Marcero Jason R, Piel Iii Robert B, Burch Joseph S, Dailey Harry A
Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology, Biomedical and Health Sciences Institute, University of Georgia, Athens.
Biotechniques. 2016 Aug 1;61(2):83-91. doi: 10.2144/000114444. eCollection 2016.
Rapid and accurate heme quantitation in the research lab has become more desirable as the crucial role that intracellular hemoproteins play in metabolism continues to emerge. Here, the time-honored approaches of pyridine hemochromogen and fluorescence heme assays are compared with direct absorbance-based technologies using the CLARiTY spectrophotometer. All samples tested with these methods were rich in hemoglobin-associated heme, including buffered hemoglobin standards, whole blood from mice, and murine erythroleukemia (MEL) and K562 cells. While the pyridine hemochromogen assay demonstrated the greatest linear range of heme detection, all 3 methods demonstrated similar analytical sensitivities and normalized limits of quantitation of ∼1 µM. Surprisingly, the fluorescence assay was only shown to be distinct in its ability to quantitate extremely small samples. Using the CLARiTY system in combination with pyridine hemochromogen and cell count data, a common hemoglobin extinction coefficient for blood and differentiating MEL and K562 cells of 0.46 µM-1 cm-1 was derived. This value was applied to supplemental experiments designed to measure MEL cell hemoglobinization in response to the addition or removal of factors previously shown to affect heme biosynthesis (e.g., L-glutamine, iron).
随着细胞内血红素蛋白在新陈代谢中所起的关键作用不断显现,研究实验室中快速准确的血红素定量变得更加迫切。在此,将历史悠久的吡啶血色原法和荧光血红素测定法与使用CLARiTY分光光度计的基于直接吸光度的技术进行了比较。用这些方法测试的所有样品都富含与血红蛋白相关的血红素,包括缓冲血红蛋白标准品、小鼠全血以及小鼠红白血病(MEL)细胞和K562细胞。虽然吡啶血色原测定法显示出血红素检测的最大线性范围,但所有这三种方法都显示出相似的分析灵敏度,定量归一化限约为1 μM。令人惊讶的是,荧光测定法仅在定量极少量样品的能力方面表现出独特性。结合使用CLARiTY系统、吡啶血色原法和细胞计数数据,得出血液以及区分MEL细胞和K562细胞的常见血红蛋白消光系数为0.46 μM-1 cm-1。该值应用于补充实验,这些实验旨在测量MEL细胞在添加或去除先前已证明会影响血红素生物合成的因子(例如L-谷氨酰胺、铁)后的血红蛋白化情况。