、EMBASE、Cochrane图书馆)和ClinicalTrials.gov,以检索除胆碱酯酶抑制剂和美金刚之外针对阿尔茨海默病进行药物治疗测试的临床试验。我们纳入了正在进行和已完成的II/III期随机临床试验,无论其发表状态如何。从每项报告参与者年龄的研究中,我们提取了样本量、平均年龄和标准差,并估计了不同年龄组参与者的比例。美国人群中按年龄组划分的阿尔茨海默病患者数量用于比较。

结果

我们纳入了165项测试近100种不同化合物的临床试验,这些试验已招募或计划招募约74300名参与者。其中79项试验,涉及约26800名参与者,报告了参与者的年龄。加权平均年龄为73.6岁(标准差8.2)。尽管80岁及以上的人占阿尔茨海默病患者的大多数(72%),但80岁以下的人在临床试验中占比很高(78%)。只有8%的临床试验参与者年龄在85岁及以上。

结论

参与阿尔茨海默病临床试验的患者远不能代表一般人群中患者的实际分布情况。临床研究的设计和开展不应忽视这样一个事实,即大多数阿尔茨海默病患者可能年龄在80岁及以上。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/634c/4982205/9431d1530221/13195_2016_201_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/634c/4982205/eaab1b453f79/13195_2016_201_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/634c/4982205/847554dbb508/13195_2016_201_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/634c/4982205/9431d1530221/13195_2016_201_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/634c/4982205/eaab1b453f79/13195_2016_201_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/634c/4982205/847554dbb508/13195_2016_201_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/634c/4982205/9431d1530221/13195_2016_201_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Older patients are still under-represented in clinical trials of Alzheimer's disease.在阿尔茨海默病的临床试验中,老年患者的比例仍然偏低。
Alzheimers Res Ther. 2016 Aug 12;8:32. doi: 10.1186/s13195-016-0201-2.
2
3
Systematic Review: Representativeness of Participants in RCTs of Acetylcholinesterase Inhibitors.系统评价:乙酰胆碱酯酶抑制剂随机对照试验中参与者的代表性
PLoS One. 2015 May 1;10(5):e0124500. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124500. eCollection 2015.
4
Current Landscape of Late-Phase Clinical Trials for Alzheimer's Disease: Comparing Regional Variation Between Subjects in Japan and North America.阿尔茨海默病晚期临床试验的现状:比较日本和北美国受试者之间的地区差异。
Pharmaceut Med. 2019 Dec;33(6):511-518. doi: 10.1007/s40290-019-00306-y.
5
Time to Treatment Initiation in People With Alzheimer Disease: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.阿尔茨海默病患者开始治疗的时间:随机对照试验的荟萃分析
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2016 Jan;17(1):24-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2015.08.007. Epub 2015 Sep 26.
6
Dementia of Alzheimer's disease and other neurodegenerative disorders--memantine, a new hope.阿尔茨海默病及其他神经退行性疾病所致痴呆——美金刚,新希望。
Pharmacol Res. 2005 Jan;51(1):1-17. doi: 10.1016/j.phrs.2004.05.005.
7
8
Socioeconomic disparities in clinical trials on Alzheimer's disease: a systematic review.阿尔茨海默病临床试验中的社会经济差异:系统评价。
Eur J Neurol. 2018 Apr;25(4):626-e43. doi: 10.1111/ene.13587. Epub 2018 Feb 26.
9
Exclusion of Elderly People from Randomized Clinical Trials of Drugs for Ischemic Heart Disease.老年人群被排除在缺血性心脏病药物随机临床试验之外。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2017 Nov;65(11):2354-2361. doi: 10.1111/jgs.14833. Epub 2017 Mar 17.
10
Metastatic gastroesophageal cancer in older patients - is this patient cohort represented in clinical trials?老年转移性胃食管交界癌患者——临床试验中是否纳入了这一患者群体?
BMC Cancer. 2022 Jan 3;22(1):3. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-09103-w.

引用本文的文献

1
Longitudinal Remote Sleep and Cognitive Research in Older Adults With Mild Cognitive Impairment and Dementia: Prospective Feasibility Cohort Study.轻度认知障碍和痴呆症老年人的纵向远程睡眠与认知研究:前瞻性可行性队列研究
JMIR Aging. 2025 May 28;8:e72824. doi: 10.2196/72824.
2
Maximizing the benefit and managing the risk of anti-amyloid monoclonal antibody therapy for Alzheimer's disease: Strategies and research directions.最大化阿尔茨海默病抗淀粉样蛋白单克隆抗体治疗的益处并管理其风险:策略与研究方向
Neurotherapeutics. 2025 Apr;22(3):e00570. doi: 10.1016/j.neurot.2025.e00570. Epub 2025 Mar 20.
3
Enhancing vaccine clinical trials participation among elderly: challenges and strategies.

本文引用的文献

1
Defeating Alzheimer's disease and other dementias: a priority for European science and society.战胜阿尔茨海默病及其他痴呆症:欧洲科学与社会的当务之急。
Lancet Neurol. 2016 Apr;15(5):455-532. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(16)00062-4.
2
A literature review on the representativeness of randomized controlled trial samples and implications for the external validity of trial results.关于随机对照试验样本代表性及其对试验结果外部有效性影响的文献综述。
Trials. 2015 Nov 3;16:495. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-1023-4.
3
2015 Alzheimer's disease facts and figures.
提高老年人参与疫苗临床试验的程度:挑战与策略。
Trials. 2025 Feb 3;26(1):38. doi: 10.1186/s13063-025-08754-5.
4
Protocol for the systematic review of age and sex in preclinical models of age-correlated diseases.年龄相关性疾病临床前模型中年龄与性别的系统评价方案
F1000Res. 2024 Nov 25;13:858. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.153466.2. eCollection 2024.
5
Characterization of the literature informing health care of transgender and gender-diverse persons: A bibliometric analysis.描述性分析:为跨性别者和性别多样化人群提供的医疗保健相关文献。
PLoS One. 2024 Oct 4;19(10):e0309169. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0309169. eCollection 2024.
6
ω-3 PUFA for Secondary Prevention of White Matter Lesions and Neuronal Integrity Breakdown in Older Adults: A Randomized Clinical Trial.ω-3多不饱和脂肪酸用于老年人白质病变和神经元完整性破坏的二级预防:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Aug 1;7(8):e2426872. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.26872.
7
Pre-clinical Models for Geriatric Pharmacotherapy.老年病药理学的临床前模型。
Drugs Aging. 2024 Aug;41(8):633-640. doi: 10.1007/s40266-024-01129-6. Epub 2024 Jul 9.
8
Analysis of eligibility criteria in Alzheimer's and related dementias clinical trials.阿尔茨海默病和相关痴呆症临床试验的入选标准分析。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 1;14(1):15036. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-65767-x.
9
Trial Participation in Neurodegenerative Diseases: Barriers and Facilitators: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.神经退行性疾病临床试验参与:障碍与促进因素:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Neurology. 2024 Jul 9;103(1):e209503. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000209503. Epub 2024 Jun 3.
10
Generating real-world evidence in Alzheimer's disease: Considerations for establishing a core dataset.在阿尔茨海默病中生成真实世界证据:建立核心数据集的考虑因素。
Alzheimers Dement. 2024 Jun;20(6):4331-4341. doi: 10.1002/alz.13785. Epub 2024 May 6.
2015 年阿尔茨海默病事实和数据。
Alzheimers Dement. 2015 Mar;11(3):332-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2015.02.003.
4
Systematic Review: Representativeness of Participants in RCTs of Acetylcholinesterase Inhibitors.系统评价:乙酰胆碱酯酶抑制剂随机对照试验中参与者的代表性
PLoS One. 2015 May 1;10(5):e0124500. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0124500. eCollection 2015.
5
NILVAD protocol: a European multicentre double-blind placebo-controlled trial of nilvadipine in mild-to-moderate Alzheimer's disease.尼伐地平方案:一项欧洲多中心双盲安慰剂对照试验,评估尼伐地平治疗轻度至中度阿尔茨海默病的疗效。
BMJ Open. 2014 Oct 9;4(10):e006364. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006364.
6
Prevalence of dementia in the oldest old: the Monzino 80-plus population based study.高龄人群中痴呆症的患病率:基于 Monzino80+ 人群的研究。
Alzheimers Dement. 2015 Mar;11(3):258-70.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2014.05.1750. Epub 2014 Aug 20.
7
Clinical trials and late-stage drug development for Alzheimer's disease: an appraisal from 1984 to 2014.从 1984 年到 2014 年对阿尔茨海默病的临床试验和后期药物开发的评价。
J Intern Med. 2014 Mar;275(3):251-83. doi: 10.1111/joim.12191.
8
Alzheimer disease in the United States (2010-2050) estimated using the 2010 census.美国阿尔茨海默病(2010-2050 年)的预估基于 2010 年的人口普查数据。
Neurology. 2013 May 7;80(19):1778-83. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31828726f5. Epub 2013 Feb 6.
9
The global prevalence of dementia: a systematic review and metaanalysis.全球痴呆症患病率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Alzheimers Dement. 2013 Jan;9(1):63-75.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jalz.2012.11.007.
10
The older the better: are elderly study participants more non-representative? A cross-sectional analysis of clinical trial and observational study samples.越老越好:老年研究参与者的代表性越差吗?一项临床试验和观察性研究样本的横断面分析。
BMJ Open. 2012 Dec 14;2(6). doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-000833. Print 2012.