Suppr超能文献

手术与利妥昔单抗治疗原发性胃弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤的疗效

[Efficacy of surgery and rituximab in primary gastric diffuse large B-cell lymphoma].

作者信息

Huang H W, Jiang Y B, Fu T W, Xu T, Chen X C, Jin Z M, Wu D P

机构信息

Jiangsu Institute of Hematology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou 215006, China.

出版信息

Zhonghua Xue Ye Xue Za Zhi. 2016 Jul;37(7):602-6. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.issn.0253-2727.2016.07.012.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the outcome of surgical resection and rituximab for treatment of primary gastric diffuse large B cell lymphoma (PGDLBCL).

METHODS

Data of 83 patients with primary gastric diffuse large B cell lymphoma were reviewed retrospectively. 40 patients received surgical resection followed by chemotherapy, and the other 43 patients chemotherapy alone. The two groups were further divided into four sub- groups according to chemotherapy regimens (CHOP or R- CHOP). Overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) as two prognostic indexes were analyzed.

RESULTS

The median age of these 83 cases at diagnosis was 52 years (range, 20-76 years) with a male-to-female ratio of 43 to 40. And the follow-up duration ranged from 4-59 months (mean 36 months). The 5-year PFS for the patients received surgery and chemotherapy was 66.7%. PFS for the patients received chemotherapy alone was 82.6%. And 5-year OS for these two groups was 68.4% and 85.9%,respectively. OS and PFS of chemotherapy alone group were better than the other one without statistically significance. In the combined group, the 5- year OS were 73.6% for patients received R- CHOP and 64.2% for patients received CHOP; the 5- year- PFS were 71.2% and 62.5%, respectively. Meanwhile, the 5- year OS for patients received R-CHOP and CHOP were 85.7% and 83.5%; the 5-year-PFS were 83.4% and 81.8%, respectively. The OS and PFS did not differ significantly (P>0.05) between two chemotherapy regimens. According to the Lugano stage, those who received chemotherapy alone for the patients with advanced stage (Ⅱ2, ⅡE or Ⅳ) had better OS compared with received surgery and chemotherapy. A significant difference was found between the two groups (P<0.05). However for the patients with early stage (Ⅰ or Ⅱ 2), there was no statistically significance between the two groups (P>0.05). Univariate analysis showed that age, ECOG, Lugano stage, level of LDH and IPI score (P<0.05) were factors of survival in patients with PGDLBCL. And multivariate analysis showed that IPI score was an independent prognostic factor for OS.

CONCLUSION

The survival of the patients received combined surgery and chemotherapy was not superior to those received chemotherapy alone. There was no statistically significance between two different regimens for prognosis of PGDLBCL. Because of poor quality of life caused by surgery, surgery shouldn't now been recommended for the patients with PGDLBCL without operative indication. Rituximab had no positive influence on OS and PFS in most patients with PGDLBCL, but this result should be confirmed by further large sample and multi-center study.

摘要

目的

评估手术切除联合利妥昔单抗治疗原发性胃弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤(PGDLBCL)的疗效。

方法

回顾性分析83例原发性胃弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤患者的数据。40例患者接受手术切除后化疗,另外43例患者仅接受化疗。根据化疗方案(CHOP或R-CHOP)将两组进一步分为四个亚组。分析总生存期(OS)和无进展生存期(PFS)这两个预后指标。

结果

这83例患者诊断时的中位年龄为52岁(范围20-76岁),男女比例为43比40。随访时间为4-59个月(平均36个月)。接受手术和化疗患者的5年PFS为66.7%。仅接受化疗患者的PFS为82.6%。这两组的5年OS分别为68.4%和85.9%。单纯化疗组的OS和PFS优于另一组,但无统计学意义。在联合组中,接受R-CHOP患者的5年OS为73.6%,接受CHOP患者的为64.2%;5年PFS分别为71.2%和62.5%。同时,接受R-CHOP和CHOP患者的5年OS分别为85.7%和83.5%;5年PFS分别为83.4%和81.8%。两种化疗方案之间的OS和PFS无显著差异(P>0.05)。根据卢加诺分期,晚期(Ⅱ2、ⅡE或Ⅳ期)患者单纯接受化疗的OS优于接受手术和化疗的患者。两组间差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。然而,早期(Ⅰ期或Ⅱ1期)患者两组间无统计学意义(P>0.05)。单因素分析显示,年龄、美国东部肿瘤协作组(ECOG)评分、卢加诺分期、乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)水平和国际预后指数(IPI)评分(P<0.05)是PGDLBCL患者的生存因素。多因素分析显示,IPI评分是OS的独立预后因素。

结论

接受手术联合化疗患者的生存情况并不优于单纯接受化疗的患者。PGDLBCL预后的两种不同方案之间无统计学意义。由于手术导致生活质量下降,目前不建议对无手术指征的PGDLBCL患者进行手术。利妥昔单抗对大多数PGDLBCL患者的OS和PFS没有积极影响,但这一结果应通过进一步的大样本多中心研究来证实。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/605d/7364997/793e12dedbcb/cjh-37-07-602-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验