• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

焦虑敏感性指数3的探索性结构方程模型分析

Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling Analysis of the Anxiety Sensitivity Index 3.

作者信息

Lim Young-Jin

机构信息

Gachon University, Seongnam, Korea.

出版信息

Alpha Psychiatry. 2024 Jun 1;25(3):337-343. doi: 10.5152/alphapsychiatry.2024.241520. eCollection 2024 Jun.

DOI:10.5152/alphapsychiatry.2024.241520
PMID:39148592
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11322669/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Anxiety sensitivity is associated with the onset and progression of various emotional disorders. The Anxiety Sensitivity Index 3 (ASI-3) is a self-report scale for anxiety sensitivity. This study aims to resolve the ongoing controversy about the factorial structure of the ASI-3 using exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM), a newly advanced technique.

METHODS

Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA), ESEM, bifactor-CFA, and bifactor-ESEM were used to investigate the factorial structure of the ASI-3. Three hundred Korean college students (female = 195, age: 21.74 ± 2.34) filled out the ASI-3 and the Distress Intolerance Index.

RESULTS

The bifactor-ESEM model exhibited a model fit superior to the 4 alternative models. The general factor showed higher loadings and reliability and explained common variance than the 3 specific factors in the bifactor-ESEM model. Most items reflected the global factor, but 6 items (Items 2, 3, 5, 7, 10, and 17) from the specific factors had insufficient loadings. Moreover, the global factor of the ASI-3 was associated with distress intolerance scores, indicating adequate criterion-related validity.

CONCLUSION

The factorial structure of the ASI-3 is best described as a bifactor-ESEM model for Korean college students. Additionally, the bifactor-ESEM model of the ASI-3 includes a strong global factor that explains a large amount of the observed variance in the ASI-3 items.

摘要

目的

焦虑敏感性与多种情绪障碍的发作和进展相关。焦虑敏感性指数3(ASI-3)是一种用于焦虑敏感性的自我报告量表。本研究旨在使用探索性结构方程模型(ESEM)这一最新的先进技术来解决关于ASI-3因子结构的持续争议。

方法

使用验证性因子分析(CFA)、ESEM、双因素CFA和双因素ESEM来研究ASI-3的因子结构。300名韩国大学生(女性 = 195名,年龄:21.74 ± 2.34)填写了ASI-3和痛苦不耐受指数。

结果

双因素ESEM模型的拟合优度优于其他4个替代模型。在双因素ESEM模型中,一般因素显示出更高的载荷和信度,并且比3个特定因素解释了更多的共同方差。大多数项目反映了全局因素,但特定因素中的6个项目(项目2、3、5、7、10和17)载荷不足。此外,ASI-3的全局因素与痛苦不耐受得分相关,表明具有足够的效标关联效度。

结论

对于韩国大学生而言,ASI-3的因子结构最好描述为双因素ESEM模型。此外,ASI-3的双因素ESEM模型包含一个强大的全局因素,该因素解释了ASI-3项目中大量的观测方差。

相似文献

1
Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling Analysis of the Anxiety Sensitivity Index 3.焦虑敏感性指数3的探索性结构方程模型分析
Alpha Psychiatry. 2024 Jun 1;25(3):337-343. doi: 10.5152/alphapsychiatry.2024.241520. eCollection 2024 Jun.
2
Investigating the Dimensionality of Early Numeracy Using the Bifactor Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling Framework.使用双因素探索性结构方程建模框架研究早期算术能力的维度
Front Psychol. 2021 Jun 22;12:680124. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.680124. eCollection 2021.
3
The second language trait emotional intelligence (L2-TEI) scale and its relation to language engagement.第二语言特质情绪智力(L2-TEI)量表及其与语言参与的关系。
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2024 Oct;250:104511. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104511. Epub 2024 Oct 18.
4
Translation and validation of a Chinese version of the Appearance Schemas Inventory-Revised in Chinese adults.中文成年人外貌模式量表修订版的翻译和验证。
Body Image. 2024 Mar;48:101671. doi: 10.1016/j.bodyim.2023.101671. Epub 2023 Dec 30.
5
Factorial validity of the Twi versions of five measures of mental health and well-being in Ghana.加纳五种心理健康和幸福感测量工具的繁体中文版本的因子有效性。
PLoS One. 2020 Aug 11;15(8):e0236707. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0236707. eCollection 2020.
6
Factor structure and measurement invariance of the Basic Psychological Needs Scale in three South African samples: A bifactor exploratory structural equation modelling approach.南非三个样本中基本心理需求量表的因子结构与测量不变性:双因子探索性结构方程建模方法
Psychol Rep. 2022 Oct;125(5):2760-2787. doi: 10.1177/00332941211025275. Epub 2021 Jun 26.
7
Bifactor exploratory structural equation modeling: A meta-analytic review of model fit.双因素探索性结构方程建模:模型拟合的元分析综述。
Front Psychol. 2022 Oct 26;13:1037111. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1037111. eCollection 2022.
8
Validation of L2 grit among Chinese EFL high school students and its enduring effect on achievements: A bifactor model approach.中国高中英语学习者中L2毅力的验证及其对学业成绩的持久影响:一种双因素模型方法
Front Psychol. 2022 Sep 29;13:971495. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.971495. eCollection 2022.
9
The General Factor of Well-Being: Multinational Evidence Using Bifactor ESEM on the Mental Health Continuum-Short Form.幸福的一般因素:使用心理健康连续体-短式量表的双因素 ESEM 对多国证据进行分析。
Assessment. 2020 Apr;27(3):596-606. doi: 10.1177/1073191117748394. Epub 2017 Dec 27.
10
Construct Validation of Self-Determination Theory in Second Language Scale: The Bifactor Exploratory Structural Equation Modeling Approach.第二语言量表中自我决定理论的结构效度:双因素探索性结构方程建模方法。
Front Psychol. 2021 Sep 30;12:732016. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.732016. eCollection 2021.

本文引用的文献

1
Examining the Factor Structure of the Anxiety Sensitivity Index-3 in a Turkish Sample: The Factor Structure of the Anxiety Sensitivity Index-3.检验土耳其样本中焦虑敏感指数-3 的因素结构:焦虑敏感指数-3 的因素结构。
Psychol Rep. 2022 Dec;125(6):3289-3312. doi: 10.1177/00332941211040427. Epub 2021 Aug 20.
2
Psychometric properties of the Iranian version of the Anxiety Sensitivity Index-3 (ASI-3).伊朗版焦虑敏感性指数-3(ASI-3)的心理测量学特性。
Trends Psychiatry Psychother. 2019 Oct 17;41(3):254-261. doi: 10.1590/2237-6089-2018-0078. eCollection 2019.
3
Reliability, validation and norms of the Chinese version of Anxiety Sensitivity Index 3 in a sample of military personnel.
焦虑敏感指数 3 中文版在军人样本中的信度、效度和常模。
PLoS One. 2018 Aug 9;13(8):e0201778. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201778. eCollection 2018.
4
The General Factor of Well-Being: Multinational Evidence Using Bifactor ESEM on the Mental Health Continuum-Short Form.幸福的一般因素:使用心理健康连续体-短式量表的双因素 ESEM 对多国证据进行分析。
Assessment. 2020 Apr;27(3):596-606. doi: 10.1177/1073191117748394. Epub 2017 Dec 27.
5
The utility of the bifactor model in understanding unique components of anxiety sensitivity in a South Korean sample.双因素模型在理解韩国样本中焦虑敏感性独特成分方面的效用。
Asian J Psychiatr. 2016 Aug;22:116-23. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2016.06.005. Epub 2016 Jun 25.
6
Exploratory structural equation modeling: an integration of the best features of exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis.探索性结构方程模型:探索性和验证性因子分析最佳特征的整合。
Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2014;10:85-110. doi: 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032813-153700. Epub 2013 Dec 2.
7
Scoring and modeling psychological measures in the presence of multidimensionality.多维性存在下心理测量的评分和建模。
J Pers Assess. 2013;95(2):129-40. doi: 10.1080/00223891.2012.725437. Epub 2012 Oct 2.
8
Korean Anxiety Sensitivity Index-3: its factor structure, reliability, and validity in non-clinical samples.韩国焦虑敏感指数-3:在非临床样本中的因子结构、信度和效度。
Psychiatry Investig. 2012 Mar;9(1):45-53. doi: 10.4306/pi.2012.9.1.45. Epub 2012 Jan 25.
9
Dimensions of anxiety sensitivity in the anxiety disorders: evaluation of the ASI-3.焦虑敏感在焦虑障碍中的维度:ASI-3 的评估。
J Anxiety Disord. 2012 Apr;26(3):401-8. doi: 10.1016/j.janxdis.2012.01.002. Epub 2012 Jan 14.
10
A novel method for assessing distress intolerance: adaptation of a measure of willingness to pay.一种评估痛苦耐受力的新方法:意愿支付测量的改编。
J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2011 Dec;42(4):440-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jbtep.2011.04.003. Epub 2011 Apr 20.