Department of Psychology, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, Northumbria University , Newcastle Upon Tyne , UK.
Directorate of Public Health, Blackpool Council , Blackpool , UK.
Front Public Health. 2016 Aug 2;4:161. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2016.00161. eCollection 2016.
In the last decade, the provision of school breakfast has increased significantly in the UK. However, there is an absence of knowledge regarding senior stakeholder views on the processes and potential outcomes on different groups, within the communities served by school breakfast programs. The purpose of this study was to examine the views and experiences of senior level stakeholders and thereby provide an original qualitative contribution to the research. A sample of senior level stakeholders was recruited, including senior officers, directors, and elected members, from within a Local Authority (LA) involved in the leadership, implementation and delivery of a council-wide universal free school breakfast (UFSB) program, and from the senior staff body of mainstream primary and special schools, participating in the program. A grounded theory analysis of the data collected identified issues encountered in the implementation and delivery, and views on the funding and future of a USFB program, in addition to perceived outcomes for children, parents, families, schools, and the wider community. The results refer to both positive and negative issues and implications associated with the program, according to the perspectives of senior level stakeholders. Perceived positive outcomes included benefits to children, families, schools, and the community. For instance, alleviating hunger, improving health outcomes, and conferring financial benefits, with the potential to cumulate in overall improvements in educational, social, and behavioral outcomes. Reported negative implications included the absence of an effective communication strategy in implementing the USFB program; in addition to concerns about the impacts of "double-breakfasting" on obesity levels among children, particularly in less deprived communities. Findings were validated using theoretical sampling and saturation, triangulation methods, member checks, and inter-rater reliability measures. In presenting these findings, this paper provides a unique qualitative insight into the processes, issues and outcomes of a council-wide UFSB program within a socioeconomically deprived community, according to the perceptions of senior level stakeholders.
在过去的十年中,英国提供学校早餐的服务大大增加。然而,对于学校早餐计划所服务社区内不同群体的过程和潜在结果,高级利益相关者的意见却知之甚少。本研究的目的是检查高级利益相关者的意见和经验,从而为研究提供原创性的定性贡献。从参与领导、实施和提供整个委员会范围内普遍免费学校早餐(UFSB)计划的地方当局(LA)的高级官员、董事和当选成员中,以及从参与该计划的主流小学和特殊学校的高级工作人员中,招募了高级利益相关者的样本。对收集到的数据进行的扎根理论分析确定了在实施和交付过程中遇到的问题,以及对 UFSB 计划的资金和未来的看法,以及对儿童、家长、家庭、学校和更广泛社区的预期结果的看法。根据高级利益相关者的观点,研究结果涉及与该计划相关的积极和消极问题及影响。预期的积极结果包括对儿童、家庭、学校和社区的好处。例如,缓解饥饿、改善健康结果,并带来经济利益,有可能累积提高教育、社会和行为结果。报告的负面影响包括在实施 UFSB 计划方面缺乏有效的沟通策略;此外,还担心“双重早餐”对儿童肥胖水平的影响,尤其是在贫困程度较低的社区。通过使用理论抽样和饱和度、三角测量方法、成员检查和评级者间可靠性措施验证了研究结果。在提出这些发现时,本文根据高级利益相关者的看法,提供了一个关于社会经济贫困社区内全委员会范围内 UFSB 计划的过程、问题和结果的独特定性见解。