Binn M, Ruskoné-Fourmestraux A, Lepage E, Haioun C, Delmer A, Aegerter P, Lavergne A, Guettier C, Delchier J-C
Hôpital Henri Mondor, Gastroentérologie, Créteil, Val de Marne, France.
Ann Oncol. 2003 Dec;14(12):1751-7. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdg495.
The usefulness of chemotherapy to treat gastric diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCL) is well known. Whether or not chemotherapy should be performed as the only treatment or after surgical resection is debated. The aim of this study was to compare two strategies: surgical resection plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone.
Between January 1988 and December 1996, 58 patients included in the trials promoted by the Groupe d'Etude des Lymphomes de l'Adulte (GELA) (LNH-87 and LNH-93) received chemotherapy and 48 included in the protocol of the Groupe d'Etude des Lymphomes Digestifs (GELD) underwent surgical resection followed by chemotherapy. They all presented with localized DLBCL (stage IE and IIE according to the Ann Arbor classification). From the GELA group, seven patients received additional radiotherapy. Gastrectomy was total in 27 of the 48 patients in the GELD group. In both groups chemotherapy included anthracyclin and alkylating agents. Chemotherapy was more intensive in the GELA group than in the GELD group.
In the GELA and the GELD groups, distribution according to sex ratio, age (>60 or < or = 60 years), ECOG performance status (> or = 2 or <2) and staging (IE or IIE) was similar. Univariate analysis comparing prognostic factors in both groups showed significant differences: serum lactate dehydrogenase level above normal (28.6% versus 2.4%, P = 0.001), tumor size >10 cm (28.6% versus 12.5%, P = 0.04), patients with International Prognostic Index (IPI) >1 (21.4% versus 11.1%, P = 0.168) and 5-year survival (79% versus 90%, P = 0.03). Multivariate analysis of prognostic factors with a Cox model showed that IPI was the only independent prognostic factor (odds ratio 3, P = 0.03). Consequently, patients with IPI 0-1 were selected for comparison between the GELA group (44 patients) and the GELD group (40 patients). There was no significant difference between the two groups. Median follow-up was 59 months (range 3-128). Estimates of 5-year survival rates and event-free survival rates were 90.5% versus 91.1% (P = 0.303) and 85.9% versus 91.6% (P = 0.187), respectively. In the GELA group, seven of 44 patients died: five from a lymphoma-unrelated cause and two from tumor progression. In the GELD group, four of 40 patients died: two of unrelated causes and two from tumor progression.
This study shows that in localized gastric DLBCL with IPI 0-1, a similar 5-year survival rate (>90%) is to be expected with either surgery plus chemotherapy or chemotherapy alone.
化疗用于治疗胃弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)的有效性已广为人知。对于化疗应作为唯一治疗手段还是在手术切除后进行,仍存在争议。本研究的目的是比较两种策略:手术切除加化疗与单纯化疗。
在1988年1月至1996年12月期间,成人淋巴瘤研究组(GELA)开展的试验(LNH - 87和LNH - 93)纳入的58例患者接受了化疗,而消化淋巴瘤研究组(GELD)方案纳入的48例患者接受了手术切除,随后进行化疗。他们均表现为局限性DLBCL(根据Ann Arbor分类为IE期和IIE期)。在GELA组中,7例患者接受了额外的放疗。GELD组48例患者中有27例行全胃切除术。两组化疗均包含蒽环类药物和烷化剂。GELA组的化疗强度高于GELD组。
在GELA组和GELD组中,按性别比例、年龄(>60岁或≤60岁)、东部肿瘤协作组(ECOG)体能状态(≥2或<2)以及分期(IE或IIE)的分布相似。对两组预后因素进行单因素分析显示存在显著差异:血清乳酸脱氢酶水平高于正常(28.6%对2.4%,P = 0.001)、肿瘤大小>10 cm(28.6%对12.5%,P = 0.04)、国际预后指数(IPI)>1的患者(21.4%对11.1%,P = 0.168)以及5年生存率(79%对90%,P = 0.03)。采用Cox模型对预后因素进行多因素分析显示,IPI是唯一的独立预后因素(比值比3,P = 0.03)。因此,选择IPI为0 - 1的患者在GELA组(44例患者)和GELD组(40例患者)之间进行比较。两组之间无显著差异。中位随访时间为59个月(范围3 - 128个月)。5年生存率和无事件生存率估计分别为90.5%对91.1%(P = 0.303)和85.9%对91.6%(P = 0.187)。在GELA组中,44例患者中有7例死亡:5例死于与淋巴瘤无关的原因,2例死于肿瘤进展。在GELD组中,40例患者中有4例死亡:2例死于无关原因,2例死于肿瘤进展。
本研究表明,对于IPI为0 - 1的局限性胃DLBCL,手术加化疗或单纯化疗的5年生存率相似(>90%)。