Suppr超能文献

低强度冲击波疗法治疗勃起功能障碍的疗效:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。

Efficacy of low-intensity shock wave therapy for erectile dysfunction: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

作者信息

Angulo J C, Arance I, de Las Heras M M, Meilán E, Esquinas C, Andrés E M

机构信息

Servicio de Urología, Hospital Universitario, Getafe, Madrid, España; Departamento Clínico, Facultad de Ciencias Biomédicas, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Laureate Universities, Getafe, Madrid, España.

Servicio de Urología, Hospital Universitario, Getafe, Madrid, España.

出版信息

Actas Urol Esp. 2017 Oct;41(8):479-490. doi: 10.1016/j.acuro.2016.07.005. Epub 2016 Aug 10.

Abstract

CONTEXT

The low-intensity shockwave (LISW) therapy is a recently developed modality for treating erectile dysfunction.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the efficacy of LISW therapy for treating erectile dysfunction as described in the literature.

ACQUISITION OF EVIDENCE

Two independent reviewers identified studies eligible for a systematic review and meta-analysis of various sources written in English and Spanish, using the databases of PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science. We excluded studies on Peyronie's disease. We employed the DerSimonian-Laird method for defining heterogeneity, calculating the grouped standard deviation of the mean (SDM). The primary objective of this review is to assess efficacy based on the change in the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-EF) over baseline at 1 month from the start of treatment, both for the treatment arm and the placebo arm. The secondary objective is focused on analysing IIEF-EF at 3-6 months from the start of the therapy.

SUMMARY OF THE EVIDENCE

The pooled data of 636 patients from 12 studies showed that treatment with LISW resulted in a significant increase in IIEF-EF at 1 month with respect to baseline (SDM, -2.92; P=.000), to a greater degree than placebo (SDM, -.99; P=.000). The IIEF-EF at 3-6 months for the treated patients was significantly greater than baseline (SDM, -2.78; P=.000). Only one study compared the efficacy of placebo at 3-6 months versus baseline (SDM, -9.14). The comparison between LISW and placebo favours active treatment (SDM, 2.53; P=.000) at 1 month. There are insufficient data in the literature to assess the response over placebo at 3-6 months.

CONCLUSIONS

According to the literature, treatment with LISW for erectile dysfunction is effective, both in the short and medium term. LISW has been described as more effective than placebo in the short term. The long-term efficacy data are insufficient. More studies are needed to explain the role of this therapy according to specific causes of erectile dysfunction.

摘要

背景

低强度冲击波(LISW)疗法是一种最近开发的治疗勃起功能障碍的方法。

目的

评估文献中所述的LISW疗法治疗勃起功能障碍的疗效。

证据获取

两名独立评审员使用PubMed、EMBASE和科学网数据库,从英文和西班牙文撰写的各种来源中识别符合系统评价和荟萃分析条件的研究。我们排除了关于佩罗尼氏病的研究。我们采用DerSimonian-Laird方法定义异质性,计算平均分组标准差(SDM)。本综述的主要目的是根据治疗开始后1个月时国际勃起功能指数(IIEF-EF)相对于基线的变化来评估疗效,包括治疗组和安慰剂组。次要目的是关注治疗开始后3至6个月时的IIEF-EF分析。

证据总结

来自12项研究的636名患者的汇总数据显示,与基线相比,LISW治疗在1个月时使IIEF-EF显著增加(SDM,-2.92;P = 0.000),程度大于安慰剂(SDM,-0.99;P = 0.000)。治疗患者在3至6个月时的IIEF-EF显著高于基线(SDM,-2.78;P = 0.000)。只有一项研究比较了3至6个月时安慰剂与基线的疗效(SDM,-9.14)。在1个月时,LISW与安慰剂的比较有利于积极治疗(SDM,2.53;P = 0.000)。文献中没有足够的数据来评估3至6个月时相对于安慰剂的反应。

结论

根据文献,LISW治疗勃起功能障碍在短期和中期均有效。LISW在短期内被描述为比安慰剂更有效。长期疗效数据不足。需要更多的研究来根据勃起功能障碍的具体原因解释这种疗法的作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验