Boyce Catherine, Watson Mistral, Lazidis Grace, Reeve Sarah, Dods Kenneth, Simmer Karen, McLeod Gemma
1Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences,The University of Western Australia,35 Stirling Highway,Crawley,WA 6009,Australia.
2ChemCentre,Food and Compositional Chemistry,Building 500 Manning Road,Bentley,WA 6101,Australia.
Br J Nutr. 2016 Sep;116(6):1033-45. doi: 10.1017/S0007114516003007. Epub 2016 Aug 15.
There are wide variations in the macronutrient values adopted by neonatal intensive care units and industry to fortify milk in efforts to achieve recommended intakes for preterm infants. Contributing to this is the variation in macronutrient composition of preterm milk between and within mothers and the variable quality of milk analyses used to determine the macronutrient content of milk. We conducted a systematic review of the literature using articles published in English between 1959 and 2013 that reported the concentrations of one or more macronutrients or energy content in human preterm milk, sampled over a representative 24-h period. Searched medical databases included Ovid Medline, Scopus, CINAHL and the Cochrane Library. Results are presented as mean values and ranges for each macronutrient during weeks 1-8 of lactation, and preferred mean values (g/100 ml) for colostrum (week 1) and mature milk (weeks 2-8; protein: 1·27, fat: 3·46, lactose: 6·15 and carbohydrate: 7·34), using data from studies employing the highest-quality analyses. Industry-directed fortification practices using these mean values fail to meet protein targets for infants weighing <1000 g when the fortified milk is fed <170-190 ml/kg per d, and the protein:energy ratio of the fortified milk is inadequate. This study aimed to provide additional information to industry in order to guide their future formulation of breast milk fortifiers. Quality macronutrient analyses of adequately sampled preterm breast milk would improve our understanding of the level of fortification needed to meet recommended protein and energy intakes and growth targets, as well as support standardised reporting of nutritional outcomes.
新生儿重症监护病房和企业为强化母乳以达到早产儿推荐摄入量所采用的宏量营养素值存在很大差异。造成这种情况的原因包括母亲之间以及母亲自身母乳中宏量营养素组成的差异,以及用于测定母乳宏量营养素含量的乳汁分析质量参差不齐。我们对1959年至2013年间发表的英文文献进行了系统综述,这些文献报告了在代表性的24小时时间段内采集的人类早产母乳中一种或多种宏量营养素的浓度或能量含量。检索的医学数据库包括Ovid Medline、Scopus、CINAHL和Cochrane图书馆。结果以哺乳期第1 - 8周每种宏量营养素的平均值和范围呈现,并给出了初乳(第1周)和成熟乳(第2 - 8周;蛋白质:1·27、脂肪:3·46、乳糖:6·15、碳水化合物:7·34)的优选平均值(g/100 ml),数据来自采用最高质量分析的研究。当强化母乳的喂养量低于每天170 - 190 ml/kg时,按照这些平均值进行的企业定向强化做法无法满足体重<1000 g婴儿的蛋白质目标,且强化母乳的蛋白质:能量比不足。本研究旨在为企业提供更多信息,以指导其未来母乳强化剂的配方制定。对充分采样的早产母乳进行高质量的宏量营养素分析,将有助于我们更好地理解达到推荐蛋白质和能量摄入量及生长目标所需的强化水平,同时也有助于支持营养结果的标准化报告。