Ebesutani Chad, Kim Mirihae, Park Hee-Hoon
Duksung Women's University, South Korea.
Duksung Women's University, South Korea.
Asian J Psychiatr. 2016 Aug;22:116-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2016.06.005. Epub 2016 Jun 25.
The present study was the first to examine the applicability of the bifactor structure underlying the Anxiety Sensitivity Index-3 (ASI-3) in an East Asian (South Korean) sample and to determine which factors in the bifactor model were significantly associated with anxiety, depression, and negative affect. Using a sample of 289 South Korean university students, we compared (a) the original 3-factor AS model, (b) a 3-group bifactor AS model, and (c) a 2-group bifactor AS model (with only the physical and social concern group factors present). Results revealed that the 2-group bifactor AS model fit the ASI-3 data the best. Relatedly, although all ASI-3 items loaded on the general AS factor, the Cognitive Concern group factor was not defined in the bifactor model and may therefore need to be omitted in order to accurately model AS when conducting factor analysis and structural equation modeling (SEM) in cross cultural contexts. SEM results also revealed that the general AS factor was the only factor from the 2-group bifactor model that significantly predicted anxiety, depression, and negative affect. Implications and importance of this new bifactor structure of Anxiety Sensitivity in East Asian samples are discussed.
本研究首次检验了焦虑敏感性指数-3(ASI-3)潜在双因素结构在东亚(韩国)样本中的适用性,并确定双因素模型中的哪些因素与焦虑、抑郁和消极情绪显著相关。我们以289名韩国大学生为样本,比较了:(a)原始的三因素焦虑敏感性模型;(b)一个三组双因素焦虑敏感性模型;以及(c)一个两组双因素焦虑敏感性模型(仅包含身体和社交担忧组因素)。结果显示,两组双因素焦虑敏感性模型对ASI-3数据的拟合度最佳。相关地,虽然ASI-3的所有项目都在一般焦虑敏感性因素上有载荷,但双因素模型中未定义认知担忧组因素,因此在跨文化背景下进行因素分析和结构方程模型(SEM)时,为了准确地对焦虑敏感性进行建模,可能需要省略该因素。结构方程模型结果还显示,一般焦虑敏感性因素是两组双因素模型中唯一能显著预测焦虑、抑郁和消极情绪的因素。本文讨论了这种焦虑敏感性新双因素结构在东亚样本中的意义和重要性。