Suppr超能文献

基于胸部食管癌三维和四维CT成像的计划靶区比较

Comparison of planning target volumes based on three-dimensional and four-dimensional CT imaging of thoracic esophageal cancer.

作者信息

Wang Wei, Li Jianbin, Zhang Yingjie, Shao Qian, Xu Min, Fan Tingyong, Wang Jinzhi

机构信息

Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Shandong, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Onco Targets Ther. 2016 Aug 2;9:4785-91. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S104315. eCollection 2016.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To investigate the definition of planning target volumes (PTVs) based on four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) compared with conventional PTV definition and PTV definition using asymmetrical margins for thoracic primary esophageal cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-three patients with esophageal cancer underwent 3DCT and 4DCT simulation scans during free breathing. The motions of primary tumors located in the proximal (group A), middle (group B), and distal (group C) thoracic esophagus were obtained from the 4DCT scans. PTV3D was defined on 3DCT using the tumor motion measured based on 4DCT, PTV conventional (PTVconv) was defined on 3DCT by adding a 1.0 cm margin to the clinical target volume, and PTV4D was defined as the union of the target volumes contoured on the ten phases of the 4DCT images. The centroid positions, volumetric differences, and dice similarity coefficients were evaluated for all PTVs.

RESULTS

The median centroid shifts between PTV3D and PTV4D and between PTVconv and PTV4D in all three dimensions were <0.3 cm for the three groups. The median size ratios of PTV4D to PTV3D were 0.80, 0.88, and 0.71, and PTV4D to PTVconv were 0.67, 0.73, and 0.76 (χ (2)=-3.18, -2.98, and -3.06; P=0.001, 0.003, and 0.002) for groups A, B, and C, respectively. The dice similarity coefficients were 0.87, 0.90, and 0.81 between PTV4D and PTV3D and 0.80, 0.84, and 0.83 between PTV4D and PTVconv (χ (2) =-3.18, -2.98, and -3.06; P=0.001, 0.003, and 0.002) for groups A, B, and C, respectively. The difference between the degree of inclusion of PTV4D in PTV3D and that of PTV4D in PTVconv was <2% for all groups. Compared with PTVconv, the amount of irradiated normal tissue for PTV3D was decreased by 11.81% and 11.86% in groups A and B, respectively, but was increased by 2.93% in group C.

CONCLUSION

For proximal and middle esophageal cancer, 3DCT-based PTV using asymmetrical margins provides good coverage of PTV4D; however, for distal esophageal cancer, 3DCT-based PTV using conventional margins provides ideal conformity with PTV4D.

摘要

背景与目的

基于四维计算机断层扫描(4DCT)研究胸段原发性食管癌计划靶区(PTV)的定义,并与传统PTV定义及使用不对称边界的PTV定义进行比较。

材料与方法

43例食管癌患者在自由呼吸状态下接受了三维计算机断层扫描(3DCT)和4DCT模拟扫描。从4DCT扫描中获取位于胸段食管近端(A组)、中段(B组)和远端(C组)的原发肿瘤的运动情况。PTV3D是在3DCT上根据基于4DCT测量的肿瘤运动来定义的,传统PTV(PTVconv)是在3DCT上通过在临床靶区周围添加1.0 cm的边界来定义的,PTV4D被定义为4DCT图像十个时相上勾画的靶区的并集。对所有PTV评估其质心位置、体积差异和骰子相似系数。

结果

三组中,PTV3D与PTV4D之间以及PTVconv与PTV4D之间在所有三个维度上的质心位移中位数均<0.3 cm。A组、B组和C组PTV4D与PTV3D的体积比中位数分别为0.80、0.88和0.71,PTV4D与PTVconv的体积比中位数分别为0.67、0.73和0.76(χ(2)= -3.18、-2.98和-3.06;P = 0.001、0.003和0.002)。PTV4D与PTV3D之间的骰子相似系数分别为0.87、0.90和0.81,PTV4D与PTVconv之间的骰子相似系数分别为0.80、0.84和0.83(χ(2)= -3.18、-2.98和-3.06;P = 0.001、0.003和

相似文献

1
3
Analysis of the advantage of individual PTVs defined on axial 3D CT and 4D CT images for liver cancer.
J Appl Clin Med Phys. 2012 Nov 8;13(6):4017. doi: 10.1120/jacmp.v13i6.4017.
4
Comparison of the planning target volume based on three-dimensional CT and four-dimensional CT images of non-small-cell lung cancer.
Radiother Oncol. 2011 May;99(2):176-80. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2011.03.015. Epub 2011 May 4.
7
The institutional experience of the implementing 4DCT in NSCLC radiotherapy planning.
Rep Pract Oncol Radiother. 2023 Aug 28;28(4):445-453. doi: 10.5603/RPOR.a2023.0056. eCollection 2023.
9
Four-dimensional computed tomography in accelerated partial breast irradiation planning: single series from a phase III trial.
Radiol Med. 2015 Nov;120(11):1078-82. doi: 10.1007/s11547-015-0541-1. Epub 2015 Apr 24.

引用本文的文献

1
The Effect of Endoscopy on Patients with Malignant Esophageal Cancer after Medical Treatment and Chemotherapy.
Comput Math Methods Med. 2022 Apr 9;2022:7906302. doi: 10.1155/2022/7906302. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
Use of 4-dimensional computed tomography-based ventilation imaging to correlate lung dose and function with clinical outcomes.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2013 Jun 1;86(2):366-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.01.004. Epub 2013 Mar 6.
3
Preliminary study of the internal margin of the gross tumor volume in thoracic esophageal cancer.
Cancer Radiother. 2012 Oct;16(7):595-600. doi: 10.1016/j.canrad.2012.05.020. Epub 2012 Oct 15.
5
Quantifying the interfractional displacement of the gastroesophageal junction during radiation therapy for esophageal cancer.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Jun 1;83(2):e273-80. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.12.048. Epub 2012 Mar 21.
6
Comparison of the planning target volume based on three-dimensional CT and four-dimensional CT images of non-small-cell lung cancer.
Radiother Oncol. 2011 May;99(2):176-80. doi: 10.1016/j.radonc.2011.03.015. Epub 2011 May 4.
7
Cone beam CT verification for oesophageal cancer - impact of volume selected for image registration.
Acta Oncol. 2011 Nov;50(8):1183-90. doi: 10.3109/0284186X.2011.572912. Epub 2011 Apr 15.
8
Esophageal cancer dose escalation using a simultaneous integrated boost technique.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Jan 1;82(1):468-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.10.023. Epub 2010 Dec 1.
9
Four-dimensional measurement of the displacement of internal fiducial markers during 320-multislice computed tomography scanning of thoracic esophageal cancer.
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Feb 1;79(2):588-95. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.03.045. Epub 2010 Aug 1.
10
On correlated sources of uncertainty in four dimensional computed tomography data sets.
Technol Cancer Res Treat. 2010 Jun;9(3):299-306. doi: 10.1177/153303461000900309.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验