Wang Wei, Li Jianbin, Zhang Yingjie, Shao Qian, Xu Min, Fan Tingyong, Wang Jinzhi
Department of Radiation Oncology, Shandong Cancer Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University, Shandong Academy of Medical Sciences, Shandong, People's Republic of China.
Onco Targets Ther. 2016 Aug 2;9:4785-91. doi: 10.2147/OTT.S104315. eCollection 2016.
To investigate the definition of planning target volumes (PTVs) based on four-dimensional computed tomography (4DCT) compared with conventional PTV definition and PTV definition using asymmetrical margins for thoracic primary esophageal cancer.
Forty-three patients with esophageal cancer underwent 3DCT and 4DCT simulation scans during free breathing. The motions of primary tumors located in the proximal (group A), middle (group B), and distal (group C) thoracic esophagus were obtained from the 4DCT scans. PTV3D was defined on 3DCT using the tumor motion measured based on 4DCT, PTV conventional (PTVconv) was defined on 3DCT by adding a 1.0 cm margin to the clinical target volume, and PTV4D was defined as the union of the target volumes contoured on the ten phases of the 4DCT images. The centroid positions, volumetric differences, and dice similarity coefficients were evaluated for all PTVs.
The median centroid shifts between PTV3D and PTV4D and between PTVconv and PTV4D in all three dimensions were <0.3 cm for the three groups. The median size ratios of PTV4D to PTV3D were 0.80, 0.88, and 0.71, and PTV4D to PTVconv were 0.67, 0.73, and 0.76 (χ (2)=-3.18, -2.98, and -3.06; P=0.001, 0.003, and 0.002) for groups A, B, and C, respectively. The dice similarity coefficients were 0.87, 0.90, and 0.81 between PTV4D and PTV3D and 0.80, 0.84, and 0.83 between PTV4D and PTVconv (χ (2) =-3.18, -2.98, and -3.06; P=0.001, 0.003, and 0.002) for groups A, B, and C, respectively. The difference between the degree of inclusion of PTV4D in PTV3D and that of PTV4D in PTVconv was <2% for all groups. Compared with PTVconv, the amount of irradiated normal tissue for PTV3D was decreased by 11.81% and 11.86% in groups A and B, respectively, but was increased by 2.93% in group C.
For proximal and middle esophageal cancer, 3DCT-based PTV using asymmetrical margins provides good coverage of PTV4D; however, for distal esophageal cancer, 3DCT-based PTV using conventional margins provides ideal conformity with PTV4D.
基于四维计算机断层扫描(4DCT)研究胸段原发性食管癌计划靶区(PTV)的定义,并与传统PTV定义及使用不对称边界的PTV定义进行比较。
43例食管癌患者在自由呼吸状态下接受了三维计算机断层扫描(3DCT)和4DCT模拟扫描。从4DCT扫描中获取位于胸段食管近端(A组)、中段(B组)和远端(C组)的原发肿瘤的运动情况。PTV3D是在3DCT上根据基于4DCT测量的肿瘤运动来定义的,传统PTV(PTVconv)是在3DCT上通过在临床靶区周围添加1.0 cm的边界来定义的,PTV4D被定义为4DCT图像十个时相上勾画的靶区的并集。对所有PTV评估其质心位置、体积差异和骰子相似系数。
三组中,PTV3D与PTV4D之间以及PTVconv与PTV4D之间在所有三个维度上的质心位移中位数均<0.3 cm。A组、B组和C组PTV4D与PTV3D的体积比中位数分别为0.80、0.88和0.71,PTV4D与PTVconv的体积比中位数分别为0.67、0.73和0.76(χ(2)= -3.18、-2.98和-3.06;P = 0.001、0.003和0.002)。PTV4D与PTV3D之间的骰子相似系数分别为0.87、0.90和0.81,PTV4D与PTVconv之间的骰子相似系数分别为0.80、0.84和0.83(χ(2)= -3.18、-2.98和-3.06;P = 0.001、0.003和