Downey Heather, Threlkeld Guinever, Warburton Jeni
La Trobe Rural Health School, La Trobe University, Albury Wodonga Campus, University Drive, Wodonga 3690, Australia.
Rural Aged Care, La Trobe University, Albury Wodonga Campus, University Drive, Wodonga 3690, Australia.
J Aging Stud. 2016 Aug;38:57-69. doi: 10.1016/j.jaging.2016.04.007. Epub 2016 May 13.
Australian farming, predominantly based on a family farming model, reflects a distinct culture and identity within Australia. Generativity can be identified within the longstanding practice of patrilineal generational farm succession. However, the changing social, economic and environmental context facing farmers today, is now threatening the sustainability and viability of the family farming model. The outcome in Australia, as elsewhere, has been a significant decline in the number of farming families and a sharp reduction in the number of young people entering farming. Overall, farmers are increasingly aging on farm in two-person households and without a next generation to follow. In this scenario, the article presents research which aims to explore how older Australian couples construct generativity across their life course. The study draws on constructionist narrative research conducted in the Australian New South Wales Southern Riverina. Generativity, as presented by Erikson (1950) and Kotre (1996), is utilised as a theoretical frame by which to explore the meaning of generational family farming in six couples' stories of navigating later life challenges. Drawing on Gubrium and Holstein's (1998) 'narrative practice' analytic framework, this article examines tensions between couples' jointly constructed narratives and the grand narrative of Australian family farming. A 'narrative practice' approach permits examination of the meaning of experience, coherence, and the ways contexts, as well as stories of the past influence stories told about couples' present and future generative expression. This approach is highly consistent with the rapidly changing farming context where couples may be trying hard to construct a coherent story within a distinct family farming grand narrative under considerable tension. Findings show that in this context, and often in the absence of the next generation, there are visible changes in farming couples' expression of generativity. The grand narrative of Australian family farming is compromised and older farming couples are being pressured to develop a new script for aging. In some cases, this is also causing significant tensions between couples, particularly around individual constructions of retirement. These findings may have some resonance with farming in other western countries, where aging farmers are faced with broad social and economic change.
澳大利亚的农业主要基于家庭农场模式,反映了澳大利亚独特的文化和身份。在父系世代相传的农场继承这一长期实践中,可以发现代际传承的存在。然而,如今农民面临的不断变化的社会、经济和环境背景,正威胁着家庭农场模式的可持续性和生存能力。与其他地方一样,澳大利亚的结果是务农家庭数量大幅下降,从事农业的年轻人数量急剧减少。总体而言,农民在两人家庭中日益老龄化,且没有下一代来接班。在这种情况下,本文介绍了一项旨在探索澳大利亚老年夫妇如何在其人生历程中构建代际传承的研究。该研究借鉴了在澳大利亚新南威尔士州南里弗赖纳进行的建构主义叙事研究。埃里克森(1950年)和科特雷(1996年)提出的代际传承,被用作一个理论框架,用以探究六对夫妇应对晚年挑战的故事中代际家庭农业的意义。本文借鉴古布里姆和霍尔斯坦(1998年)的“叙事实践”分析框架,审视了夫妇共同构建的叙事与澳大利亚家庭农业宏大叙事之间的紧张关系。“叙事实践”方法允许考察经验的意义、连贯性,以及背景的方式,以及过去的故事如何影响关于夫妇当前和未来代际表达的故事。这种方法与快速变化的农业背景高度一致,在这种背景下,夫妇们可能在巨大压力下,努力在独特的家庭农业宏大叙事中构建一个连贯的故事。研究结果表明,在这种情况下,而且往往在没有下一代的情况下,务农夫妇的代际传承表达出现了明显变化。澳大利亚家庭农业的宏大叙事受到损害,老年务农夫妇被迫为老龄化制定新的脚本。在某些情况下,这也在夫妇之间造成了重大紧张关系,尤其是在个人对退休的构想方面。这些发现可能与其他西方国家的农业情况有一些共鸣,在这些国家,老龄化农民面临着广泛的社会和经济变革。