van Leeuwen Justin A M J, Röhrl Stephan M
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Betanien Hospital, Skien, Norway.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017 Mar;25(3):752-758. doi: 10.1007/s00167-016-4268-x. Epub 2016 Aug 12.
To investigate whether the intended preoperative planning corresponded with the postoperative component position after medial UKA using patient-specific positioning guides (PSPGs).
Twenty-five consecutive UKAs performed with the PSPG technique (Signature™) were included. Two independent observers performed postoperative CT measurements. The preoperative angles for the femoral component were defined in the frontal plane as 0°. In the first eight cases, a femoral component with single peg was inserted, and the flexion of the femoral component was set to 5°. In the last 17 cases, a twin-peg component was used and flexion set to 10°. In the axial plane, the femoral component was on average set at 2.5° internal rotation. The preoperative tibial component angles in the frontal and axial plane were defined as 0° and in the sagittal plane as 4° in flexion.
The postoperative femoral component angles were on average 0.8° of valgus (SD 3.2, range 12.2° valgus to 5.1° varus, n.s., CI -2.1 to 0.6), 5.0° of flexion (SD 3.9, range 10.2° flexion to 6.0° extension, p = 0.001, CI -5.3 to -1.5) and 4.0° of internal rotation (SD 1.7, range 1.4° to 6.9° int.rot., p < 0.001, CI -4.7 to -3.4). The tibial component angles were on average 3.0° of varus (SD 1.9, range 1.3° valgus to 6.8° varus, p < 0.001, CI 2.2 to 3.8), 3.2° of flexion (SD 2.4°, 6.7° flex to 1.8° ext, n.s., CI -0.2 to 1.7) and 2.7° of internal rotation (SD 7.0, range 16.6° int.rot. to 10.7° ext.rot., n.s., CI -5.6 to 0.2).
This study showed no agreement between preoperative planning and postoperative component alignment (p < 0.05) for the femoral component angle in sagittal and axial plane and for the tibial component angle in the coronal plane. Although the results did not show significant difference for the tibial component angle in the axial plane, a considerable range of the component angles was found varying from 17° internal to 11° external rotation. This study suggests that the use of PSPGs for UKA does not lead to consistent component position.
IV.
探讨使用患者特异性定位导板(PSPGs)进行内侧单髁置换术(UKA)时,术前规划与术后假体位置是否相符。
纳入连续25例采用PSPG技术(Signature™)进行的UKA手术。两名独立观察者进行术后CT测量。股骨假体的术前角度在额状面定义为0°。在前8例中,植入单栓股骨假体,股骨假体的屈曲角度设定为5°。在最后17例中,使用双栓假体,屈曲角度设定为10°。在矢状面,股骨假体平均内旋2.5°。胫骨假体在额状面和矢状面的术前角度定义为0°,在矢状面的屈曲角度定义为4°。
术后股骨假体角度平均外翻0.8°(标准差3.2,范围为外翻12.2°至内翻5.1°,无统计学意义,可信区间-2.1至-0.6),屈曲5.0°(标准差3.9,范围为屈曲10.2°至伸展6.0°,p = 0.001,可信区间-5.3至-1.5),内旋4.0°(标准差1.7,范围为1.4°至6.9°内旋,p < 0.001,可信区间-4.7至-3.4)。胫骨假体角度平均内翻3.0°(标准差1.9,范围为外翻1.3°至内翻6.8°,p < 0.001,可信区间2.2至3.8),屈曲3.2°(标准差2.4°,范围为屈曲6.7°至伸展1.8°,无统计学意义,可信区间-0.2至1.7),内旋(标准差7.0,范围为内旋16.6°至外旋10.7°,无统计学意义,可信区间-5.6至0.2)。
本研究表明,对于矢状面和轴面的股骨假体角度以及冠状面的胫骨假体角度,术前规划与术后假体对线不一致(p < 0.05)。虽然结果显示胫骨假体在轴面的角度无显著差异,但发现假体角度范围相当大,从内旋17°到外旋11°不等。本研究提示,UKA使用PSPGs并不能导致假体位置的一致性。
IV级。