Ohata Ken, Fu Kuangi, Sakai Eiji, Nonaka Kouichi, Tashima Tomoaki, Minato Yohei, Ohno Akiko, Ito Takafumi, Tsuji Yosuke, Chiba Hideyuki, Yamawaki Makoto, Hemmi Hideyuki, Nakaya Teruo, Fukushima Junichi, Matsuhashi Nobuyuki
Department of Gastroenterology, NTT Medical Center Tokyo, Tokyo 141-8625, Japan.
Department of Endoscopy, Kanma Memorial Hospital, Nasushiobara 325-0046, Japan.
Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2016;2016:3186168. doi: 10.1155/2016/3186168. Epub 2016 Jul 27.
Esophageal endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is technically difficult. To make it safer, we developed a novel method using overtube with a traction forceps (OTF) for countertraction during submucosal dissection. We conducted an ex vivo animal study and compared the clinical outcomes between OTF-ESD and conventional method (C-ESD). A total of 32 esophageal ESD procedures were performed by four beginner and expert endoscopists. After circumferential mucosal incision for the target lesion, structured as the isolated pig esophagus 3 cm long, either C-ESD or OTF-ESD was randomly selected for submucosal dissection. All the ESD procedures were completed as en bloc resections, while perforation only occurred in a beginner's C-ESD procedure. The dissection time for OTF-ESD was significantly shorter than that for C-ESD for both the beginner and expert endoscopists (22.8 ± 8.3 min versus 7.8 ± 4.5 min, P < 0.001, and 11.3 ± 4.4 min versus 5.9 ± 2.5 min, P = 0.01, resp.). The frequency and volume of the submucosal injections were significantly smaller for OTF-ESD than for C-ESD (1.3 ± 0.6 times versus 2.9 ± 1.5 times, P < 0.001, and 5.3 ± 2.8 mL versus 15.6 ± 7.3 mL, P < 0.001, resp.). Histologically, muscular injury was more common among the C-ESD procedures (80% versus 13%, P = 0.009). Our results indicated that the OTF-ESD technique is useful for the safe and easy completion of esophageal ESD.
食管内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)技术难度较大。为使其更安全,我们开发了一种新型方法,即在黏膜下剥离术中使用带牵引钳的外套管(OTF)进行反向牵引。我们开展了一项离体动物研究,并比较了OTF-ESD与传统方法(C-ESD)的临床结果。四位初、中级内镜医师共进行了32例食管ESD手术。在对作为3厘米长孤立猪食管构建的目标病变进行环形黏膜切开后,随机选择C-ESD或OTF-ESD进行黏膜下剥离。所有ESD手术均完整切除,穿孔仅发生在一位初级医师的C-ESD手术中。初级和中级内镜医师的OTF-ESD剥离时间均显著短于C-ESD(分别为22.8±8.3分钟对7.8±4.5分钟,P<0.001;以及11.3±4.4分钟对5.9±2.5分钟,P=0.01)。OTF-ESD的黏膜下注射频率和剂量均显著低于C-ESD(分别为1.3±0.6次对2.9±1.5次,P<0.001;以及5.3±2.8毫升对15.6±7.3毫升,P<0.001)。组织学检查显示,C-ESD手术中肌肉损伤更为常见(80%对1